The "Power Elite" in politics using media 2 gaslight victims

Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 

madbutnotmad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,678
Location: Jersey UK

21 Jul 2019, 12:40 am

Here is a conspiracy that you may not have heard of

Some years ago in 2007 a man wrote a heated email to several tabloid newspapers following the death of a family member (where his family member died of a drug overdose) that speculated to the real reason why the then war against the Taliban was being thought, labelling the war as a "real x-file" in that the war against terror which everyone is led to believe is a war against evil religious Afghanistan Taliban terrorists who have twisted perception of the world and who hate capitalism, America and the rest of the western world to such an extent that they want to kill everyone,
but which is to a greater part more than simply a war against evil religious terrorists but a war where the US and the UK are fighting in order to secure territory so that they can seize power over the many Opium fields as well as the factories that refine the opium into heroin, not so as to put a stop to the factories but so as to seize control over them for personal gain.

Now this email, due to being labelled "real x-file/s" was then twisted by the journalists who read it, including the many journalists who are politically aligned (almost all journalists have some political alignment, whether due to their own values or simply due to good old fashion capitalism and because they are sycophants).

At that time, the UK Prime minister panicked and immediately flew out to Afghanistan. I remember seeing him on the news looking extremely sheepish.

From that day on-wards many of the biggest tabloid newspapers and media companies apparently started to gaslight the individual on an epic proportion, globally!

Not long after this gas lighting episode started, the economic crisis of 2007 occurred.
And incredibly enough, the same person who wrote the "real x-files" email, did something even more incredible.
During the economic crisis, during a time that everyone panicked and were in a state of shock, not knowing what to do, including the UK Prime Minister, during a more than bigger hate campaign aimed at the then Prime Minister from all the other politicians and journalists including his own supporters. during a time that the then PM was emotionally and physically exhausted and cracking under the pressure, and had dropped to an all time low in the polls of 0%, and a vote by his own party of no confidence.

The same person who write the "real x-files" email started writing to the then PM with moral encouragement and advice on various matters including economic theory. These emails, which lasted at the beginning a few weeks but were later prolonged for approximately 3 years, got the then PM to change his outlook and fight for his career, country and what he believed in, and without a doubt it saved his career, quiet possibly his life and parties credibility (as the party went from 0% in the polls to actually gaining the most votes in the election, but missing out on winning the election because the other two dominant political parties made an agreement to join forces and rule together.

The scenario where one political party in the UK government wins the most votes in an election but where two opposing parties have enough votes that if combined create a higher number of votes than the dominant is called a hung parliament, as although one party has the most votes, if two of the dominant parties combine the number of their votes they could then potentially create a majority when combined.

Its called a hung parliament because although one party is dominant, a combined majority could be created in a number of ways, and by doing so would put one or the other dominant parties in power.

Example 1. Labour = 39 % Conservative 27% Liberal Democrats 15%
Logically if this was the results of an election, Labour would be the clear winner.
And this is similar to the outcome in the 2010 UK election.

However,
there is a rule in the election that allows for more than one party to combine their votes in order to create a combined rule. Before this agreement is made, a hung parliament exists.

In the situation above, more than one outcome could have resulted.
Labour = 39% plus Lib Dem = 15% = combined total of Labour and Lib Dem = 54% / compared to Conservative = 27%

Alternatively
Labours dominant 39% could be beaten if Lib Dem's 15% is combined to the Conservative's 27% resulting in a combined majority of 42 %, which is greater than Labours 39%.

Nonetheless, during this time, the "real x-files" author, saved the Labour PM's career with his coaching and ghost writing. But doing so did him no favours, as the UK journalists / politicians and aligned entertainers (propagandists)
continued to gaslight their victim, despite him arguably saving the UK economy with his advice.

Nonetheless, the victim, continues to be gas lighted by practically everyone in the entertainment industry / journalism / politics despite him not doing anything illegal.

If the truth were to be known, the same guy was also being gas lighted by certain toxic people in the entertainment industry due to other reasons, again, reasons that have no legal value.

So, Gas lighting on an epic proportion, as well as the blatant invasion of privacy required to collect intel on the victim has continued for over a decade. And for the victim, due to the power of those who instigated the campaign
there is little that the victim can do. Even though gas lighting, cyber stalking and eavesdropping is completely illegal.

So. perhaps someone should learn to put out the light of the gas lighters.
This is the state of "democracy" and first world human rights, which project one image while at the same time the people in power and influence blatantly abuse their own laws.

But i guess the UK is related to the Great British Empire, so nothing new there really...



Mountain Goat
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 13 May 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,202
Location: .

21 Jul 2019, 3:32 am

You have explained a lot to me why I have been followed the last 30 years.


_________________
.