Dillogic wrote:
0regonGuy wrote:
I also love the justification that six people were killed not by cops. So whats wrong with the cops killing another one. The cops just want to ket in on the killing too.
The implication is that they should by logic, riot over the homicides in their own community too. It shows that they have bias here (the ones destroying their own home that is; I'm sure there's plenty of people in that community that think the rioters are stupid). Perspective is a good thing to have.
As of now, there's no evidence to say the police shooting was a murder. So, there's no actual reason to call for vigilantism yet. Not to mention looting and burning down businesses that have nothing to do with the officer in the shooting, has zero justification.
To me, it just looks like some thugs jumped onto a reason to loot, assault and commit arson.
BLM, with its faults, has some good intentions. That wasn't BLM.
They need to do a lot more then just rioting. We need a revolution in this country, to get our constitutional rights back and make the police stop pulling people over for dumb reasons, searching people's cars without warrants, and even executing people without trials.
As far as there being no evidence the police shooting was a murder, that's because we only have the police version of what happened, and the police lie more often then they tell the truth. When was the last time the police came out and said, "yep we murdered the guy."? It happens but only when there is video evidence, and even then they still lie about it. The police have zero credibility. There is no reason to believe them now.