Countries
Is there such thing as a friendly foreign country?
It is interesting that the word in English for a person's national origin is "ethnic" as in ethic origin Ex.....
And "ethnic" which means in Greek lacking in "ethikos" which meant morality or morals.This come from Greek speaking early Christians calling the pagan nations "ethnic" because they thought they lacked morals.
And the phrase caught on and people started calling any person from a foreign country "ethnic" and today ethnic simply means your national origin.
I think throughout history people have always saw there culture as right and other countries as wrong.And likely all countries have there faults which are obvious to other countries and we see the faults of other countries as obvious as well.Hence the world filled conflict and countries make temporary alliances because they have mutual enemies there more concerned about.
It's the old "my enemies,enemy is my friend" and that is the root of most international alliances.
So I guess in the end all countries are out for themselves and friendships are just temporary conveniences.
I suppose the answer to your question would be NO.
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
The short answer is no ...by definition all sovereign nations ("sovereign" for practical purposes simply means "having your own standing army") live by "the law of the fish"(as the Chinese say), or "the law of the jungle"(was westerners say).
But some combinations of cooperative countries are both "friends and allies", and others are "just allies". For example in WWII the UK and the USA could be said to be "both friends and allies" ( shared values and like that). But the relationship between either the UK or the USA with Stalin/the USSR would be better described as "allies but not exactly friends".
What surprises me is:
A. You don't know know that those other countries are also racially and ethnically diverse.
B. A nation can be defined by any common identity, which does not have to be racial or ethnic.
One of the problems, with Americans is that they seem so fixated on The Second World War and the Early Cold War, that they forget all about the events previous to the 20th Century: the American Revolt, the War of 1812, and the Napoleonic War. Moreover, however one may feel about either Russians or Germans; I would argue here, that they were the way they were, and did what they did, due to how both Russia and Germany were surrounded, and played against each other by the French and the British, among other Colonial Powers. So much comparing and contrasting between Stalin and Hitler, yet Napoleon Bonaparte, and even King George the Third, are much forgotten.
Indeed, much of both Russian and German militarism, I would argue here, was in reaction to French and British Colonialism. What do the rest of you think? I wonder!
If I remember, King George is dead and his policies are long gone. (You do know that the British monarchy is no longer a political institution in regards to UK policy.)
Interesting question. Lets take Germany and Russia.
Currently, which of these two countries: interfered with our election to sow discord; are aiding opposite sides of conflict we are engaged in; have cooperative military and intelligence agreements with us; support our international objectives; etc...
Sure, every country has its own interests and who is friendly can change over the course of history. Right now, Russia is a great threat to this nation. Germany is not, but we are also harming that relationship.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,790
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
One of the problems, with Americans is that they seem so fixated on The Second World War and the Early Cold War, that they forget all about the events previous to the 20th Century: the American Revolt, the War of 1812, and the Napoleonic War. Moreover, however one may feel about either Russians or Germans; I would argue here, that they were the way they were, and did what they did, due to how both Russia and Germany were surrounded, and played against each other by the French and the British, among other Colonial Powers. So much comparing and contrasting between Stalin and Hitler, yet Napoleon Bonaparte, and even King George the Third, are much forgotten.
Indeed, much of both Russian and German militarism, I would argue here, was in reaction to French and British Colonialism. What do the rest of you think? I wonder!
If I remember, King George is dead and his policies are long gone. (You do know that the British monarchy is no longer a political institution in regards to UK policy.)
Interesting question. Lets take Germany and Russia.
Currently, which of these two countries: interfered with our election to sow discord; are aiding opposite sides of conflict we are engaged in; have cooperative military and intelligence agreements with us; support our international objectives; etc...
Sure, every country has its own interests and who is friendly can change over the course of history. Right now, Russia is a great threat to this nation. Germany is not, but we are also harming that relationship.
I think if we get rid of the orange turd, then everything will be okay with us and the Germans again.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
The current US president does - indeed - appear to be relevant to the deteriorated relations between the US and Germany.
Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020 ... rus-badly/
It is interesting that the word in English for a person's national origin is "ethnic" as in ethic origin Ex.....
And "ethnic" which means in Greek lacking in "ethikos" which meant morality or morals.This come from Greek speaking early Christians calling the pagan nations "ethnic" because they thought they lacked morals.
And the phrase caught on and people started calling any person from a foreign country "ethnic" and today ethnic simply means your national origin.
I think throughout history people have always saw there culture as right and other countries as wrong.And likely all countries have there faults which are obvious to other countries and we see the faults of other countries as obvious as well.Hence the world filled conflict and countries make temporary alliances because they have mutual enemies there more concerned about.
It's the old "my enemies,enemy is my friend" and that is the root of most international alliances.
So I guess in the end all countries are out for themselves and friendships are just temporary conveniences.
I suppose the answer to your question would be NO.
Sorry for the late answer. My answer to your question is NO.
A planet with more than 1 country makes polarisation, not only countries, religion have the same mechanism.
The most danger from today is the invisible country. I mean the multinationals who infiltrate in the visible countries.
These invisible countries among the countries are not a unity, the multinationals who based on China are different than the invisible powers from India, Russia, and the west.
It is interesting that the word in English for a person's national origin is "ethnic" as in ethic origin Ex.....
And "ethnic" which means in Greek lacking in "ethikos" which meant morality or morals.This come from Greek speaking early Christians calling the pagan nations "ethnic" because they thought they lacked morals.
And the phrase caught on and people started calling any person from a foreign country "ethnic" and today ethnic simply means your national origin.
I think throughout history people have always saw there culture as right and other countries as wrong.And likely all countries have there faults which are obvious to other countries and we see the faults of other countries as obvious as well.Hence the world filled conflict and countries make temporary alliances because they have mutual enemies there more concerned about.
Also of note is the word "nation".
The word "nation" is related to all of those words with "nat" in them like "nativity scene", and "prenatal care". Its derived from the word for "birth". Your 'nation' is both the piece of land, and the tribe, into which you were born.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,462
Location: Long Island, New York
Him, I assume
Banksy
Banksy displays his art on publicly visible surfaces such as walls and self-built physical prop pieces. Banksy no longer sells photographs or reproductions of his street graffiti, but his public "installations" are regularly resold, often even by removing the wall they were painted on.[6] A small number of Banksy's works are officially, non-publicly, sold through Pest Control. Banksy's documentary film Exit Through the Gift Shop (2010) made its debut at the 2010 Sundance Film Festival. In January 2011, he was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature for the film. In 2014, he was awarded Person of the Year at the 2014 Webby Awards.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
It is Autism Acceptance Month
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
All the 5 rings have the same size, and they are connected with each other.
A good medicine against nationalism and religion.
That's why I love The Olympics and the Olympic flag. Can't we all just get along, instead of making each other feel unwelcome?
_________________
Who wants to adopt a Sweet Pea?
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
All the 5 rings have the same size, and they are connected with each other.
A good medicine against nationalism and religion.
That's why I love The Olympics and the Olympic flag. Can't we all just get along, instead of making each other feel unwelcome?
Actually no, not really, when the US, Russia and China take up to 90% of gold medals, the other countries feel really inferior; it reminds us of the wealth gap in the world.