New York Times hires openly racist Editorial Board member

Post Reply New Topic

Posting stuff like this would rightly get you banned from WrongPlanet, but at the New York Times, it gets you hired for a prestigious position:







http://thefederalist.com/2018/08/02/new ... nt-racist/

... and some claim that only white people can be racist...

I'm glad the Left is becoming so openly racist. They always have been, but historically, they've tried to at least give lip service to denying it. Now, they rarely bother, and if they do, it's a ridiculous claim like: "I am not white, therefore I cannot be racist, because racism is privilege-plus-power."

Ok so because one racist editorial board member was hired by New York times the left is collectively racist. I guess that means everyone on the right is a racist to since there are openly racist right wingers, white supremacists and neo-nazis are usually right wingers. So, that's it I guess every right winger is a Nazi.

You see....blanket generalizations can go both ways.

Also I don't see how anyone would be glad about any increase of racist behavior, regardless of what political leanings of people committing said behavior, its disgusting either way.

Darmok appears to be attacking the notion that "racism against whites doesn't exist".

Blame it on Trump.

Job market is tight now.

LOL. Because of Trump, even the NYT has to scrape the bottom of the employment barrel.

lol

that makes you glad....why?

I definitely don't think all those on the left are racist just as I don't think all on the right are racist.

The OP has cited an example of "Reverse racism" that is very sadly accepted in our culture today and among a number of leftists encouraged as a virtue signal. It's very sad that ANY racism is accepted in our culture today including............"reverse racism". Racism is racism, period. One kind of racism is not "OK" while another kind is to be condemned. It's pitiable.

Leftist policies like affirmative action are inherently racist, as is the very concept of "identity politics." And it is a Leftist bromide, particularly in academia, to claim that "racism is prejudice plus power," making it impossible for minorities to be racist--which is, itself, racist. This is by no means just "one journalist"--it's a running theme throughout the entire doctrine.

And national socialism is a Leftist (i.e., collectivist) ideology. Note that if you take the racism out of Richard Spencer's political advocacy, you're essentially left with vanilla socialism. National socialists even embrace the Marxist concept of polylogism--they simply differentiate between "race" as opposed to "class" in terms of what separates groups of people. (Note that race-based polylogism is also at the heart of identity politics.)


As I stated, the Left has historically been quite viciously racist in the ideas and policies they've advocated--they've simply tried to deny or evade this fact when it's pointed out. They're increasingly likely to be open about it now. It is always better when people become more open and honest about what they're advocating.

I'm guessing that Sarah Jeong is secretly turned on by white guys. She talks about how much she hates us, but she is secretly aroused by our hairy chests and huge noses.

The best thing that we can do is make fun of Sarah Jeong. Let's keep and eye on her just to see what sort of crap she will spew next.

If we express serious concerns about her racism, people will likely just call us whiners. Making fun of her is a better strategy. In find that the best way to deal with misandry and anti-white racism is to make fun of it.

This is going to become much worse and whites become a minority.

A Christmas Eve thought.

If I were a racist, I would say something like "I imagine that a weird dog smell would make you hungry."

Whoops! I just said it!

Some more about her and the company standing behind her:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45052534

She has the SJW hair too.

Now then, if she could marry someone with a surname beginning with W, and double barrel it on to the end of her name, her initials would be SJW.

Hypothetical: would she have gotten hired by the New York Times if she had said things like this: