Very irritated with people who criticize Abortion

Page 4 of 5 [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

nurseangela
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,017
Location: Kansas

03 Nov 2015, 9:50 am

Neotenous Nordic wrote:
I am celibate because if I were to have sex I had to know for a fact that the woman wouldn't go ahead and have an abortion.

That means if I find a girl I like, I can't get carried away in the moment. I have to evaluate her and her views over a long period of time to determine what her views are on abortion.

This makes most women lose interest. But I'd rather have it that way than to have one get pregnant only to have an abortion because she decided to. I would be devastated.

I could not handle that. I have friends who said they were to have a baby, but then they lost it through miscarraige. Just that alone devastates me. Don't know how I'd feel if someone went ahead and did it on purpose.

I don't understand how someone can detach so much as to be unaffected by the termination of a life like that. I can barely talk about it without choking up.


And aren't you in the prostitution thread too?! Saying how prostitution should "be a woman's right"? OMG! I'M LIVID! So it's only a woman's choice if your pleasure is involved? Is that right?! You make me sick to my stomach.


_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.


nurseangela
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,017
Location: Kansas

03 Nov 2015, 9:56 am

Jacoby wrote:
nurseangela wrote:
nurseangela wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
wilburforce wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Either you believe it is a life or you don't, I do and think all life should be protected. That is what it always comes down to, I do find the whole "we're better off with them dead" to be rather distasteful argument but I suppose it makes sense considering the fate you've drawn for yourself. When you choose to bring life into the world you should be responsible for it, it's not some big surprise that nobody can plan against. You should heed the implications of your actions; inconvenience on your part does not justify murder, not everything has a golden parachute or bail out. I believe exceptions for rape and the life of the mother are still consistent with my beliefs.


What about someone who practiced safe sex but still got pregnant? No BC method is 100%, so there will always be cases when, even when someone is very careful, they could still get pregnant. Does that mean everyone should stop having sex unless they want kids? Banning abortion just isn't practical in an adult population that isn't celibate.

It is a risk inherent in the activity, police yourself and understand the potential implications of your actions and it shouldn't be a problem. Abortion as birth control is as immoral as it can get, if you create life then you should be responsible for it. Man or woman. How can child support and abortion both exist? A man can end up in prison for not paying child support, why is it okay for a mother to murder her unborn child?


Dude, you're in one thread talking to women about morality and abortion then you're in another thread saying that prostitution shouldn't be immoral and guys shouldn't be judged for using prostitutes. How two-faced can you get?! You're talking out of both sides of your mouth! Who is judging now?! I suggest cleaning up your own house first before throwing stones at someone else! It's guys like you that really piss me off!


You better be ready to become a father if you make a prostitute pregnant! Just keep that in mind or are you planning to leave her high and dry? I'm so mad I could spit fire! It's men who don't have to worry about getting pregnant, isn't it? It's easy to have sex and just leave any problems behind. It takes a REAL MAN to be responsible. You're just a boy trying to fill a man's shoes. Grow up!


I can defend what I want, lets not get the issue confused when one deals with murdering babies and the other some financial transaction with consenting adults. Guess which one is illegal and the other government subsidized? Murder, kind of universally or I guess not so universally, is considered immoral by whatever flavor you go by so I don't see the two being comparable.


It's comparable in the morality department. You expect women to have morals when it comes to abortion, but you don't have to when it comes to something others consider immoral - prostitution. Are you going to make the prostitute a respectable woman if you make her pregnant? Or do you think morals don't apply to you?


_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.


XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

03 Nov 2015, 10:03 am

[MODERATOR]

I understand that this is a controversial topic, but personal attacks are not permitted, even in PPR.

Attack the argument, not the person making it.

If this thread degenerates further, it will be locked.

[/MODERATOR]


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

03 Nov 2015, 10:04 am

@nurseangela

Abortion is not on the same moral playing field as getting a tattoo or selling your body, there is another human life in the equation.



nurseangela
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,017
Location: Kansas

03 Nov 2015, 10:10 am

Not a problem because I'm done here.

I don't understand how to not make things personal when one is addressing someone else's comments. I thought addressing someone personally (even in anger) was only not permitted in the Haven. I guess I'm not understanding the rules. I've seen disagreements/arguments in several threads. It probably should be expected when discussing such topics as abortion, religion, etc.


_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

03 Nov 2015, 10:17 am

nurseangela wrote:
It's comparable in the morality department. You expect women to have morals when it comes to abortion, but you don't have to when it comes to something others consider immoral - prostitution. Are you going to make the prostitute a respectable woman if you make her pregnant? Or do you think morals don't apply to you?


Well your idea of morality is not the same as mine, abortion and prostitution are not comparable considering the the harm principle. It is prohibition and the social ostracizing that causes the most harm to sex workers so I see my position actually as alleviating the problem and yours causing undue suffering specifically to women. I expect women not to murder their unborn child yes, I also do believe men should be responsible in supporting life they create as well, all parties equally responsible for their actions seems fair to me.



nurseangela
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,017
Location: Kansas

03 Nov 2015, 10:26 am

Mikah wrote:
@nurseangela

Abortion is not on the same moral playing field as getting a tattoo or selling your body, there is another human life in the equation.


I get that. I don't believe in abortion myself, however, I do believe that women should have a choice and men should be included in the choice if it is their baby. However, I don't like men saying its ok to have their "fun" and morality not be involved for them, but they want the women to be "moral" when it comes to sex and getting pregnant. It's the morality thing that is making me angry. And for one to judge someone else and say they're being immoral while the one who is judging is doing something just as immoral is sickening.

In regards to the abortion topic, the movie "Revolutionary Road" forced me to think more about women and abortion. Before it was legal, women would perform their own abortions and would puncture the uterus and end up dying from bleeding out. I see the abortion procedure as a necessity to stop women from killing themselves from "home abortion techniques". Each woman has to make the decision for themselves and live with that decision.


_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.


whatamess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,284

03 Nov 2015, 10:34 am

I am not against women having control over their own bodies, as far as I am concerned, they do have control. If you don't want to get pregnant, you don't have sex, it worked for me. It has worked for many. In fact, I am amazed that most people I know who are pro-abortion, who feel that it is the woman's right to choose, are also the first to blame men for getting women pregnant, who want to squeeze every single penny out of a guy because he fathered a child...but wait, I thought it was a woman's right to choose? To me, if you choose, you as a woman live with the consequences, I have no problem with that. That means you have a right to close your legs, you have a right to open them and get pregnant and have an abortion, you have the right to keep the baby and support it yourself as well, NOT that you get to choose what happens and then have everyone cater to what you want, that is being irresponsible.

As far as this:

"Do pro-lifers know what happens when an unborn baby is born to a poor or drug addicted teenage mother, who just make a mistake (like many young people do)? Well, what happens to the baby, is that it grows up unloved, abused, neglected, and watches its mother get mistreated, used, and abused by bad men - unwanted children who grew up. The unwanted child then carries this trauma and anger with him throughout his entire life, and expresses that anger by abusing others and repeating the same cycle, and most likely having an unwanted child of their own, who will then repeat the cycle."

The fact is that many of the women who have abortions are NOT the drug addicted teenage mothers, they have the kids so they can collect money from the government, abuse their kids, etc. Go figure. By the way, they also have the option of giving up kids for adoption, but choose not to, because they'd rather abuse their own kids and have someone else pay their way in life.

And yes, I do believe abortion is murder as well. If someone wants an abortion and the state allows it, fine. Then let's make sure that person NEVER can get pregnant again either. The fact is that if someone has an abortion and therefore, no respect for human life once, they will never have respect for human life and therefore, should not be allowed to ever get pregnant again.

As far as assisted suicide? I think each person should have control over THEIR OWN BODY...no problem with that.

PS when I say you, I don't mean you personally ;-), that's just the way I write



Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

03 Nov 2015, 10:43 am

Quote:
In regards to the abortion topic, the movie "Revolutionary Road" forced me to think more about women and abortion. Before it was legal, women would perform their own abortions and would puncture the uterus and end up dying from bleeding out. I see the abortion procedure as a necessity to stop women from killing themselves from "home abortion techniques". Each woman has to make the decision for themselves and live with that decision.


I understand, it's sad that such things would occur if abortion was outlawed and I'm sure they would. But perhaps that is the price we have to pay for a system where it is not acceptable to kill an unborn child except under extreme circumstances. There will never be a perfect system and currently the price we pay in terms of potential lives extinguished is astounding. In my own country it's between 100000 and 200000 a year.

At this point in the argument people often say well if there are x babies aborted a year and you outlaw it then there will be x number of women going to illegal clinics or performing x number of DIY abortions. I disagree. The law is a powerful deterrent if enforced correctly. The number of unwanted pregnancies would go down as women took more care against pregnancy, most of those who did get pregnant would most likely carry to term and give up the child for adoption. Only a small fraction would take the sad route you talk of.



Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

03 Nov 2015, 11:08 am

Quote:
I am amazed that most people I know who are pro-abortion, who feel that it is the woman's right to choose


This is the main problem with the debate, it was cleverly framed right from the early days as a problem of women's choice and bodily autonomy, not as a problem of life and death. To this day people who oppose abortion are smeared as anti-woman not anti-child murder. You can tell something is wrong with the "woman's choice" approach because of all the mental gymnastics you have to perform to try and find a solid moral footing.

e.g. currently the limit is set around 24 weeks give or take, roughly when babies can go into neonatal care and survive. Yet no doctor in the world would induce labour prematurely or perform a caesarian after this point unless there were medical reasons because it is unnecessarily risky for the child and mother. Once the baby is past that magical cut-off, the mother is legally obligated to carry to term, where does her choice go then and why does no one complain?
If it's ok to tell a woman her choices end at week 24, why is it wrong to tell her that her choices end at conception? If it's not ok, why should there a limit at all?



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,547
Location: Stalag 13

03 Nov 2015, 11:17 am

If you don't like children, don't have sex. If you don't like handicapped people, don't have sex. That's a good way to avoid an abortion.


_________________
Who wants to adopt a Sweet Pea?


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,194
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

03 Nov 2015, 12:20 pm

cathylynn wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
One thing I can't help but think with this;

It seems like the sophistication of what's developing has a significant role in just how human it generally gets considered. For instance I'm sure there's a lot more people who are against late-term abortion than there are who are against the morning after pill being used or first-trimester terminations.

I have to ask though, outside of extreme medical cases such as when mother or both mother and baby would die - is there a meaningful justification for third trimester abortion? I'd think a rape victim who's not chained up in a cabin is probably going to go out to get help as fast as she can both legally and with respect to making sure she's not pregnant. If she had her doubts that anything culminated from the experience and starts seeing signs that she's pregnant, okay, we're still pretty early in the situation. Seven or eight months in though I'm not sure I can get my mind wrapped around that kind of delay.

I know - I'm a dude, it's not my body, but I can't help but sense that there's a creeping gradient of perception between a medical procedure vs. getting to where a particular girl I went to high school went with this logic - had a baby at home, smothered it, tossed it out in a black garbage bag, and did seven years at county. To think if she'd gone to a clinic just a couple days earlier the whole thing could have been above board.

In that sense I'd really suggest the ladies not be too dismissive of this topic as a dunce or misogynistic concern, ie. it does seem like there's something a bit bigger going on with this than what goes on in a bedroom - it's actually hitting a fair bit closer to core ontological issues we have about the value of human life in general.


abortions are illegal at viability with the exception of saving the life of the mother, so the situation you describe does not exist.


Except that that's not the sum total of my post. The thing I see here is that the abortion debate seems to be quite often between the ragingly theistic on one side and the sociologically tone-deaf on the other (at least those who want to shout out at the top of their lungs that it's a meaningless appendage until first breath).


_________________
“Love takes off the masks that we fear we cannot live without and know we cannot live within. I use the word "love" here not merely in the personal sense but as a state of being, or a state of grace - not in the infantile American sense of being made happy but in the tough and universal sense of quest and daring and growth.” - James Baldwin


wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

03 Nov 2015, 3:48 pm

Mikah wrote:
I struggled with this one for some time. Eventually I concluded that almost all abortion carried out today is immoral.
Some retorts to the usual arguments:

Those who say unborn children feel no pain so it's ok - this is not an argument. There are ways to kill adults such that there is no physical pain nor suffering through foreknowledge. Here's a thought experiment: if I could kill you in such a way for no good reason why would it be wrong? Hint: I'm depriving you of future experience.

Next that a baby at whatever stage of development is not fully human because it can't think/socialise/order a pizza etc. Whatever definitions of human life or non-life you want to introduce to the argument no one will argue that this "bundle of cells" will not later become a human with those characteristics unless there are extenuating natural circumstances or you interfere violently with the pregnancy through abortion. As far as I can see the life of a human begins at conception. That first fertilised cell is just an earlier stage of human development, much as a toddler is an earlier stage of development compared to a teenager as a teenager is to an adult.

People often jump to extreme examples when discussing this, I think it's moot unless abortion in general is considered immoral, but anyway:

Child will have terrible life because mom/dad is terrible person: this isn't our call to make, nor is it the mother's. Many people have raised themselves from terrible circumstances. Adoption would be preferable to snuffing out the child in this case surely?

Child will be deformed, stupid or otherwise imperfect: same as above really, but this one is a bit more sinister, it's really not the call of the mother or society at large to decide whether lives are worth living. It's entirely subjective. Short lives are not automatically pointless, same for lives with much pain, trial and suffering. The only person who can say is the person living it and often only as they approach the end of their life. I said this one is more sinister because you can take it so far in the other direction. What if the child will be a bit ugly? Or perhaps mildly autistic? If the parents don't want an imperfect child - adoption again seems like a fine alternative.

Child of rape. Sins of the father.... No I don't think this is justified either. What if the mother carries to term, is she at any point thereafter permitted to kill the child because of how they were conceived? Adoption again seems like the way to go.

Life of the mother is in immediate danger and treatment will kill the baby: This is the one instance I can think of where it is justifiable. There is no right call in this scenario - it's up to the mother.

Quote:
if you don't like abortion, don't have one.


Ridiculous slogan. If you don't like murder, don't commit one.


Have you ever been raped yourself? If not you can keep your opinion about what a woman should do with the result of a rape in her own body to yourself, thank you very much. Say nothing else about this topic ever because as a rape survivor I am telling you it is not something you should voice to others as you have no idea what you are talking about. You can't tell me I have to keep a rapist's sperm inside my body and let it create a person that is half-rapist inside my body, and I think it's terrible and disgusting and inhumanly un-empathetic to even suggest that. I am literally feeling nauseous from you suggesting that, it's that revolting and disgusting. It makes my skin crawl. Thanks for that.



wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

03 Nov 2015, 3:54 pm

CockneyRebel wrote:
If you don't like children, don't have sex. If you don't like handicapped people, don't have sex. That's a good way to avoid an abortion.


People who are made pregnant by rape don't have the choice of not having sex, the sex was forced on them! Why can't people acknowledge this??!?!? I did not CHOOSE my pregnancy scare after being raped at 18!! !! !! !! !! THAT CHOICE WAS TAKEN AWAY FROM ME BECAUSE SOMEONE USED MY BODY WITHOUT MY PERMISSION. IT IS MY CHOICE WHAT I DO WITH THE RESULT!! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!



smudge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Sep 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,716
Location: Moved on

03 Nov 2015, 4:19 pm

I'm totally with nurseangela. So if a prostitute had a baby she would have to care for it, even though the man was responsible for impregnating her in the first place, and HAD A CHOICE HIMSELF not to get involved in something irresponsible. Yes, how convenient for the man. And a completely horrendous situation for the woman. After all she gets 100% blame either way from you, even though it was you who impregnated her, ruining her life (assuming according she *had* to keep the baby), but hey for you it was a jolly good time. Who gives a damn about the prozzie and her kid now anyway?

As regards to the "don't have sex then" argument...that is just unbelievable too. No matter how much you try to force your morals on other people, they will always have sex.

As with most arguments here, nobody ever changes their viewpoints. It's just the same rigid people dictating to others how they should live their lives.


_________________
I've left WP.


Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

03 Nov 2015, 6:49 pm

Quote:
Say nothing else about this topic ever


Welp I'm going to. The nature of the conception nor the genes of the rapist give you the right to kill the child. My body this, my body that... as soon as conception occurs, it is no longer entirely your own body I am afraid.

A general rule on the topic of abortion: if it's immoral to kill a child outside of the womb for any given reason, it is just as immoral to kill them inside the womb for the same reason. You wouldn't bash a 4 year olds head in because they were conceived of rape, so it's not ok to do that before they are born.