Presidential election 2020 USA
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,461
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
its too corrupted, out of touch, delusional to succeed in the future. the entire structure of the country has been distorted to an utterly grotesque shape that no man however talented could resolve.
I think what fuels liberals and neoliberals delusions is that as long as it triumphs over conservatives ( one day .. nobody knows when .. does anyone expect biden could change anything .. ) it doesn't matter how rampant their own corruption or nepotism is .. what its prolongated own corruption and nepotism does is nothing but insidious harm to the general health of its own society as shown as during the past mere short period of time that was 30 years a society seemingly completely lost in the course of history .
I for one don't care about triumphing over the conservatives, I recognize there are liberals more focused on that than anything else but they don't represent us all. I care about the planet that is my motivation and it seems even with all the flaws and corruption of the democratic party....of the two parties, they'd be more likely to take action on it and design policies with the environment in mind even if it is more to do with social pressure than out of the goodness of their own heart. It is a matter of having to pick the lesser evil.
It would be nice if any kind of third party had any chance whatsoever, but in the current election process they never do..I've already tried the 3rd party route and I have little faith in that currently.
Also we should be using tech on the border, not a medieval wall that will destroy the ecosystems along the border. As it stands the wall could put the Rio Grande river at risk by causing blockage. I suspect that could increase the flood risk of land upstream of the border whilst potentially drying it out downstream. Granted its possible lawsuits will stop the wall through some key habitat areas and the river, but it has yet to be seen.
_________________
We won't go back.
Mainly my approach for years to elections is the old saying, "fall in love in the Primary election, fall in line for the General election."
I'd mostly agree accept I find Biden extremely sketchy and would feel highly conflicted with him.
Currently, I'm liking Yang.
_________________
Diagnosed autistic level 2, ODD, anxiety, dyspraxic, essential tremors, depression (Doubted), CAPD, hyper mobility syndrome
Suspected; PTSD (Treated, as my counselor did notice), possible PCOS, PMDD, Learning disabilities (Sure of it, unknown what they are), possibly something wrong with immune system (Sick about as much as I'm not) Possible EDS- hyper mobility type (Will be getting tested, suggested by doctor) dysautonomia
its too corrupted, out of touch, delusional to succeed in the future. the entire structure of the country has been distorted to an utterly grotesque shape that no man however talented could resolve.
I think what fuels liberals and neoliberals delusions is that as long as it triumphs over conservatives ( one day .. nobody knows when .. does anyone expect biden could change anything .. ) it doesn't matter how rampant their own corruption or nepotism is .. what its prolongated own corruption and nepotism does is nothing but insidious harm to the general health of its own society as shown as during the past mere short period of time that was 30 years a society seemingly completely lost in the course of history .
I for one don't care about triumphing over the conservatives, I recognize there are liberals more focused on that than anything else but they don't represent us all. I care about the planet that is my motivation and it seems even with all the flaws and corruption of the democratic party....of the two parties, they'd be more likely to take action on it and design policies with the environment in mind even if it is more to do with social pressure than out of the goodness of their own heart. It is a matter of having to pick the lesser evil.
It would be nice if any kind of third party had any chance whatsoever, but in the current election process they never do..I've already tried the 3rd party route and I have little faith in that currently.
Also we should be using tech on the border, not a medieval wall that will destroy the ecosystems along the border. As it stands the wall could put the Rio Grande river at risk by causing blockage. I suspect that could increase the flood risk of land upstream of the border whilst potentially drying it out downstream. Granted its possible lawsuits will stop the wall through some key habitat areas and the river, but it has yet to be seen.
I'd go third party but this time around seems limited on options
_________________
Diagnosed autistic level 2, ODD, anxiety, dyspraxic, essential tremors, depression (Doubted), CAPD, hyper mobility syndrome
Suspected; PTSD (Treated, as my counselor did notice), possible PCOS, PMDD, Learning disabilities (Sure of it, unknown what they are), possibly something wrong with immune system (Sick about as much as I'm not) Possible EDS- hyper mobility type (Will be getting tested, suggested by doctor) dysautonomia
Voting third party in a presidential election is effectively throwing your vote away. I agree that more than two viable parties is greatly needed but the way to build one is by committing to state & local elections to essentially build a caucus that will eventually make federal third party candidates viable on a national level. However, the political system status quo in the USA makes a third party extremely hard to grow over time, especially if nascent third parties just run a handful of candidates in primarily federal elections only. IMO.
_________________
"Who in the world am I?” Ah, that’s the great puzzle.”
Alice in Wonderland
AQ score: 36
Diagnosed May 2021: ASD Level 1, requiring support; and also Unspecified Anxiety Disorder
Actually, I think voting for corporate politicians from either party is throwing our votes away, since it only maintains a broken system ruled by corporatists. We have been bamboozled into believing that there is a difference between Dems and Pubs, when that hasn't been the case for well over 30 years.
The narrative you're pushing is being driven by the corporatists. "Hey, don't bother voting for third-party and independents, they can't win! Ya gotta pick one of the two major candidates selected for you, via a rigged primary process!"
I guess we're f****d either way, eh?
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
True, both major parties are beholden to varying degrees to corporate interests. However, that's the system we currently have and voting for third party Presidential candidates does nothing to change it. And there is clearly a difference in policy positions and focus for the two major parties - saying there is no difference is simply promoting a false equivalency.
I'm not saying to not vote for third party candidates - I'm saying build a third party at the state & local levels if you're really serious about creating one. Simply casting a vote every four years for a spoiler Presidential candidate does nothing to challenge the status quo, other than making some voters think that's what they're doing. Down-ticket offices are key to building party support, as Republicans have clearly accepted for a while and Democrats only sometimes remember.
_________________
"Who in the world am I?” Ah, that’s the great puzzle.”
Alice in Wonderland
AQ score: 36
Diagnosed May 2021: ASD Level 1, requiring support; and also Unspecified Anxiety Disorder
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,784
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
So far, I like Pete Buttigeige, as he's by far the most provably intelligent candidate out there, and as a minority (gay) he understands the need for empathy when it comes to others who have been been given the short end of the stick. Otherwise, I like Kamala Harris. I'd even vote for Biden as long as it's anyone but Trump.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Actually, I think voting for corporate politicians from either party is throwing our votes away, since it only maintains a broken system ruled by corporatists. We have been bamboozled into believing that there is a difference between Dems and Pubs, when that hasn't been the case for well over 30 years.
The narrative you're pushing is being driven by the corporatists. "Hey, don't bother voting for third-party and independents, they can't win! Ya gotta pick one of the two major candidates selected for you, via a rigged primary process!"
I guess we're f****d either way, eh?
The bolded section is obviously and demonstrably false. There are few countries in the West with as radical a divide between the two biggest parties as the USA. In the 70s the system was much less polarised, but these days there are very few moderate Republicans and very few conservative Democrats (at least, in power).
I would suggest you are either unfamiliar with American politics, or perhaps you place an unusually large amount of weight on one of the issues that they do agree on to the extent that you ignore the huge and meaningful differences between the two parties. Your life and your country would be much better if a few hundred people in Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida had voted for Hillary Clinton.
I would, however, agree with you that voting outside of these two parties is rarely a waste. Indeed, if you live in a safe state like Illinois then you should vote with your conscience. But in a marginal state like New Mexico, you should choose between the two candidates running for the big parties.
Voting is a meaningless, f*****g exercise if we don't have anyone worth voting for. I voted for Jill Stein in the last election with the hopes of pushing her to 5%, which would give the Green Party more leverage cycle. There's no way I'd vote for any other candidate in the Dem field besides Tulsi Gabbard. Corporate media shills like Maddow will always try to shame third-party voters, but they can shove that s**t straight up their elite asses. I no longer respond to their propaganda.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
ThePerfectionist
Tufted Titmouse
Joined: 10 May 2019
Age: 23
Posts: 31
Location: Deep within the depths of my vast mind
Jill was an open antivaxxer
_________________
Diagnosed autistic level 2, ODD, anxiety, dyspraxic, essential tremors, depression (Doubted), CAPD, hyper mobility syndrome
Suspected; PTSD (Treated, as my counselor did notice), possible PCOS, PMDD, Learning disabilities (Sure of it, unknown what they are), possibly something wrong with immune system (Sick about as much as I'm not) Possible EDS- hyper mobility type (Will be getting tested, suggested by doctor) dysautonomia
Actually, I think voting for corporate politicians from either party is throwing our votes away, since it only maintains a broken system ruled by corporatists. We have been bamboozled into believing that there is a difference between Dems and Pubs, when that hasn't been the case for well over 30 years.
The narrative you're pushing is being driven by the corporatists. "Hey, don't bother voting for third-party and independents, they can't win! Ya gotta pick one of the two major candidates selected for you, via a rigged primary process!"
I guess we're f****d either way, eh?
The bolded section is obviously and demonstrably false. There are few countries in the West with as radical a divide between the two biggest parties as the USA. In the 70s the system was much less polarised, but these days there are very few moderate Republicans and very few conservative Democrats (at least, in power).
I would suggest you are either unfamiliar with American politics, or perhaps you place an unusually large amount of weight on one of the issues that they do agree on to the extent that you ignore the huge and meaningful differences between the two parties. Your life and your country would be much better if a few hundred people in Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida had voted for Hillary Clinton.
I would, however, agree with you that voting outside of these two parties is rarely a waste. Indeed, if you live in a safe state like Illinois then you should vote with your conscience. But in a marginal state like New Mexico, you should choose between the two candidates running for the big parties.
Actually New Mexico is a solid blue state.
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
Now proficient in ChatGPT!
Jill was an open antivaxxer
She had some issues with vaccines, but she wasn't an anti-vaxxer.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/is-gr ... i-vaccine/
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
Actually, I think voting for corporate politicians from either party is throwing our votes away, since it only maintains a broken system ruled by corporatists. We have been bamboozled into believing that there is a difference between Dems and Pubs, when that hasn't been the case for well over 30 years.
The narrative you're pushing is being driven by the corporatists. "Hey, don't bother voting for third-party and independents, they can't win! Ya gotta pick one of the two major candidates selected for you, via a rigged primary process!"
I guess we're f****d either way, eh?
The bolded section is obviously and demonstrably false. There are few countries in the West with as radical a divide between the two biggest parties as the USA. In the 70s the system was much less polarised, but these days there are very few moderate Republicans and very few conservative Democrats (at least, in power).
I would suggest you are either unfamiliar with American politics, or perhaps you place an unusually large amount of weight on one of the issues that they do agree on to the extent that you ignore the huge and meaningful differences between the two parties. Your life and your country would be much better if a few hundred people in Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida had voted for Hillary Clinton.
I would, however, agree with you that voting outside of these two parties is rarely a waste. Indeed, if you live in a safe state like Illinois then you should vote with your conscience. But in a marginal state like New Mexico, you should choose between the two candidates running for the big parties.
Oh, that's rich! Somebody from another country telling me I'm unfamiliar with American politics. I can back up my claim all day long, and have been doing so for a very long time. I actually paid attention during the Obama years and realized he was every bit as horrible as his predecessor Bush. The Dems are actually more dangerous than the Pubs, because they try to make people believe they're progressives, then get in office and f**k over the people with as much vigor as the Pubs. You don't have any idea what you're talking about. It's best not to make an assertion if you haven't done any research.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Russia’s 2024 election interference has already begun |
26 Feb 2024, 6:22 pm |
Kyrsten Sinema Won't Seek Re-Election to the US Senate |
05 Mar 2024, 8:45 pm |
White nationalist wins Oklahoma council election |
19 Mar 2024, 3:45 pm |
Judge tosses out Trump's Georgia election interference case |
13 Mar 2024, 11:48 am |