26 Mar 2018, 10:30 pm
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
26 Mar 2018, 10:37 pm
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Well she is a porn star pushing 40.
So would it be different if she was a dewy eyed teen starlet that Trump regularly molested at his beauty pageants
http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/art ... een-usa-c/
Yes, because she wouldn't be passed her professional prime and have the possible motivation of trying to maintain some time in the spotlight for fame and fortune despite the fact that she's 40 years old and no longer highly desirable to the porn industry.
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.26 Mar 2018, 10:50 pm
26 Mar 2018, 11:03 pm
26 Mar 2018, 11:08 pm
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
27 Mar 2018, 10:31 am
The best part of Stormy Daniels on 60 minutes?
She got better ratings than Trump! 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/busi ... tings.html
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,418
Location: Long Island, New York
27 Mar 2018, 11:11 am
goldfish21 wrote:
The best part of Stormy Daniels on 60 minutes?
She got better ratings than Trump!
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/busi ... tings.html
She got better ratings than Trump!
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/busi ... tings.html
sex combined with attractiveness sells, always has, always will.
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
27 Mar 2018, 3:45 pm
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Now the hush money deal, that's an issue.
That's what we've been saying in the 20+ page thread about this. I don't care that he banged a porn star. What matters is the $130K in hush money that amounts to an illegal campaign contribution intended to influence the outcome of the US Presidential election in Trump's favour.
Actually it was pointed out people were going on way to much the "affair".
Those people probably have difficulty getting laid & are jealous that a fat old man has enough money to seduce a porn star.
I think there's an overall attempt throughout social media to influence Trump's evangelical supporters, so that's why many are harping on the "affair" part of it.
I think that angle is more pointing out the hypocrisy of religious people who are blindly following & supporting a sinful adulterer.
No it doesn't because Jesus said unless you never committed a sin (specifically referring to someone accused of adultery at the time he said it), you have no right to condemn someone else for having committed a sin. The idea from a Christian standpoint is they're supposed to forgive him. If they hold it against him, then that's what would make them hypocrites.
So Trump is a Christian role model based on the he countless sins he commits & thus the best infinite opportunities they have to forgive him? 
Interesting perspective. Perhaps this is why so many so-called Christians are so accepting and supportive of pedophile priests, too.
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.27 Mar 2018, 9:13 pm
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Now the hush money deal, that's an issue.
That's what we've been saying in the 20+ page thread about this. I don't care that he banged a porn star. What matters is the $130K in hush money that amounts to an illegal campaign contribution intended to influence the outcome of the US Presidential election in Trump's favour.
Actually it was pointed out people were going on way to much the "affair".
Those people probably have difficulty getting laid & are jealous that a fat old man has enough money to seduce a porn star.
I think there's an overall attempt throughout social media to influence Trump's evangelical supporters, so that's why many are harping on the "affair" part of it.
I think that angle is more pointing out the hypocrisy of religious people who are blindly following & supporting a sinful adulterer.
No it doesn't because Jesus said unless you never committed a sin (specifically referring to someone accused of adultery at the time he said it), you have no right to condemn someone else for having committed a sin. The idea from a Christian standpoint is they're supposed to forgive him. If they hold it against him, then that's what would make them hypocrites.
So Trump is a Christian role model based on the he countless sins he commits & thus the best infinite opportunities they have to forgive him? Interesting perspective. Perhaps this is why so many so-called Christians are so accepting and supportive of pedophile priests, too.
What I said was in regard to a one time sexual encounter between consenting adults that took place a long time ago.
If Stormy Daniels who has had sex countless times on camera with countless people for money for countless people to lust over, became a christian, how should christians look upon her?
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
27 Mar 2018, 10:52 pm
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Now the hush money deal, that's an issue.
That's what we've been saying in the 20+ page thread about this. I don't care that he banged a porn star. What matters is the $130K in hush money that amounts to an illegal campaign contribution intended to influence the outcome of the US Presidential election in Trump's favour.
Actually it was pointed out people were going on way to much the "affair".
Those people probably have difficulty getting laid & are jealous that a fat old man has enough money to seduce a porn star.
I think there's an overall attempt throughout social media to influence Trump's evangelical supporters, so that's why many are harping on the "affair" part of it.
I think that angle is more pointing out the hypocrisy of religious people who are blindly following & supporting a sinful adulterer.
No it doesn't because Jesus said unless you never committed a sin (specifically referring to someone accused of adultery at the time he said it), you have no right to condemn someone else for having committed a sin. The idea from a Christian standpoint is they're supposed to forgive him. If they hold it against him, then that's what would make them hypocrites.
So Trump is a Christian role model based on the he countless sins he commits & thus the best infinite opportunities they have to forgive him? Interesting perspective. Perhaps this is why so many so-called Christians are so accepting and supportive of pedophile priests, too.
What I said was in regard to a one time sexual encounter between consenting adults that took place a long time ago.
If Stormy Daniels who has had sex countless times on camera with countless people for money for countless people to lust over, became a christian, how should christians look upon her?
Probably through indoctrinated eyes.
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
30 Mar 2018, 9:03 pm
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.30 Mar 2018, 9:17 pm
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
30 Mar 2018, 9:29 pm
EzraS wrote:
It seems obvious the whole thing is politically motivated.
Uh, they've been transparent about that from the beginning.
This is about illegal campaign contributions used to influence the outcome of the US Presidential election.
There's nothing more political than politics.. so, of course it's politically motivated.
What's your point?
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.30 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
goldfish21 wrote:
EzraS wrote:
It seems obvious the whole thing is politically motivated.
Uh, they've been transparent about that from the beginning.
This is about illegal campaign contributions used to influence the outcome of the US Presidential election.
There's nothing more political than politics.. so, of course it's politically motivated.
What's your point?
What about Michael Avenatti denying being political motivated?
How did you not hear that in the interview?
It's at 21:00 if you want to hear it again:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stormy-dan ... interview/
Last edited by EzraS on 30 Mar 2018, 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
goldfish21
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
30 Mar 2018, 10:09 pm
EzraS wrote:
How did you not hear that in the interview?
I haven't watched it, that's how.
_________________
No
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.30 Mar 2018, 10:20 pm
