Very irritated with people who criticize Abortion
CockneyRebel wrote:
Perhaps I went a little overboard this morning. What I should have said is that people should consider whether they'd be happy with any child that God gives them, even a handicapped. If not, than they should consider adoption.
If you're going to play the God card, then I should say that not all religions believe life begins at conception. For example, Muslims have understood since the 7th century that the human embryo does not possess a soul until it is 120 days old. This is pretty close to what modern medicine has dictated (life begins at approximately 24 weeks).
smudge wrote:
I'm totally with nurseangela. So if a prostitute had a baby she would have to care for it, even though the man was responsible for impregnating her in the first place, and HAD A CHOICE HIMSELF not to get involved in something irresponsible. Yes, how convenient for the man. And a completely horrendous situation for the woman. After all she gets 100% blame either way from you, even though it was you who impregnated her, ruining her life (assuming according she *had* to keep the baby), but hey for you it was a jolly good time. Who gives a damn about the prozzie and her kid now anyway?
As regards to the "don't have sex then" argument...that is just unbelievable too. No matter how much you try to force your morals on other people, they will always have sex.
As with most arguments here, nobody ever changes their viewpoints. It's just the same rigid people dictating to others how they should live their lives.
As regards to the "don't have sex then" argument...that is just unbelievable too. No matter how much you try to force your morals on other people, they will always have sex.
As with most arguments here, nobody ever changes their viewpoints. It's just the same rigid people dictating to others how they should live their lives.
Why don't men get a choice. What about our body and our rights, should be a form women sign saying they want to keep the baby and take sole responsibility for it and the male(dad) is not responsible for anything. Instead she can ban the male from seeing the child and have the government forcibly take his money and if he makes no money lock him in prison.
Mikah wrote:
Quote:
Say nothing else about this topic ever
Welp I'm going to. The nature of the conception nor the genes of the rapist give you the right to kill the child. My body this, my body that... as soon as conception occurs, it is no longer entirely your own body I am afraid.
A general rule on the topic of abortion: if it's immoral to kill a child outside of the womb for any given reason, it is just as immoral to kill them inside the womb for the same reason. You wouldn't bash a 4 year olds head in because they were conceived of rape, so it's not ok to do that before they are born.
f**k YOU. I hope you get raped and have to deal with a pregnancy because of it, you inhuman piece of s**t.
Oh that's right, you could never be made pregnant by rape because you don't have a uterus. so SHUT THE f**k UP.
This thread is done.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
French lawmakers make abortion a constitutional right |
04 Mar 2024, 7:31 pm |
OK bill would charge abortion recipients with murder |
14 Feb 2024, 12:04 pm |
SCOTUS abortion pill access hearing |
26 Mar 2024, 5:17 pm |
Arizona state House passes bill to repeal 1864 abortion ban |
Today, 4:22 pm |