That article is also worth a read. I want to say you're killin' me, but that would be hyperbolic. I can take their argument apart and dispute things, but focusing on that would miss your point. It would probably also stop me from learning anything new from the article, so it hardly seems worthwhile.
I really hope that this represents a new commitment by the new Trump voters to get involved in politics. I hope they keep an eye on the results of their choices and voice their enthusiasm or resentment. Realistically, I'll feel overjoyed if we break records for turnout in the midterm elections, whatever the results.
Ironically, the voter registration restrictions have had a backlash effect in some places. I try to stay hopeful.
Another way that Trump might break with convention in an interesting way is with the idea that MLKIII discussed in his meeting with Trump, a national ID that is easy for every American to get. That will eliminate a lot of the voter fraud/disenfranchisement argument. I haven't heard the idea floated in 20 years, but I remember conservatives railing against it, locally in TX all the time and occasionally on national shows. I think Pat Buchanan is opposed, but not sure.
Edit: Just remembered, Natl ID morphed into Natl requirements for the states. Texas sued to stop it.
_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade