Countries
The Germans started WW 2 by invading Poland in 1939.
Maybe the Marco Polo Bridge thing could have been some sort of precursor.
Rather like saying Rock and roll started with rhythm and blues. Rhythm and blues (by the 40s definition, not the present-day definition) was a strong precursor to rock and roll—and some rhythm and blues was rock and roll. But fully-realized rock and roll started in the early 50s.
kraftiekortie wrote:
The Germans started WW 2 by invading Poland in 1939.
Maybe the Marco Polo Bridge thing could have been some sort of precursor.
Rather like saying Rock and roll started with rhythm and blues. Rhythm and blues (by the 40s definition, not the present-day definition) was a strong precursor to rock and roll—and some rhythm and blues was rock and roll. But fully-realized rock and roll started in the early 50s.
Maybe the Marco Polo Bridge thing could have been some sort of precursor.
Rather like saying Rock and roll started with rhythm and blues. Rhythm and blues (by the 40s definition, not the present-day definition) was a strong precursor to rock and roll—and some rhythm and blues was rock and roll. But fully-realized rock and roll started in the early 50s.
Still, none who know what the Russians and Chinese did, in the name of Communism, during the 20th Century would ever dare say that the German people, as a people, are Uniquely Evil. After all, the Soviet Communists and the Chinese Communists did carry out many, many of the very same types of military atrocities and crimes against Humanity that are usually associated with the National Socialists of Germany. They had many Prison Camps as well, and though they may not have exactly had those vast homicidal gas chambers, the Russians and Chinese Communists had all sorts of horrid and vicious ways to torture, butcher, and work to death their victims in their Prison Camp systems. Indeed, if National Socialism is no condemned, why should not Communism be similarly condemned? Now, answer me that.
Metal Rat wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Metal Rat wrote:
America is a Globalist Country. Perhaps, the only one of its kind. Very funny, to listen to "Christians" babble on and on about the Illuminati, and how America is supposedly a Christian Nation, when the truth of the matter is that the Founders of America were, almost to a man, Freemasons. That is precisely where the idea of Deism came from, incidentally enough. Deism is a Freemasonic concept.
Funny how you hide your paranoid rants between the lines. What you're saying ON the lines is ok: that the American state was founded by committee who were more influenced by the secular philopsophers of the Englightenment than by fanatical Christianity, and many were Diests, and were also members of the Free Masons.
But what you're saying between the lines: that the world is controlled by a sinister cabal of globalist Free Masons (why not throw in the Illumanatti as well?)is a little too psychotic for me to swallow.
Well, America is against any and all forms of Nationalism. They are not only against any form of Black Nationalism, but also against White Nationalism as well. Though America is prejudiced against Blacks, it does not follow from there that it is prejudiced in favor of Whites. Does not get more Globalist than America!
America is not historically "prejudiced towards Whites"?
If you say so Mein Fuhrer.
naturalplastic wrote:
Metal Rat wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Metal Rat wrote:
America is a Globalist Country. Perhaps, the only one of its kind. Very funny, to listen to "Christians" babble on and on about the Illuminati, and how America is supposedly a Christian Nation, when the truth of the matter is that the Founders of America were, almost to a man, Freemasons. That is precisely where the idea of Deism came from, incidentally enough. Deism is a Freemasonic concept.
Funny how you hide your paranoid rants between the lines. What you're saying ON the lines is ok: that the American state was founded by committee who were more influenced by the secular philopsophers of the Englightenment than by fanatical Christianity, and many were Diests, and were also members of the Free Masons.
But what you're saying between the lines: that the world is controlled by a sinister cabal of globalist Free Masons (why not throw in the Illumanatti as well?)is a little too psychotic for me to swallow.
Well, America is against any and all forms of Nationalism. They are not only against any form of Black Nationalism, but also against White Nationalism as well. Though America is prejudiced against Blacks, it does not follow from there that it is prejudiced in favor of Whites. Does not get more Globalist than America!
America is not historically "prejudiced towards Whites"?
If you say so Mein Fuhrer.
Well, it depends, precisely, on what types of Whites one means. In the olden days, back before The Second World War, there were levels of Whiteness. Some Whites were considered Whiter than others. The Anglo Saxons believed themselves to be above not only Blacks and Hispanics, but other White Ethnic groups, like the Irish and Italians.
Seems, that ever since the 1950's, America has shifted. Shifted in many considerable ways. Ironically, Hitler and his Nazis actually admired the Eugenic and other White Supremacist practices of America, back during his rise to power. Nowadays, though, it would actually seem that America is prejudiced against Whites, Germans particularly.
TheCherokeeRosePrince
Deinonychus
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 385
Location: The Garden of Georgia Roses
TheCherokeeRosePrince
Deinonychus
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 385
Location: The Garden of Georgia Roses
kraftiekortie wrote:
You don’t know too many people, then.
Get out there, and actually meet some folks, and hang out with them.
Get out there, and actually meet some folks, and hang out with them.
Individual people may be pleasant enough, but as a whole we humans are slowly destroying everything including each other. We are like the cancer of the earth. I don't think any other animals are contributing to the destruction of the planet the way we are.
Maybe it was all predestined by some divine creator with a cruel sense of humor? Talk about self-fufilling prophecy!
_________________
♡◇ ♧♤
Metal Rat wrote:
"Today, racism is regarded as a crime if practiced by a majority—but as an inalienable right if practiced by a minority. The notion that one’s culture is superior to all others solely because it represents the traditions of one’s ancestors, is regarded as chauvinism if claimed by a majority—but as “ethnic” pride if claimed by a minority. Resistance to change and progress is regarded as reactionary if demonstrated by a majority—but retrogression to a Balkan village, to an Indian tepee or to the jungle is hailed if demonstrated by a minority."---- what Ayn Rand had to say about Racism and Ethnic Pride!
As always, Rand is sorta half right but omits the interesting parts and jumps to a conclusion: the majority she speaks of is a western, white majority, who, through the power of their enlightenment , claim universalism, and deny the ethnic minority such a claim.
The white western people express their supremacy through their 'progressiveness', prohibiting the minority access to its institutions if they don't totally assimilate and adopt white western ideas of what counts as progressive.
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.
shlaifu wrote:
Metal Rat wrote:
"Today, racism is regarded as a crime if practiced by a majority—but as an inalienable right if practiced by a minority. The notion that one’s culture is superior to all others solely because it represents the traditions of one’s ancestors, is regarded as chauvinism if claimed by a majority—but as “ethnic” pride if claimed by a minority. Resistance to change and progress is regarded as reactionary if demonstrated by a majority—but retrogression to a Balkan village, to an Indian tepee or to the jungle is hailed if demonstrated by a minority."---- what Ayn Rand had to say about Racism and Ethnic Pride!
As always, Rand is sorta half right but omits the interesting parts and jumps to a conclusion: the majority she speaks of is a western, white majority, who, through the power of their enlightenment , claim universalism, and deny the ethnic minority such a claim.
The white western people express their supremacy through their 'progressiveness', prohibiting the minority access to its institutions if they don't totally assimilate and adopt white western ideas of what counts as progressive.
Very interesting. Still, Blacks who hate Whites are never as condemned, by the US Media, as Whites who hate Blacks. Louis Farrakhan is never as condemned as say his opposite number David Duke.
Of course, Liberals whine about how they cannot blame Louis Farrakhan for hating Whites, due to Slavery. Still, what is intriguing is what happens when Louis Farrakhan switches his attention to Jews!
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
The Countries Least Accepting Of Autistic Individuals |
25 Mar 2024, 3:27 pm |
Autism in non-English-speaking countries |
10 Feb 2024, 5:42 pm |