TheSpectrum wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
If you meant to make a perfect equivalence of the other thread, you should have said "Aside from eggs, What Good Are Women?" and the thread had to be started by a female member.
I wouldn't even care about the gender of the poster if it wasnt only good for sex
I seem to recall you being rather amused at the idea of a bunch of naked men running around in a field like wild animals for you to herd up, and not taking offence to the other thread in general. Much like the guys in that thread, you enabled it (most likely because you didn't care and neither did we).
Dressing up your sentiments here or trying to rationalise bias doesn't make it any less of a bias.
Take offence or claim to be offended if you want to but you can't have your cake and eat it.
Boo came up with the idea first as a joke. And because I thought it was a ridiculous so I joked about with him. We both understood is was a ridiculous idea and would never want it to happen.
I am allowed to be offended about women being only good for sex but as the op has apologised I'll let it go.
I am allowed to have bad experiences with men wondering have used me for sex
And you can be offended by a joke both males and females were joking about.
Also please explain how I'm 'having my cake and eating'? Considering I stuck up for guys originally in that thread.
All I wanted to do was explain my side to the op which I have and he said sorry to offend anyone which I accept now and realise he wasn't trying to be mean.
Am I not allowed to explain my point of view? Or my personal experience? Which one is it?