Steven Crowder & Big Tech Influence on Free Speech | Bret We
Steven Crowder & Big Tech Influence on Free Speech | Bret Weinstein.
Length of video: 9 minutes.
https://youtu.be/RGvI0O82fF0
But it's not really an influence on 'free speech', as in: speech is still free. He's not being prosecuted. He just isn't granted access to certain platforms which shape public discourse, no?
Did people talk about free speech being endangered when it was books and TV and some books were rejected by publishers and people weren't asked to come on TV?
We definitely should be talking about private companies - and tv and news etc- shaping public opinion
- perception of reality, really.
(Manufacturing consent, anyone?)
But I don't get how this is actually a free speech issue, as in, a question of the state prohibiting opinions.
Am I getting this totally wrong?
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.
It is censorship in this context.
That's the whole issue....a publisher is a publisher, a platform is open to the public and not responsible for lawsuits for the content on their platform. It was also ruled in supreme court that these big platforms of public discourse are the digital town square. Steven crowder did not break any rules, even youtube stated so. If they are censoring public opinios that break no rules they are controlling the narritive in a digital town square. Also, them censoring public opinion is acting as a publisher while in courts they claim to be a platform.
In otherwords, no, it is no where near the same as a book publisher choosing to not publish particular opinions....platform, publisher, two completely different things.
In otherwords, no, it is no where near the same as a book publisher choosing to not publish particular opinions....platform, publisher, two completely different things.
Fair enough. I never bought the 'platform' thing though. I always considered them publishers, simply because they have control over the thing, and it's not a utility. - a town square isn't privately owned.
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.
Steven Crowder broke the rules surrounding YouTube's partnership programme (basically "don't homophobically abuse people in your videos"), so he is no longer allowed to make money from his YouTube videos.
He is still allowed to upload his videos.
Hard to argue that constitutes censorship. It would be deeply illiberal to force YouTube to pay him.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
I am a bad influence. |
24 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm |
The influence of the Internet on your life |
09 Apr 2024, 9:32 pm |
Anybody working from home in tech field |
28 Feb 2024, 9:59 am |
Free Will or Otherwise |
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am |