Why is nazism so popular?

Post Reply New Topic

Yes, the same people who supported the destruction of Libya especially support mass immigration into the West even though the leader of Libya warned against it. Gee, I wonder if that's important. Also, that means you see no difference between immigrants and refugees.

Strange, given that people on the right get the same violent threats as those on the left.

What the hell are you talking about? Most far right leaders now are strong Zionists who just hate Arab Muslims.

There is a huge difference between passing a law and "rubbing their noses in it". You should know this.

I'm glad that Tony Blair wants to give those EDL hooligans what they deserve.



Are you allergic to research or are you just gobbling up Islamophobic propaganda?



As you can see, Syria is a key contributor to the refugee crisis.

Kosovo is also a key player because the people of Kosovo fear that the Serbs might try to conquer them.



HAHAHA Oh wow!

Some Native American reservations don't even have electricity or running water. The Native Americans have been complaining about this for years but the US government doesn't give a damn.

Are you sure you aren't an alt-righter? Most of the people who play the "Native Americans are parasites." card are alt-righters.



People who are that poor can't afford to move. That's why most people who immigrate to the West are not wage slaves, but people who have been threatened with violence.



Move to Iceland then.



Kosovo is actually second because of their tense relationship with Serbia.

... except that most neo-Nazis still hate Jews more than anyone else.

The EDL didn't even exist during the Blair years. What exactly do they deserve and why?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... Syria.html

Most of them are not from Syria and even the ones who are are economic migrants.

I didn't call Native Americans parasites I stated they were already getting money from the US government which they are.

What evidence do you have that most who come to the west have done so because of threats? They come for economic reasons they take out loans, they sell family land. If people didn't emigrate for economic reasons then why do Indians move to countries like UAE, Qatar and Saudi Arabia where they are going to be treated appallingly?

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail





The people of Syria are currently threatened by Islamists as well as their own government. It isn't safe.



Indians don't get treated appallingly in the Middle East. Most of the Indian people in the Middle East are travelling entrepreneurs. Some of the wealthiest people in the Middle East are Indian businessmen.

The Dailymail was using EU statistics.

We have a few thousand Syrian immigrants here in the UK and millions who are not from Syria.

Are you being serious Indians don't get treated appallingly in the middle east? They take away their passports pay them less than they told them they would. You are a very ignorant person.

Polls can tell you anything you want them to tell you, hunting for one to give you the answer you want is weak stuff.

Also, 47% is not a majority.

Its not a majority because there were free options for, against and don't know. If the general public were no so ignorant about Islam then it would be much higher.

What someone go tell the s it gun liberals this.

So now you insult the British public for having the audacity to not agree with you. Classy.

Lack of knowledge is not an opinion. Do you think the majority of the public know Muhammad was a paedophile,slave owning, a serial rapist, mass murdering warlord?

I think the majority of the British public know enough about religion to make their own minds up and come to their own conclusions about it. Just because they DARE to not agree with you about it doesn't mean they are wrong.

I'd be very surprised if the majority knew the depths of Muhammad's evil.

seems the ultimate sociopathy would be for somebody to make a religion in their name that makes people worship them. even if the don't call it a religion.

I guess we will just never know will we.

Are Islamophobes allergic to historical context?

Muhammad was a pedo by modern standards, but he was living in world in which it was normal for men to have sex with girls as soon as they were fertile.

Slavery was common in the Middle East at the time. Warlords were common as well.

Muhammad was against forced conversions. Therefore, he must have earned the respect of the Middle Eastern people. That's how his religion took off.

How did Muhammad earn respect? He argued that polygamy was only okay if you were capable of loving all of your wives equally. He rejected racism. He rejected ancestor worship because this was leading to perpetual tribal warfare, so he replaced all of those revered ancestors with a singular, indivisible deity. This united the Arabian Peninsula and reduced the amount of tribal warfare in the region.

Of course, none of this really matters because Muslims believe that Muhammad was a flawed human being, not a divine avatar. Muslims believe that Islam comes from God, and that Muhammad was merely a messenger.

... and then there's the fact that Jesus is mentioned in the Quran more times than Muhammad is. Muslims have tremendous respect for Jesus. This is why early Catholic leaders regarded Islam as a heresy of Christianity, rather than a separate religion entirely.