Page 2 of 4 [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

coleslaw
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

Joined: 19 Jul 2016
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 89
Location: east midlands

20 Jul 2016, 9:03 am

Venetian snares is a big fan of 7/4 timsigs. His song 'mercy funk' undergoes many time signature changes. Starts in 11/4, then to 5/4 and 13/8 then back to 5/4 then some 23/8 and a 19/8, then 13/8, then 7/4, then 15/8 then finally 7/4



Britte
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,136
Location: @

20 Jul 2016, 10:37 am

Mad Rush - Phillip Glass _14/16 time



tourettebassist
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 148
Location: Space is the Place

20 Jul 2016, 11:03 am

Gabriel's Solsbury Hill 7/4



DancingCorpse
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,532

20 Jul 2016, 11:13 am

Tool have some ludicrous time signatures in their stuff, check Schism out for example



Chummy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,343
Location: Location

20 Jul 2016, 2:38 pm

Actually the main Harpsichord riff for" Golden brown" is in 13/8, only when he starts to sing it changes to 3/4.

Edit: BTW Coleslaw is my favorite salad (off topic).



MathematicalOwl
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

Joined: 10 Apr 2013
Age: 26
Gender: Female
Posts: 406

21 Jul 2016, 9:37 am

Дяволска Щерка (Devil's Daughter)

I'm not sure what time signature this is. Balkandji (Балканджи) do a lot of songs with unusual time signatures because they're influenced by Bulgarian folk music.

This is a polska, a Swedish dance with three beats in a bar. The second beat is often lengthened at the expense of the first (how much depends on the player), but they're usually written in 3/4. In this example, all the beats are the same length.


This one is mostly in 3/4 but some bars have an extra beat.


Here's one where the second beat is twice as long as the first. It could be written in 9/8.


North and east european folk music often uses complex rhythms.
Yes, it is one of my special interests.



gnossienne
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 43

01 Aug 2016, 7:54 am

I give you the king of songs not in 4/4 time.

Coming from the hip year of 1908, Prelude in the Lydian Mode is in 21/16 time.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

01 Aug 2016, 8:34 am

Some of this is 4/4, but most is not. The bridge just after the two minute mark gets particularly crazy. These guys are a bit grating on the ears and pretentious as hell, but they definitely know how to rock.



ZombyWoof
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 282
Location: Second Star To The Right

06 Aug 2016, 12:40 pm



listen to THIS!



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

06 Aug 2016, 4:11 pm



PhosphorusDecree
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,420
Location: Yorkshire, UK

06 Aug 2016, 5:59 pm

Pop and rock do sometimes feel like an unending desert of 4/4 time. There's a bit more variety than that, though even without getting into irregular rhythms.

Slow 6/8 time is reasonably common, and even surfaces in the charts occasionally. Things like "Kiss From a Rose" by Seal, "I'm With You" by Avril Lavigne and "Nights in White Satin" by the Moody Blues.

Leonard Cohen's early albums are full of what I think of as waltz (3/4) time, like "Master Song" and "Last Year's Man". Other waltzes: "The Last Waltz" (well, duh) and "It's Oh, So Quiet."

5/4: my favourite is "Animals" by Muse.

...and if you want to be pedantic, a lot of swung 4/4 can be considered to be 12/8 "really".

I write songs, and try to be a bit more varied, though more and more now I drift back to 4/4. I use 3/4 a lot, as coming from a classical background it feels natural to me. Also slow 3, which I think of as 3/2. One-offs: 7/8 and irregular 9/8; a 7/8+7/8+2/4 groove (18/8?) and a couple of different 5-beat rhythms. One of which was very slow with swung quarter-beats, so I could claim it as 30/16...


_________________
You're so vain
I bet you think this sig is about you


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

06 Aug 2016, 7:05 pm

PhosphorusDecree wrote:
...and if you want to be pedantic, a lot of swung 4/4 can be considered to be 12/8 "really".

What would you consider this...



It is written out in 4/4, but if you listen it isn't easy to count. It's a sequence of short beats interspersed with single longer beats that are 3/2 the length of the shorter beats. The music itself is pretty simple, but the off-length of some of the beats gives it a really eerie feeling. It has a feeling of being "too slow" as well.



PhosphorusDecree
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2016
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,420
Location: Yorkshire, UK

10 Aug 2016, 5:47 pm

marshall wrote:
PhosphorusDecree wrote:
...and if you want to be pedantic, a lot of swung 4/4 can be considered to be 12/8 "really".

What would you consider this...

It is written out in 4/4, but if you listen it isn't easy to count. It's a sequence of short beats interspersed with single longer beats that are 3/2 the length of the shorter beats. The music itself is pretty simple, but the off-length of some of the beats gives it a really eerie feeling. It has a feeling of being "too slow" as well.


I'd consider it confusing!

I couldn't work it out by ear, try as I might, so I found the sheet music. (http://www.onlinesheetmusic.com/pyramid ... 90128.aspx) It's 4/4 but so riddled with cross-rhythm that the piano chords only coincide with one beat in eight! The off-beat cross-rhythm is slow and stays the same, which is why we want to hear it as the beat. I reckon if Bartok had written this, he'd have called it "3+3+4+3+3/8", but that's before you find out it's /swung/ as well. (9+9+12+9+9/16?! Not so useful.) How they played this together, I don't know. Still, 4/4 is probably the clearest way to write it. A nice reminder that there are other ways of creating rhythmic complexity.

Some modern classical composers are guilty of using "precise" notation (like my 9+9+12+9+9/16) that fails to get the point across. I've had composer friends who seem to forget that someone actually has to READ the score. And there's a tale of a kettledrum player who sucessfully wrote out his part for the finale of "The Rite of Spring" again all in 4/4 because he got fed up of Stravinsky changing the time signature every. bloody. bar.


_________________
You're so vain
I bet you think this sig is about you


Britte
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,136
Location: @

18 Aug 2016, 3:23 am

the cinema show | g e n e s i s | 7/8 + 4/4 time _I hope acceptable with the 7/8 time, throughout the piece



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,739
Location: the island of defective toy santas

18 Aug 2016, 3:31 am

luiz bonfa's "manha de carnaval" is in 6/4 time-



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

18 Aug 2016, 3:40 pm

PhosphorusDecree wrote:
marshall wrote:
PhosphorusDecree wrote:
...and if you want to be pedantic, a lot of swung 4/4 can be considered to be 12/8 "really".

What would you consider this...

It is written out in 4/4, but if you listen it isn't easy to count. It's a sequence of short beats interspersed with single longer beats that are 3/2 the length of the shorter beats. The music itself is pretty simple, but the off-length of some of the beats gives it a really eerie feeling. It has a feeling of being "too slow" as well.


I'd consider it confusing!

I couldn't work it out by ear, try as I might, so I found the sheet music. (http://www.onlinesheetmusic.com/pyramid ... 90128.aspx) It's 4/4 but so riddled with cross-rhythm that the piano chords only coincide with one beat in eight! The off-beat cross-rhythm is slow and stays the same, which is why we want to hear it as the beat. I reckon if Bartok had written this, he'd have called it "3+3+4+3+3/8", but that's before you find out it's /swung/ as well. (9+9+12+9+9/16?! Not so useful.) How they played this together, I don't know. Still, 4/4 is probably the clearest way to write it. A nice reminder that there are other ways of creating rhythmic complexity.

Some modern classical composers are guilty of using "precise" notation (like my 9+9+12+9+9/16) that fails to get the point across. I've had composer friends who seem to forget that someone actually has to READ the score. And there's a tale of a kettledrum player who sucessfully wrote out his part for the finale of "The Rite of Spring" again all in 4/4 because he got fed up of Stravinsky changing the time signature every. bloody. bar.


I got the ratio's wrong. The long beat is actually 2 fourth notes combined, i.e. 4 eighth beats, while the short notes are 3 eighth beats). When I listen to it the piano melody, it comes across as having 6 beats with the third beat slowed down and the last beat overlapping the first beat of the next melodic line. The melody "tessellates" in a way. The time is filled with overlapping melodic structures.

Actually lot of 5/8 (5/4) signatures sound like this to me, like overlapping melodies. 5/8 (5/4) sounds like 6/8 (6/4) with overlap in the last/first beat. The time signature isn't always relevant to the melody I hear in my ears. 5/8 (5/4) will often sound kind-of "waltzy". Of course, the rhythm in Pyramid song has the additional complication of the third not being slowed by a 4:3 ratio.