Peter Ridd's Fight for Freedom of Speech on Climate Change

Page 2 of 2 [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,845
Location: Oz

29 Mar 2019, 7:43 pm

shlaifu wrote:
Pepe wrote:
shlaifu wrote:
In a quick google search, I can't even find anyone debating the state of the reef - but a lot of sources usually held in high esteem, like nature magazine, describing rather drastic and widespread coral bleaching.
Freedom of speech aside... Is he right?

And does the visual impression actually do justice to the damage done? Meaning: did the scientists pick their picture because it looked particularly impressive even to laypeople, while the rest of the area was in ill shape, but the shape would have been hard to assess by laypeople (and possibly Mr. Ridd?)


Ridd has been investigating environmental consideration for over 40 years...
It is a passion for him...
I don't have any PHDs, yet I am a god damn genius in many areas... :mrgreen:

Before we skid off the topic, I suggest we don't... :mrgreen:

It is *factual* that the photos presented were fakes...
I.E. Fake news... :mrgreen:
End of story... :wink:


If I got thst correctly, they were a point sample made to appear as representative of the whole - but not fake.
They were incorrectly used to illustrate something they didn't represent (i.e., the whole of the area).
That's a misleading use, but it doesn't mean the image is fake.
And it doesn't mean the news is fake, either.
It just means that the image doesn't support the news.


The photos were fake in that they were misleading...
End of story...<sigh> :wink:


_________________
Down with big business!...
I'm not here to change the world...There isn't a big enough soiled nappy bin... ;)
Autistic/scout motto: "Give me a better argument and I will listen..."
"Hate me for who I am...Not for who you think I am..."
"Honesty is not a social duty, not a sacrifice for the sake of others, but the most profoundly selfish virtue man can practice: his refusal to sacrifice the reality of his own existence to the deluded consciousness of others."
Truth may be inconvenient but it is never politically incorrect...The Oracle of Truth has spoken...8) I'm a rationalist...Deal with it...:mrgreen:


shlaifu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 May 2014
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,139

30 Mar 2019, 1:33 pm

yeah.... if that's the resolution of analysis you want to keep this at.
personally, I prefer to distinguish between kinds of treacherousness going on, so I can figure out what's going on.


_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,845
Location: Oz

31 Mar 2019, 10:09 pm


https://youtu.be/VykCpM7LjNM


_________________
Down with big business!...
I'm not here to change the world...There isn't a big enough soiled nappy bin... ;)
Autistic/scout motto: "Give me a better argument and I will listen..."
"Hate me for who I am...Not for who you think I am..."
"Honesty is not a social duty, not a sacrifice for the sake of others, but the most profoundly selfish virtue man can practice: his refusal to sacrifice the reality of his own existence to the deluded consciousness of others."
Truth may be inconvenient but it is never politically incorrect...The Oracle of Truth has spoken...8) I'm a rationalist...Deal with it...:mrgreen:


shlaifu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 May 2014
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,139

02 Apr 2019, 5:51 pm

Yea. I read some other sources on this.
The climate-connection to coral bleaching is still the most "trusted" science.
The use of misleading images was wrong.
The guy shouldn't get fired over his whistleblowing, I agree that's wrong, too.

.... "The age of computers has made it so where no one knows what's going on anymore" -D. Trump

Can't tell who's legit here. The courts must figure that one out.
But you're right, the university is doing an awful job.


_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,845
Location: Oz

02 Apr 2019, 6:00 pm

shlaifu wrote:
The guy shouldn't get fired over his whistleblowing, I agree that's wrong, too.

.... "The age of computers has made it so where no one knows what's going on anymore" -D. Trump

Can't tell who's legit here. The courts must figure that one out.
But you're right, the university is doing an awful job.


Yep...


_________________
Down with big business!...
I'm not here to change the world...There isn't a big enough soiled nappy bin... ;)
Autistic/scout motto: "Give me a better argument and I will listen..."
"Hate me for who I am...Not for who you think I am..."
"Honesty is not a social duty, not a sacrifice for the sake of others, but the most profoundly selfish virtue man can practice: his refusal to sacrifice the reality of his own existence to the deluded consciousness of others."
Truth may be inconvenient but it is never politically incorrect...The Oracle of Truth has spoken...8) I'm a rationalist...Deal with it...:mrgreen:


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,845
Location: Oz

16 Apr 2019, 4:37 am

Viva la freedom of speech!
Viva la freedom of thought!
Metaphorical death to perverters of truth!


Quote:
Peter Ridd Wins Biggest Victory On Free Speech In A Generation
Gideon Rozner 16 April 2019 , IPA TODAY, PUBLICATIONS, Media Releases, RESEARCH AREAS, Climate Change, Freedom of Speech
Share:Print this pageEmail to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on Pinterest
The Institute of Public Affairs has today welcomed the historic judgement in the case of Peter Ridd vs James Cook University (JCU) with Judge Vasta finding that Peter Ridd was wrongly dismissed by JCU.

“This judgement should rightly send shockwaves through Australian universities regarding their commitment to academic freedom and how they deal with academics who hold a contrary view to established group think,” said Gideon Rozner, Director of Policy at the free market think tank, the Institute of Public Affairs.

Dr Peter Ridd, a professor of physics at JCU, was sacked by the university for misconduct for questioning in the IPA’s publication Climate Change: The Facts 2017 the climate change science around the Great Barrier Reef and for public statements made on the Jones & Co Sky News program.

“Many academics are censured, but few are prepared to speak out and risk their career, faced with the prospect of legal battles and possible bankruptcy,” said Mr Rozner.

“Peter Ridd was only able to challenge James Cook University’s decision because of the IPA’s work to ensure he had the financial, legal and moral support of thousands of Australians to pursue his fight for freedom of speech on climate change.”

“Today’s decision is a huge win for academic freedom and for freedom of speech in Australia. This is something the IPA has been fighting for, for years, and we will continue to do so.”

“The case has identified a culture of censorship when it comes to challenging claims surrounding climate change and the Great Barrier Reef. Not once did JCU attempt to disprove claims made by Dr Ridd about the Great Barrier Reef.”

“Fearmongering about the health of the Great Barrier Reef must now desist.”

“JCU has shredded the idea that Australian universities have any sort of commitment to scientific integrity and free academic inquiry. JCU’s actions prove the depth of the free speech crisis confronting Australia’s universities.”

“Australian Universities must now commit to signing up to the model code as recommended by the Hon. Robert French AC in his review of freedom of speech at Australian Universities,” said Mr Rozner. https://ipa.org.au/publications-ipa/pet ... generation


_________________
Down with big business!...
I'm not here to change the world...There isn't a big enough soiled nappy bin... ;)
Autistic/scout motto: "Give me a better argument and I will listen..."
"Hate me for who I am...Not for who you think I am..."
"Honesty is not a social duty, not a sacrifice for the sake of others, but the most profoundly selfish virtue man can practice: his refusal to sacrifice the reality of his own existence to the deluded consciousness of others."
Truth may be inconvenient but it is never politically incorrect...The Oracle of Truth has spoken...8) I'm a rationalist...Deal with it...:mrgreen:


jimmy m
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2018
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,520
Location: Indiana

16 Apr 2019, 7:49 am

The Federal Courts in Australia sided with Peter Ridd.

Peter Ridd was a professor at James Cook University who dared to question claims that the Great Barrier Reef is facing imminent catastrophe from climate change. Eventually he was sacked for not backing down.

But with public support support he insisted that the university undertake some quality assurance of its research, and refused to be censored, for continuing to speak out.

His battle to speak for science against the Climate Inquisition reached the courts, with a three-day hearing in the Federal Court in Brisbane just last month.

The Court ordered:

* The 17 findings made by the University, the two speech directions, the five confidentiality directions, the no satire direction, the censure and the final censure given by the University and the termination of employment of Professor Ridd by the University were all unlawful.

* The issue of the making of declarations and penalty are adjourned to a date to be fixed.

It is very significant that Peter has won on the issue of academic freedom: that he did have a right to ignore the university administrators and continuing to speak out about the lack of quality assurance and also against the disciplinary process he was being unfairly subjected to.

This is important news for freedom of speech and thought and professional conscience everywhere.

James Cook University may have already spent over $1 million in legal fees attempting to silence Peter.


Source: Peter Ridd has defeated the Climate Inquisition thanks to you



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,845
Location: Oz

16 Apr 2019, 2:05 pm

jimmy m wrote:
The Federal Courts in Australia sided with Peter Ridd.

Peter Ridd was a professor at James Cook University who dared to question claims that the Great Barrier Reef is facing imminent catastrophe from climate change. Eventually he was sacked for not backing down.

But with public support support he insisted that the university undertake some quality assurance of its research, and refused to be censored, for continuing to speak out.

His battle to speak for science against the Climate Inquisition reached the courts, with a three-day hearing in the Federal Court in Brisbane just last month.

The Court ordered:

* The 17 findings made by the University, the two speech directions, the five confidentiality directions, the no satire direction, the censure and the final censure given by the University and the termination of employment of Professor Ridd by the University were all unlawful.

* The issue of the making of declarations and penalty are adjourned to a date to be fixed.

It is very significant that Peter has won on the issue of academic freedom: that he did have a right to ignore the university administrators and continuing to speak out about the lack of quality assurance and also against the disciplinary process he was being unfairly subjected to.

This is important news for freedom of speech and thought and professional conscience everywhere.

James Cook University may have already spent over $1 million in legal fees attempting to silence Peter.


Source: Peter Ridd has defeated the Climate Inquisition thanks to you


HOOWAH!

To all the lemmings out there with their heads firmly planted up their arses:
Don't be intimidated by corrupt authority figures!
Don't embrace groupthink!
f*****g think for yourselves!
Vive la révolution!


_________________
Down with big business!...
I'm not here to change the world...There isn't a big enough soiled nappy bin... ;)
Autistic/scout motto: "Give me a better argument and I will listen..."
"Hate me for who I am...Not for who you think I am..."
"Honesty is not a social duty, not a sacrifice for the sake of others, but the most profoundly selfish virtue man can practice: his refusal to sacrifice the reality of his own existence to the deluded consciousness of others."
Truth may be inconvenient but it is never politically incorrect...The Oracle of Truth has spoken...8) I'm a rationalist...Deal with it...:mrgreen:


jimmy m
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2018
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,520
Location: Indiana

17 Apr 2019, 12:04 pm

When global warming campaigners misled people about the status of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, Dr. Peter Ridd of James Cook University spoke up.

He engaged in such over-the-top conduct as sharing pictures of areas of the reef that had been deemed dead, but were in fact experiencing "spectacular coral growth," and postulating that the coral had died and regrown following natural cyclones in ways it has for ages past.

Temporary coral bleaching, not an indictment of human civilization and its CO2 emissions? Heresy!

What was Dr. Ridd's reward for raising important scientific questions and attempting to correct the record about the reef?

He was censured, censored, and sacked.

Think of the chilling impact the university's effort to destroy a scientist's career for speaking out had, not only on Dr. Ridd, but on all researchers at James Cook or any place of learning. The message was clear: "Shut up, toe the party line, or out you go." How many researchers labor in silence, escape to other work, or mouth what their intellect tells them is rank PC dogma from fear of being treated like Peter Ridd?

If unvetted academic groupthink is what you want, this is how you get it.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,845
Location: Oz

Yesterday, 2:46 am

jimmy m wrote:
When global warming campaigners misled people about the status of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, Dr. Peter Ridd of James Cook University spoke up.

He engaged in such over-the-top conduct as sharing pictures of areas of the reef that had been deemed dead, but were in fact experiencing "spectacular coral growth," and postulating that the coral had died and regrown following natural cyclones in ways it has for ages past.

Temporary coral bleaching, not an indictment of human civilization and its CO2 emissions? Heresy!

What was Dr. Ridd's reward for raising important scientific questions and attempting to correct the record about the reef?

He was censured, censored, and sacked.

Think of the chilling impact the university's effort to destroy a scientist's career for speaking out had, not only on Dr. Ridd, but on all researchers at James Cook or any place of learning. The message was clear: "Shut up, toe the party line, or out you go." How many researchers labor in silence, escape to other work, or mouth what their intellect tells them is rank PC dogma from fear of being treated like Peter Ridd?

If unvetted academic groupthink is what you want, this is how you get it.


HOOWAH!


_________________
Down with big business!...
I'm not here to change the world...There isn't a big enough soiled nappy bin... ;)
Autistic/scout motto: "Give me a better argument and I will listen..."
"Hate me for who I am...Not for who you think I am..."
"Honesty is not a social duty, not a sacrifice for the sake of others, but the most profoundly selfish virtue man can practice: his refusal to sacrifice the reality of his own existence to the deluded consciousness of others."
Truth may be inconvenient but it is never politically incorrect...The Oracle of Truth has spoken...8) I'm a rationalist...Deal with it...:mrgreen: