03 Jul 2019, 7:22 pm
Prometheus18 wrote:
Mountain Goat wrote:
I am not too fussy, but I think I prefer a more traditional young lady. A lady which does not follow the latest fasions but finds what she likes and enjoys it,
[...]
And I have to say that I look at beauty in a very different way to the common man. I see a ladies character as her beauty.
[...]
And I have to say that I look at beauty in a very different way to the common man. I see a ladies character as her beauty.
Thanks Mr P.
I don't really want to put my preferences as conditions, but I do look more to beautiful character in a lady then looks. Looks can be good, but not essential. As what use are great looks without character?
03 Jul 2019, 7:25 pm
Mountain Goat wrote:
Prometheus18 wrote:
Mountain Goat wrote:
I am not too fussy, but I think I prefer a more traditional young lady. A lady which does not follow the latest fasions but finds what she likes and enjoys it,
[...]
And I have to say that I look at beauty in a very different way to the common man. I see a ladies character as her beauty.
[...]
And I have to say that I look at beauty in a very different way to the common man. I see a ladies character as her beauty.
Thanks Mr P.
I don't really want to put my preferences as conditions, but I do look more to beautiful character in a lady then looks. Looks can be good, but not essential. As what use are great looks without character?
The way I see it is that it's impossible for someone's face to be attractive if it's not as it were illuminated by a good soul. I'm a firm believer in physiognomy.
03 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
