Conservative promise of a hard Brexit would be worse
Full title that I can't fit in .
"Conservative promise of a hard Brexit would be worse for the UK economy than Labour’s radical spending plans"
What prompted this election was the inability of parliament to resolve Brexit. Yet the two major parties have devoted little time to actually explaining how Brexit will affect the country’s future. Nonetheless, what is on offer is a clear choice between doing Brexit (the Conservatives) and ending austerity (Labour).
In many ways these two options are inextricably linked, of course. Research shows that parts of the country that were badly affected by austerity saw a large rise in support for the UK Independence Party and Brexit. But, having surveyed the academic literature on the economic effects of Brexit, it is clear that “getting Brexit done” will deeply hurt the UK economy across the board and likely cause austerity to continue.
https://theconversation.com/conservativ ... ans-128570
Econmist Mark Blyth thinks,5 years post Brexit, Britain will be back to being okay-ish.
The question is, who would have to take the blame - or why would Labour do this to themselves? - so his guess is: either Corbyn gets to fundamentally reform Britain, or the Tories will have to Brexit and deal with the aftermath, and Corbyn gets to watch the party of Margaret Thatcher fall apart.
I like Corbyn.
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.
Article doesn’t actually talk about the impact of Corbyn’s policies at all so think the headline is a bit misleading. Yes, some of his pledges have been criticised for being impossible (the tree planting pledge foremost amongst them) but the main concern is that he wants to spend a lot of money nationalising things at below market value, which could be terrible for investor confidence and doesn’t offer any benefits.
Breaks my heart! Though the British, the English in particular, may think they are hurting the Germans by leaving the EU, they may, indeed, end up hurting themselves. After all, what if Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland decide to, in their turn, succeed from the United Kingdom? What then?
The problem has been that without being in a position to threaten to walk away (no-deal), all the negotiations look to have been made in a way that was either directly against Britains interests, or not in the best terms that could have been made - It's like being told you have to purchase an item, but you are only permitted to buy from one store, even though there are others that may have better prices/offers/support etc....The store has all the power, while the buyer is in a "take it or leave it" position.
Should the Conservatives win, it will lessen the EU's position as they can't just put whatever they want in, knowing it has to be accepted and also knowing that if they don't offer "reasonable" terms then none of the things they wanted kept will be in place following the split.
Personally, I don't know if the conservatives WOULD have followed through with a no-deal if they had the option to do so, but preventing them from at least being able to threaten to do so was probably one of the worst moves that Labour could have made...They would have been much better placed to require any potential deal to be confirmed by parliament, but leave open the "no deal" possibility, as it looks like they would have had the numbers to prevent that outcome. Now (if the polls are correct), they could lose the chance of retaining any of the things they may have wanted (and may have received) by not having allowing the conservatives to negotiate with the EU on equal terms with all options open, but the ability to veto any deal they did not like (which I guess was any deal that involved leaving the EU).
The problem has been that without being in a position to threaten to walk away (no-deal), all the negotiations look to have been made in a way that was either directly against Britains interests, or not in the best terms that could have been made - It's like being told you have to purchase an item, but you are only permitted to buy from one store, even though there are others that may have better prices/offers/support etc....The store has all the power, while the buyer is in a "take it or leave it" position.
Should the Conservatives win, it will lessen the EU's position as they can't just put whatever they want in, knowing it has to be accepted and also knowing that if they don't offer "reasonable" terms then none of the things they wanted kept will be in place following the split.
Personally, I don't know if the conservatives WOULD have followed through with a no-deal if they had the option to do so, but preventing them from at least being able to threaten to do so was probably one of the worst moves that Labour could have made...They would have been much better placed to require any potential deal to be confirmed by parliament, but leave open the "no deal" possibility, as it looks like they would have had the numbers to prevent that outcome. Now (if the polls are correct), they could lose the chance of retaining any of the things they may have wanted (and may have received) by not having allowing the conservatives to negotiate with the EU on equal terms with all options open, but the ability to veto any deal they did not like (which I guess was any deal that involved leaving the EU).
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
My Flashbacks are getting worse |
22 Apr 2024, 10:26 pm |
Mold on Bread May Be Worse Than You Think |
19 Mar 2024, 2:38 pm |
Kid's behavior got far worse recently |
14 Apr 2024, 2:15 pm |
It’s Very Hard Having Aspergers |
08 Mar 2024, 7:58 pm |