Page 4 of 6 [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Nov 2017, 9:13 pm

Daniel89 wrote:
Public services and benefits are not socialist. Socialism is the means of production being socially owned either by the workers directly or society at whole. People often call the Nordic countries socialist they are capitalist market based economies.


Absolute capitalism frowns on such services.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

24 Nov 2017, 9:22 pm

I don't even know what absolute capitalism means. Capitalism is merely the private ownership of property. The countries with the best public services generate that money from private enterprises and not through state management of the economy.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Nov 2017, 9:29 pm

Daniel89 wrote:
I don't even know what absolute capitalism means. Capitalism is merely the private ownership of property. The countries with the best public services generate that money from private enterprises and not through state management of the economy.


When the legal system and the political establishment are geared to the benefit of big corporations reaping all the benefits of capitalism, while the rest of us are allowed to be exploited at the hands of said big corporations, and gain none of the benefits.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

24 Nov 2017, 9:31 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Daniel89 wrote:
I don't even know what absolute capitalism means. Capitalism is merely the private ownership of property. The countries with the best public services generate that money from private enterprises and not through state management of the economy.


When the legal system and the political establishment are geared to the benefit of big corporations reaping all the benefits of capitalism, while the rest of us are allowed to be exploited but gain none of the benefits.


I would call that corruption, it happens in every economic system less so in capitalism though.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm

Daniel89 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Daniel89 wrote:
I don't even know what absolute capitalism means. Capitalism is merely the private ownership of property. The countries with the best public services generate that money from private enterprises and not through state management of the economy.


When the legal system and the political establishment are geared to the benefit of big corporations reaping all the benefits of capitalism, while the rest of us are allowed to be exploited but gain none of the benefits.


I would call that corruption, it happens in every economic system less so in capitalism though.


That's been the history of industrialized societies when the forces that be have cracked down on workers rights and labor laws. We saw that prior to the rise of organized labor, and we saw it again with Reagan when he cracked down on working families for the benefit of corporate America, the legacy which we are still living with today.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

25 Nov 2017, 7:15 am

And most of us didn't have rights prior to industrialisation. The aristocracy to this day still have a huge amount of influence in the UK but if we never had the industrial revolution they would still be flat out running the place.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

25 Nov 2017, 3:21 pm

Daniel89 wrote:
And most of us didn't have rights prior to industrialisation. The aristocracy to this day still have a huge amount of influence in the UK but if we never had the industrial revolution they would still be flat out running the place.


A new class of aristocracy - one of corporate wealth and financial power - arose due to industrialization. And this new class would have been more than happy to keep everyone else under foot were it not for organized labor and social justice groups fighting them.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

25 Nov 2017, 4:32 pm

The majority of Aristocrats did actually make money from the industrial revolution since they were the ones who had capital to invest. But during the industrial revolution this is the first time any rich people actually cared about the poor here in Britain the most notable examples I can think of are William Leverhulme, Joseph Rowntree and the Cadbury family. Whilst we may live under corrupt governments now we are not slaves and we were prior to capitalism.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

25 Nov 2017, 4:42 pm

Daniel89 wrote:
The majority of Aristocrats did actually make money from the industrial revolution since they were the ones who had capital to invest. But during the industrial revolution this is the first time any rich people actually cared about the poor here in Britain the most notable examples I can think of are William Leverhulme, Joseph Rowntree and the Cadbury family. Whilst we may live under corrupt governments now we are not slaves and we were prior to capitalism.


If you say so about Britain. Here in America, industrialists saw paying their workers as a necessary evil, and so saw to it that wages were as low as possible. They didn't give a crap about their workers, and only payed higher wages with benefits, and allowed for organized labor because the government forced them to for the benefit of said workers.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

25 Nov 2017, 5:10 pm

Yeah there are bad people in every system and most of them were bad in Britain. Within the capitalism system people can protests businesses, boycott them, unionise, get the government to pass regulations etc. Within a socialist/communist system the bad people in government can stop you protesting, they can arrest you criticising them, kill you maybe even your family. No system is perfect or maybe even no system is good but capitalism allows power to be somewhat distributed and people can still vote with their feet.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

25 Nov 2017, 9:31 pm

Daniel89 wrote:
Yeah there are bad people in every system and most of them were bad in Britain. Within the capitalism system people can protests businesses, boycott them, unionise, get the government to pass regulations etc. Within a socialist/communist system the bad people in government can stop you protesting, they can arrest you criticising them, kill you maybe even your family. No system is perfect or maybe even no system is good but capitalism allows power to be somewhat distributed and people can still vote with their feet.


A country can be democratic and socialist as well, while countries practicing free enterprise have been totalitarian.
You can vote with your feet, but too often that might mean you get to starve, especially if you were black listed. Better that people unionize and get what they want.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

26 Nov 2017, 9:03 am

But a country where all the power is vested in government can easily cease being democratic.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

26 Nov 2017, 5:19 pm

Daniel89 wrote:
But a country where all the power is vested in government can easily cease being democratic.


A country where corporations are so powerful as to control government also can be freedom destroying.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

26 Nov 2017, 7:09 pm

That's also true but you can at least boycott companies you cannot boycott the government. Companies can only really come very powerful through making something is extremely beneficial to society (which is a rarity) or by bribing a government to obey them (which is more common). I am very concerned with the whole net neutrality thing coming out of America, big business and big government working together is very scary at first they will use it to censor their competition but eventually it will be used to censor political opinions they don't like. I think a salient example of this is Merkle's hot mic moment with Zuckerberg wanting to censor people who criticise her refugee policy or the banks in France shutting Le pens bank accounts.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

26 Nov 2017, 9:12 pm

Daniel89 wrote:
That's also true but you can at least boycott companies you cannot boycott the government. Companies can only really come very powerful through making something is extremely beneficial to society (which is a rarity) or by bribing a government to obey them (which is more common). I am very concerned with the whole net neutrality thing coming out of America, big business and big government working together is very scary at first they will use it to censor their competition but eventually it will be used to censor political opinions they don't like. I think a salient example of this is Merkle's hot mic moment with Zuckerberg wanting to censor people who criticise her refugee policy or the banks in France shutting Le pens bank accounts.


In a democracy, you can boycott the current government by voting them out.
I don't think political critics should ever be silenced, though cutting off the Le Pens from their bank accounts sounds deliciously funny! :twisted:


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Daniel89
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,592

26 Nov 2017, 9:29 pm

Except when there is a political monopoly like there is in the UK and US were two parties absolutely dominate and your choice is merely a choice of the lesser evils.