'Drag Kid' Photographed With Naked Adult

Post Reply New Topic

My aunt's second husband got a five year stint in the clink for having pictures of naked little girls on his computer. One of my former bosses got seven years in military prison for downloading porn featuring underage girls.

No one is going to tell me that child sexual abuse is a "gay" thing. As for the "drag kid" in the article, this is actually old news and many gay community leaders and drag queens spoke out against it.

Actually, I've just recently discovered the issue at the pride parade. I tend to talk about things which are current news, you know, by watching news?? In fact, there have been many cases where cases of pedophilia were popular which I have obsessed on which involved hstraight people, it just hasn't been current news broadcasts lately. Often people seem to dismiss those casses, they don't tend to go mainstream. I would like someone to quote where I said 'all pride parades are like this". People tend to feel any article they don't agree with is silly, the background of the writter tends to not matter. Many things are going on concerning pedophillia, when the people I watch, political commentators, bring them up I tend to discuss them. I would say that is common among most people who discuss current events, they discuss news they have currently read or seen. I've talked about the pride parade thing in only two threads just recently, why? Because it was recent news, or I recently learned about the incident. I talk about the trans kid issue for much longer because I have dug into it and watched and read a lot of information. I could say a lot about that issue because I have obtained a lot of information about the subject and it continues to push forward with false studies carried out by activists, not doctors nor professionals. Anyway, I'm done with this conversation, I'm getting tired of all the false accusations. If people don't care about these things and would rather assume that things activists push are correct, we as people will sadly learn the hard way by ruining peoples lives. I guess what some here suggest is it wrong to be concerned with people's well being if it goes against their ideology.

The funny thing about all of this is nobody even told you it's a gay thing only. Since when does 40% of pedophilia cases involving homosexuals = 100%?

If you want to stick to that, please do use the quote button and point out where I said all gay people or only gay people are involved in pedophilia casses. Then also point out where I stated that all pride parades are highly sexualized and contain children. You can keep making those accusations yet have not a shred of evidence to back up that I ever suggested such. That's what I mean, rather than reading the words I wrote people would rather see what they want to see and attach false accusations. If I had actually said such things it would be fairly simple for you to quote my sentence.

Obviously, pedophilia is terrible whether it's gay or straight or whatever.

Of course, we should have a discussion about it. But to focus on the gay aspect is not really right. And if we bring up the heterosexual aspect, that should be considered as well.

No, I don't read the "left-wing media." I'm not influenced by it. I'm influenced by what I believe makes sense. I don't believe a lot of this PC crap makes sense, by the way.

I am a purely straight, "Cis" male.

Of course, we are against pedophilia in any shape or form. We believe, firmly, that a person who does this sort of thing should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

Like I said, if I had watched a commentator speaking about pedophilia involving straight people I would be posting information about that. Since when is discussing current news I watch pretending that it only exists within the gay community, factually it exists within all sexual orientations.

Just think of it like this, had I previously seen a commentator speaking about a straight club involving kids taking off cloths and dancing for money, or a little girl posing with a basically naked man, how many people do you think will step in to insist that by discussing that current news I'm attacking straight people and asking me why I'm only mentioning straight people? I'm 100% sure that no one would, would I be wrong in that assumption?

One has to realize that gay men have been the victim of this sort of generalization previously, and have had stuff done to them as a result. Major stuff.

Because of the assumption that all gay men are pedophiles because they only desire young boys.

It was widely assumed, in the 1970s, that gay men always sought out much younger people for sex, and that they were otherwise pedophiles in general.

This originated, perhaps, in the fact that men in the Greek upper class, during the Classical Period (about 500-200 BC), used to have adolescent boy lovers as a matter of course.

Why do you keep on talking about pedophilia in the LGBT community? Surely, the news outlet in your area talks about other things on occasion. LGBT people are in the minority, so it’s kind of odd that this would keep on coming up unless one is actively looking for it.

People are going to doubt your motives if you keep on mentioning these specific scenarios. There are other things to talk about. If you want to avoid being seen as homophobic, I’d avoid these topics for awhile.

Funny thing is pedophilia tends to be ignored by mainstream media. I had heard that about a year ago and decided to look into it. To my surprise all it takes is a Google search to see many recent casses of sex trafficking rings being brought down, some involving hundreds of people. Pedophilia is exploding behind the scenes and only local news is writing articles about it, you don't really hear about it in any mainstream media. As well as current FBI investigations and reports saying that in the last few years, not only is pedophilia exploding, but also the illegal content on the internet containing children becoming more extreme, like rape films, snuff films, bondage and domination films involving children. As well as the age keeps dropping, so now exists ton of material of kids being sexualy abused as young as only months old, not even 1 year old.

I've already explained that several times, why can't people pick up on the meaning of words and sentences? Why must I have to correct every individual? As for the answer, it's because it is the "current news reports" I watched.

Being I have already explained this countless times in this one little thread, let me ask you a question. Why do people discuss current news they read or watch?

Last edited by Crimadella on 20 Jun 2019, 10:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

Do the specific news outlets you watch have an anti-gay agenda? That wouldn’t surprise me.

Are you making sure that your information is coming from credible sources?

I don’t think that pedophilia is increasing to the extent that you are suggesting.

If you find straight pedophilia, we'll comment on that---just like we're commenting on the gay pedophilia.

There is a history of making the assumption that all gay men were pedophiles. It was not assumed that all straight men were pedophiles.

Pedophilia is pedophilia----no matter how you slice it.

Well you would be wrong, try doing a Google search, seeking information is much better than taking a wild guess at it. Right now, Google search this and see how many articles you get. "Pedophilia child sex ring investigation arrests FBI 2018 2019"

If I do a Google search, I'll find lots of straight pedophilia, as well as gay pedophilia.

There have been people who have killed kids right after they abused them. That's been happening since time began, I believe. Both gay and straight.

Perhaps the incidence is increasing----but, perhaps, not.

The media has become more omnipresent in recent years. Much more is exposed by the media these days.

I can't help what history did. The problem I have is I haven't once stated that it only exists within the gay community yet people keep making that assumption simply because the recent news I watched contains gay people. In fact, you can read back through my messages and see that I have repeatedly stated specifically that all gay people are not pedophiles and all pedophilia cases do not involve gay people. The statistics I presented came from someone quoting the FBI, if people don't like that explain to the FBI of how their statistics are homophobic and they should change them. The statistics also state that the other 60% are committed by straight people.


You are making points that I already know and have already stated. Like I said, you don't think I'm correct, bother looking the information up with a simple little google search. The comment I made about pedophilia getting much worse was me quoting an article I read which came from statements the FBI told a journalist. They even added the fact that the issue is largely being ignored by mainstream media. Pedophilia rings are getting busted left and right up to current times, when is the last time you heard of one? Should I really have to state obvious information with every single post? When I said pedophilia is getting much worse, I generalized pedophillia, not pedophilia within the gay community. Sheesh!

Point taken.

How's the weather in your neck of the woods?

Sunny, hot, muggy?