Misslizard wrote:
People forget how old his books are.He did wartime satire during the rise of Hitler.
His portrayal of the Japanese would be offensive today,but at that time we were at war.
It’s ridiculous to toss out all his books.
https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/201 ... f-dr-seussAmerica has first ammendment.
Adults can read what they like.
Kids can read whatever school or parents let them read.
No reason why kids should be reading racist books.
And I doubt this is the first time they've been 'banned'.
Adults can read whatever they like.
School libraries/school boards/teachers/even public libraries have a right to choose what kids read.
Without that, back in the 90s, boys (heck no section 28 so girls too) would've been reading Playboy in the school library. Adults can act in loco parentus.
And I'm saying this as someone who was allowed to read racist books (Enid Blyton) as a kid & loved them but wasn't allowed to read Disney books with sound effects because 'they rot the brain'
So what? Mum's choice.
Mum didn't let me read Dr Seuss either. I read them at granddad's house. It wasn't for what in those days was called PC reasons, I think it was cos the Cat was naughty but then she let me read My Naughty Little Sister so idk what it was...
_________________
Not actually a girl
He/him