Another 'Russiagate' hoax debunked.

Post Reply New Topic

Oh! Can I play this game too? Here's my translation of your words:


"I'm not going to watch RT, bro, and decide for myself whether the content has any merit or not. The corporate media has convinced me that it's evil propaganda. I listen to the MSM. I'm a good little American, who bows to the will of my corporate masters!"

Why won't you forgive him? If you like his stories, then what does it matter what network he works for? What's really sad that journalists and commentators who are really putting their asses on the line to tell the truth about our corrupt system have to go outside the MSM to have a platform; then they get demonized and marginalized.


Typing this will get be branded as a conspiracy theorist, simply because that's the way they've been conditioned. But there's no real conspiracy involved, here -- not a formal one, anyway. It's just the way things work in an oligarchy. Connect the dots, follow the money, see where interests converge, and you get the whole picture.

Serving an evil master. I'm not against criticism, but bias can exist not just in individual stories, but in what stories you choose to cover.

Exactly! The many stories are often ignored on MSM, or are spun in a way to deflect attention away from the true motives and the players involved.


As long as humans are driven by power and greed, this is the world we're going to face. Those with the power and money will continue to exert force to get more for themselves, and less for everyone else. They will not be concerned with the long-term consequences, and they will utilize every resource at their disposal to manipulate the people. An informed populace is not in their best interests -- and they control the information we receive.

Every bit of media has bias, whether it's paid or not. Doesn't mean that they're posting propaganda.

And I'd like to point at the difference between having biases and flat out lying, like has become acceptable practice on Sinclair media outlets

I'd rather deal with the bias from MSNBC than that of RT. On the whole, I think competition is more at play between news outlets than some sinister coordination.

The difference between MSNBC and RT is the latter is exposing the game they are playing. I see MSNBC and FOX as flips sides of the coin. They each serve a different party, but they are both dedicated to perpetuating the political divide. The differences between the two major parties is largely manufactured, at this point. Both are controlled by pretty much the same corporate interests.

Good. I like partisanship. And I think I can weed out corporate influence.

At least your honest, I'll give you that. I despise partisanship with every fiber of my being. It's what maintains a broken, corrupt system. Buona fortuna!

I'm not ready to make nice. I'm ready to fight and not give an inch. And we will win, we have the numbers. The only bi-partisanship I can accept is between the Democratic Socialists and the Democrats.

IMO the Russia thing is whether it's about people making money Or destroying the USA in favour of Russia.

But I don't think its an either or thing. I think it's both. And trump might not even be aware of it. He's probably just trying to make as much money for himself and his friends as he can, and for his Russian financiers who own him, while Putin's ultimate aim isn't about money at all - its about power and control - and he's using trump's easily exploited greed to get him to do the things he needs done to destabilize the USA so he can watch it fall & then pick up the pieces as he asserts more power around the world.

That's my thoughts of the moment on it.

The corporate Dems will shut down any true progressives in the party -- there will be no bi-partisanship between them. If you've been following the Tulsa Gabbard story, you'd realize this. She's been smeared for her stance against the Venezuela coop and her anti-war stance. Sorry, but you are part of the problem, not the solution if you are actively keeping the partisan divide alive.

Where did I mention Alex Jones? Only you did. He's a conman who spreads disinformation for money and to save his own skin.

Anyone pushing the Russiagate hoax, please see my original post to see your thoughts debunked.

Yeah, except for the part where nothing is debunked. Just some guy talking on YouTube saying he doesn’t believe there’s anything nefarious about this administration’s dealings with Russia, and he rest of the world giving a little side-eye thinking “Uh, wtf? These guys are WAY too cozy with Russia for their not to be something amiss.”

The Russia Investigation is not itself a hoax.