Could the "sexual revolution" ever be un-done?

Post Reply New Topic

uhm a society must have traditional rolemodels and within that tolorance is desirable

the hippies formed 'communes' that turned out to be total failures

then the punk- squatters didn't even have any community at all, weirdo's could roam and no one protects no one

take a look at the old pedestal (no pun intended till here) of 'enlightening examples'




^ this as example of how things work

don't know on schlomo fraud yet but that'll come

track back on that last century must be done

more trouble coming still "How is This a Thing? 19th of November 2018"

its old as predators that dress up as saints (meta-pedo-physics)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine ... iginal_sin"

For hundreds of years neither sex not marriage were endorsed by the western chuch.
St Augustine had said that the only sex that was not a passage to Hell was the carnal union of two Saved Souls for the sole purpose of creating another soul to be saved. Thus most marriages were considered to be at least potentially sinful (unlike sacred marriages between holy men), and it was not until the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 that the Church declared marriage to be a sacrament - with a prescribed ritual - and ensured it's eventual demise by espousing the 'family values' so despised by Jesus and the first Christians.
It is no coincidence that this came very shortly after the new cult of the Virgin Mary replaced the respect accorded to Mary Magdalene and Lazarus the Leper in the previous hundred years. " (-beyond the pale)

Well, some things are better today than they were before but in other ways society declined a lot. The cost of things like living have gone up very much compared to wages. Even NT's struggle harder today financially and functionally than in previous generations.