arguments here are too serious
He's funny
You'll spend an hour better watching this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNmUtnoD7Lk - than you will bothering with the oh-so PC 'activists' here (bring it, b*****s)
NowhereWoman wrote:
Okay, your comments here and previously are actually a great analogy for the whole bullying issue.
I feel you want to get attention. You have admitted you're miserable. Button-pushing posts get you attention (at least sometimes). I can understand wanting attention. It's quite normal to desire attention. There are many ways to get attention - not just by being negative and hence getting negative attention. In this case, though - you may feel the ends (attention) justify the means (attempting to push people's buttons) but they haven't really done anything long-term for you. The next time around, people are still not going to pay attention to you until you button-push, because you haven't learned a better way yet. But since it sometimes works you keep doing it...rather than learn a different skill. Yet your bottom line is: It works! There are definitely perks to pushing buttons. The ends justify the means.
I feel you want to get attention. You have admitted you're miserable. Button-pushing posts get you attention (at least sometimes). I can understand wanting attention. It's quite normal to desire attention. There are many ways to get attention - not just by being negative and hence getting negative attention. In this case, though - you may feel the ends (attention) justify the means (attempting to push people's buttons) but they haven't really done anything long-term for you. The next time around, people are still not going to pay attention to you until you button-push, because you haven't learned a better way yet. But since it sometimes works you keep doing it...rather than learn a different skill. Yet your bottom line is: It works! There are definitely perks to pushing buttons. The ends justify the means.
I certainly don’t want that kind of attention—the kind based on making assumptions about my “ends” and how they disqualify me for the debate. I’ve already stated my ends a few times and arguing about them with someone who claims to know them better than I do is a waste of time. And I don’t like the implication that looking for a civil debate with other willing participants is an evil goal.
I thought I could debate the topic at hand with you because you gave me a detailed reply in the other thread that seemed to address my points in an attempt to refute them without resorting to personal attacks, even if I still disagree; that’s why I replied the same way, expecting the discussion to continue in a similar fashion with anyone who cared to shed some light on it. Apparently, I was mistaken. If you don’t like my posts, please just ignore them from now on. I won’t seek your attention anymore unless you bring me up.
_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
How do you evaluate arguments? How do NTs? |
Today, 1:11 am |
SCOTUS Begins Hearing Arguments In OR Homelessness Case |
22 Apr 2024, 6:59 pm |