Tempus Fugit wrote:
magz wrote:
Hmmm, you see no difference between lying and being wrong?
If I was making stuff up about someone, then I would be saying things about them that are untrue. I don't see how being wrong cancels out saying things that are untrue, bearing false witness against someone, and stating that it will continue. There's no practical way to work out repeated misrepresentation that's delivered in a contemptuous, sarcastic, demeaning, insulting way, as "oh they just misunderstood". <removed> has been at it for weeks in several threads. I'm convinced he knows exactly what he's doing. I would know if I was doing it. That goes for <removed> too.
Is them leaving me alone too much to ask?
Is asking them to stop cranking out toxicity too much to ask?
It happens to me too.
<squawk> has been attacking me for years.
It got to a point where I had enough and told <squawk> off.
And <bock-ark> is another one who will basically take the opposite view, no matter what I say.
The trouble is, I usually have strong thought out reason for saying what I do, so if <squawk>, <bock-ark> and <hoo-hoo> argue against me, they usually end up with egg on the face.
"Devil's advocacy" is doggy doo-doo, in my book.
I'd rather just have a normal honest conversation. There have been those here where that was possible.