Very irritated with people who criticize Abortion

Page 5 of 5 [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,554
Location: Stalag 13

03 Nov 2015, 7:49 pm

Perhaps I went a little overboard this morning. What I should have said is that people should consider whether they'd be happy with any child that God gives them, even a handicapped. If not, than they should consider adoption.


_________________
Who wants to adopt a Sweet Pea?


Barchan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 846

03 Nov 2015, 9:56 pm

CockneyRebel wrote:
Perhaps I went a little overboard this morning. What I should have said is that people should consider whether they'd be happy with any child that God gives them, even a handicapped. If not, than they should consider adoption.


If you're going to play the God card, then I should say that not all religions believe life begins at conception. For example, Muslims have understood since the 7th century that the human embryo does not possess a soul until it is 120 days old. This is pretty close to what modern medicine has dictated (life begins at approximately 24 weeks).



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

03 Nov 2015, 11:39 pm

smudge wrote:
I'm totally with nurseangela. So if a prostitute had a baby she would have to care for it, even though the man was responsible for impregnating her in the first place, and HAD A CHOICE HIMSELF not to get involved in something irresponsible. Yes, how convenient for the man. And a completely horrendous situation for the woman. After all she gets 100% blame either way from you, even though it was you who impregnated her, ruining her life (assuming according she *had* to keep the baby), but hey for you it was a jolly good time. Who gives a damn about the prozzie and her kid now anyway?

As regards to the "don't have sex then" argument...that is just unbelievable too. No matter how much you try to force your morals on other people, they will always have sex.

As with most arguments here, nobody ever changes their viewpoints. It's just the same rigid people dictating to others how they should live their lives.


Why don't men get a choice. What about our body and our rights, should be a form women sign saying they want to keep the baby and take sole responsibility for it and the male(dad) is not responsible for anything. Instead she can ban the male from seeing the child and have the government forcibly take his money and if he makes no money lock him in prison.



wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

04 Nov 2015, 1:46 pm

Mikah wrote:
Quote:
Say nothing else about this topic ever


Welp I'm going to. The nature of the conception nor the genes of the rapist give you the right to kill the child. My body this, my body that... as soon as conception occurs, it is no longer entirely your own body I am afraid.

A general rule on the topic of abortion: if it's immoral to kill a child outside of the womb for any given reason, it is just as immoral to kill them inside the womb for the same reason. You wouldn't bash a 4 year olds head in because they were conceived of rape, so it's not ok to do that before they are born.


f**k YOU. I hope you get raped and have to deal with a pregnancy because of it, you inhuman piece of s**t.

Oh that's right, you could never be made pregnant by rape because you don't have a uterus. so SHUT THE f**k UP.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

04 Nov 2015, 1:47 pm

This thread is done.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)