Would naming trolls and useful-idiot tools violate rules?

Page 3 of 3 [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

14 Jul 2015, 1:56 am

What, exactly, would a paid government troll or a useful idiot tool be, if I may ask?


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

14 Jul 2015, 2:53 am

AspieUtah wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I've been called a troll on this forum before. I took it as a compliment and gave them more of it. :P

We all use different methods to oppose trolls.


Trolls feed on the low hanging fruit; the weak minded and neurotic.
Solution: Don't be troll food.

In my case I do feed them but just for the entertainment they provide. :P


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,811
Location: London

14 Jul 2015, 4:56 am

It would be extremely surprising if "the government" is paying anyone to post on a forum with a current userbase of about 20.

The answer was provided pretty quickly and it's not really a PPR question, so I'm going to lock this thread.

If you have evidence, beyond the user's views, that they are actually biased by being on someone's payroll, then point it out as relevant to the conversation, but don't use it to poison the well.

See also and also.