The rapid decline of the natural world

Page 4 of 4 [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

traven
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Sep 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,250

21 Mar 2019, 2:15 am

the ever returning zombie-lies

the cc agenda doesn't adress polution at all
in fact it stands for standardizing corporate (religiously taxfree) fixes

think about the shareholders



Crimadella
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2019
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,644
Location: Warner Robins, Ga

21 Mar 2019, 10:43 am

cyberdad wrote:
Crimadella wrote:
Never-mind the fact that humans are a part of nature, therefor we are natural. .


Humans are classified as viruses. Actually we are literally a virus
https://www.livescience.com/61627-ancie ... brain.html

Our human consciousness was apparently activated by this embedded virus which causes us to behave like viruses procreating and spreading at the expense of all living things on earth

The current convention in science is that humans have interrupted the equilibrium of life on this planet in the same way a virus infects a host (the earth being a host in this context).
https://futurism.media/are-humans-a-virus-on-the-planet

We are meta-pathogens

NASA plan to build self-replicating robots that will perpetually spread throughout the universe. I guess even the most enlightened minds want to create replicants of ourselves


Humans are animals, and viruses are a part of nature. Sure, we can be compared to a virus, any animal that would have a negative impact could be compared to a virus, but people are not viruses, animals are not viruses...

Virus : an infective agent that typically consists of a nucleic acid molecule in a protein coat, is too small to be seen by light microscopy, and is able to multiply only within the living cells of a host.

An ant can be controlled by a virus, that is not suggesting that the ant itself is a virus.

Edit: As a correction, a virus isn't required to have a negative impact on it's host, which kinda makes the argument of "humans are like a virus for planet earth" kinda pointless(IMO). It's like, compared to the universe, a planet is a single cell organism. (???)



Last edited by Crimadella on 21 Mar 2019, 2:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.

SportsGamer35728
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 6 Oct 2015
Posts: 349
Location: Vice City

21 Mar 2019, 1:49 pm

cyberdad wrote:
Crimadella wrote:
Never-mind the fact that humans are a part of nature, therefor we are natural. .


Humans are classified as viruses. Actually we are literally a virus
https://www.livescience.com/61627-ancie ... brain.html

Our human consciousness was apparently activated by this embedded virus which causes us to behave like viruses procreating and spreading at the expense of all living things on earth

The current convention in science is that humans have interrupted the equilibrium of life on this planet in the same way a virus infects a host (the earth being a host in this context).
https://futurism.media/are-humans-a-virus-on-the-planet

We are meta-pathogens

NASA plan to build self-replicating robots that will perpetually spread throughout the universe. I guess even the most enlightened minds want to create replicants of ourselves

You're not the only one who thinks like this...
https://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/e-se ... umcan.html



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,195

22 Mar 2019, 4:40 am

Crimadella wrote:
Humans are animals, and viruses are a part of nature. Sure, we can be compared to a virus, any animal that would have a negative impact could be compared to a virus, but people are not viruses, animals are not viruses...

Virus : an infective agent that typically consists of a nucleic acid molecule in a protein coat, is too small to be seen by light microscopy, and is able to multiply only within the living cells of a host.

An ant can be controlled by a virus, that is not suggesting that the ant itself is a virus.

Edit: As a correction, a virus isn't required to have a negative impact on it's host, which kinda makes the argument of "humans are like a virus for planet earth" kinda pointless(IMO). It's like, compared to the universe, a planet is a single cell organism. (???)


Actually I agree with you that we are comparable to viruses, it's just scientists like to classify stuff...



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,195

22 Mar 2019, 4:41 am

SportsGamer35728 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Crimadella wrote:
Never-mind the fact that humans are a part of nature, therefor we are natural. .


Humans are classified as viruses. Actually we are literally a virus
https://www.livescience.com/61627-ancie ... brain.html

Our human consciousness was apparently activated by this embedded virus which causes us to behave like viruses procreating and spreading at the expense of all living things on earth

The current convention in science is that humans have interrupted the equilibrium of life on this planet in the same way a virus infects a host (the earth being a host in this context).
https://futurism.media/are-humans-a-virus-on-the-planet

We are meta-pathogens

NASA plan to build self-replicating robots that will perpetually spread throughout the universe. I guess even the most enlightened minds want to create replicants of ourselves

You're not the only one who thinks like this...
https://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/e-se ... umcan.html

LOL! now I'm in great company :lol:



cron