Page 32 of 49 [ 777 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ... 49  Next

RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,970
Location: Adelaide, Australia

13 Sep 2018, 4:36 pm

auntblabby wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
When the democratic socialists talk about taxing the rich, how exactly would the revenue be allocated?

like how they do it in the Scandinavian countries, mostly for society's benefit in general.

But Scandinavian countries aren't truly socialist. They have corporations like Ikea and Nokia. Remember that the definition of socialism is the means of production belong to the community as a whole.

In a truly socialist country it wouldn't be a question of how much to tax the rich, it would be a question of weather to send the rich to the collective farms or the collective factories.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

13 Sep 2018, 5:34 pm

Tim_Tex wrote:
When the democratic socialists talk about taxing the rich, how exactly would the revenue be allocated?

By congress. On things we need like health care and education.



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

13 Sep 2018, 8:23 pm

Tim_Tex wrote:
When the democratic socialists talk about taxing the rich, how exactly would the revenue be allocated?

They mostly talk about raising taxes on low and middle income workers.


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.


AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

14 Sep 2018, 9:03 am

LoveNotHate wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
When the democratic socialists talk about taxing the rich, how exactly would the revenue be allocated?

They mostly talk about raising taxes on low and middle income workers.

That's BS. Democratic Socialists believe in a progressive tax that is heavily weighted towards the very rich. I guess the GOP can't win these days without lying. I mean they JUST gave away billions of dollars to the rich with their tax "reform" (theft). It's not like we don't read the news.



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am

AspE wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
When the democratic socialists talk about taxing the rich, how exactly would the revenue be allocated?

They mostly talk about raising taxes on low and middle income workers.

That's BS. Democratic Socialists believe in a progressive tax that is heavily weighted towards the very rich. I guess the GOP can't win these days without lying. I mean they JUST gave away billions of dollars to the rich with their tax "reform" (theft). It's not like we don't read the news.

Maybe, but this is about what they talk about.

What they talk about is .... taxes they want to raise on poor and middle class people.

-2.2% raise tax brackets on all income levels
-payroll tax for medical care
-payroll tax for family leave
-carbon tax (which is passed onto consumers)
-oil tax (which is passed onto consumers)
-increase corporate taxes (which is passed onto consumers)
-stock transaction tax (essentially a new sales tax on financial transactions)

Which of course, is why their ideas are dead.

Image


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.


AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

14 Sep 2018, 1:32 pm

More lies. Building the middle class is what the movement is ALL about. Thinking that reducing corporate taxes will decrease the burden on consumers is a damn lie. That money goes right into the pockets of the rich who are getting richer while our wages stagnate. And then they use it to buy politicians who pass more laws to help the rich. This can't continue if we still want a Democracy.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,735
Location: the island of defective toy santas

14 Sep 2018, 3:32 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
-stock transaction tax (essentially a new sales tax on financial transactions)


that doesn't affect working class people who by and large can't afford to do the stock market in the first place.



RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,970
Location: Adelaide, Australia

14 Sep 2018, 5:47 pm

auntblabby wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
-stock transaction tax (essentially a new sales tax on financial transactions)


that doesn't affect working class people who by and large can't afford to do the stock market in the first place.


A stock transaction tax would level the playing field. It would mean that people succeed from their won work instead of someone else's.

It would also make discourage people from frivolous speculation, which can drive stock prices over and above their actual value, which can lead to events like the crash of '29.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,735
Location: the island of defective toy santas

14 Sep 2018, 7:28 pm

RetroGamer87 wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
-stock transaction tax (essentially a new sales tax on financial transactions)


that doesn't affect working class people who by and large can't afford to do the stock market in the first place.


A stock transaction tax would level the playing field. It would mean that people succeed from their won work instead of someone else's.

It would also make discourage people from frivolous speculation, which can drive stock prices over and above their actual value, which can lead to events like the crash of '29.

the right wing here wants anything but a level playing field, they want it overwhelmingly tilted in their direction for their exclusive benefit, "winner take all."



Shrapnel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 555

15 Sep 2018, 9:56 am

Q: What did socialists use before candles?

A: Electricity.



Mythos
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 457
Location: England

15 Sep 2018, 2:06 pm

RetroGamer87 wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Tim_Tex wrote:
When the democratic socialists talk about taxing the rich, how exactly would the revenue be allocated?

like how they do it in the Scandinavian countries, mostly for society's benefit in general.

But Scandinavian countries aren't truly socialist. They have corporations like Ikea and Nokia. Remember that the definition of socialism is the means of production belong to the community as a whole.

In a truly socialist country it wouldn't be a question of how much to tax the rich, it would be a question of weather to send the rich to the collective farms or the collective factories.
That's what my understanding of market socialism is. I'd call Scandinavian nations market socialist nations. Though they probably are more capitalist than that, in all honesty.

That being said, I don't think people who self identify as socialist want to completely abolish capitalism. It's a means of implementing socialist ideals which will often be to the benefit of the poorer classes, granted the upper classes may not face such stability.



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 45,529
Location: Houston, Texas

15 Sep 2018, 7:07 pm

What are the DSers’ industrial development plans like?


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

16 Sep 2018, 4:30 am

Bad Economic Policies Kill More Children than War

Recent reports that infants now die at a higher rate in Venezuela than in war-torn Syria were, sadly, unsurprising—the results of socialist economics are predictable. Venezuela’s infant mortality rate has actually been above Syria’s since 2008.

The big picture, fortunately, is happier. The global infant mortality rate has plummeted. Even Syria and Venezuela, despite the impact of war and failed policies, saw improvements up to as recently as last year. From 1960 to 2015, Syria’s infant mortality rate fell by 91% and Venezuela’s by 78%. This year (not reflected in the graph above or below), Syria’s rate rose from 11.1 per 1,000 live births to 15.4, while Venezuela’s shot up from 12.9 to 18.6. Meanwhile, infant mortality rates have continued to fall practically everywhere else, and have declined even faster in countries that enjoy more freedom and stability.


https://humanprogress.org/article.php?p=439


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


Biscuitman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,665
Location: Dunking jammy dodgers

16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am

Darmok wrote:
Bad Economic Policies Kill More Children than War

Recent reports that infants now die at a higher rate in Venezuela than in war-torn Syria were, sadly, unsurprising—the results of socialist economics are predictable. Venezuela’s infant mortality rate has actually been above Syria’s since 2008.

The big picture, fortunately, is happier. The global infant mortality rate has plummeted. Even Syria and Venezuela, despite the impact of war and failed policies, saw improvements up to as recently as last year. From 1960 to 2015, Syria’s infant mortality rate fell by 91% and Venezuela’s by 78%. This year (not reflected in the graph above or below), Syria’s rate rose from 11.1 per 1,000 live births to 15.4, while Venezuela’s shot up from 12.9 to 18.6. Meanwhile, infant mortality rates have continued to fall practically everywhere else, and have declined even faster in countries that enjoy more freedom and stability.


https://humanprogress.org/article.php?p=439


Hard to know whether we can believe what you post anymore tbh



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

16 Sep 2018, 11:26 am

auntblabby wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
-stock transaction tax (essentially a new sales tax on financial transactions)


that doesn't affect working class people who by and large can't afford to do the stock market in the first place.

It affects anyone with a retirement plan at work.

It affects middle class people who save and invest.


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.