This is BS!

Post Reply New Topic

A bribe is when someone makes an offer regarding personal gain, like a mobster offering a yacht to a prosecutor. Offering for professional gain is a different story, especially when the info benefits the entire profession and not just one professional. Case in point, watch the movie Catch Me If You Can starring Tom Hanka and Leonardo DiCaprio. It is based on a true story and kind of relates to what I am trying to explain.

Then you are out of luck.  There is no one on this website who can fight your battles for you.  Only an appropriately-trained and licensed legal professional can help you now -- not a bunch of strangers with various forms of ASD.

I am not asking for any help other than help as far as asking for everyone to write their Congressmen to address how things need to be addressed better for law enforcement at all levels to understand how to handle spectrum disorders more fairly and effectively.

I have even had one department tell me they refuse to accommodate any ADA request with the one exception of a doctor specifically diagnosing autism and ignored all other disabilities from questioning PDD-NOS to even a paralyzed person refusing to walk a straight line for a sobriety test.

Yeah ... sure ... that will work ...

... not!

Not sure where you live but have you tried social services? If your a vulnerable adult they are obligated to do something about it.

Not sure what you mean by quid pro quo? what favour do you have to offer law enforcement? unless the person is or would be of interest to law enforcement like an underworld figure or big drug dealer you would have nothing of interest to offer.

The person in question is no major dealer or anything, but I seemed to have stumbled across a couple of hundred million dollars to add back into the government's budget during the current financial situation plus another word or two about how to better train and educate law enforcement on a more broad note not limited specifically to disabled people.

What exactly does your family do to you that results in you having cuts and bruises?

My advice would be to go to A&E next time you have been physically hurt and get the doctor to write up a report. Many hospitals also can provide a social worker to properly submit that report to police. It sucks that is whats necessary and is total BS that we don't just believe victims of abuse but thats the world we live in.

Only cuts and bruises have been from hoodlums in my area and someone who used to be married into the family. But to be honest I would prefer fist fights over the psychological abuse I have had to endure more of. At least a fist fight is over in 3 minutes or less and is easier to strategize for.

I hope you don't mind my inquisitiveness.

In your initial post, you mention dealing with a narcissist family member. Is that the family member (who used to be married into the family) who gave you the cuts and bruises? What did they do to you to make you cut and bruised? What manner of psychological abuse are you experiencing? In what manner are you being abused?

The family member who gave me the actual cuts and bruises is now divorced from the family, but the narcissist who has a tendency to manipulate others into giving me cuts and bruises is a blood relative. The same blood relative has even threatened me with lengthy jail sentences all because I have told people stories about dealing with catfish in online dating like the story where one girl asked for my bank account number and I explained a BS story about how the condition of my parole prevent me from having one.

I'm trying to work out the specifics of what's happening. For some reason, you seem unwilling or unable to be specific about the details in question.

You keep referring to "cuts and bruises" in the vaguest of terms such as "family gave them to me" or "others were manipulated into giving them to me" - but haven't actually explained in detail the events that led up to being cut and bruised, or how exactly you were cut and bruised as a result of what actions. How does this family member manipulate others into cutting and bruising you, and by what actions do others cause you to be cut and bruised?

That may be how he is "framing his case", and may also explain why no one takes him seriously.

Put it this way, when I was eleven, my mother married an ex golden glove boxer with a short fuse who attempted to apply the rules of the ring for a form of discipline when I used profanity or something and she expected me to take it with gratitude and use the rope-a-dope as my only strategy "in the ring"

This all reminds me of a street-person who tried to convince a police officer that my Ham Radio antennas were allegedly beaming thoughts into his head and/or stealing his memories.  Instead of offering evidence (of which there could be none), he would go on and on about how he got fired soon after I had put up my first antenna, and how his employment history became progressively worse as time went on.

He also cited incidents from his childhood -- streetlights allegedly flickering on or off when he looked at them, dogs allegedly barking his name in Morse Code, strange bruises and cuts on his arms for which he allegedly could not account, lights allegedly moving in the sky above his parents' home, et cetera -- nothing relevant, but certainly entertaining.

Was that the person who is gone, or is that the person still around? That's still really vague, and tells me nothing of what happened. It's like saying "stuff happened". What exactly did they do when they "applied the rules of the ring"?

Also, that was when you were 11. What do you expect police to intervene with in the present day. I gather you are no longer 11, nor have you been 11 for some time. It seems like that person is gone now. So what is happening today or recently, something police could actually do something about, that you expect them to intervene? Something more specific than "I'm being abused", or "I've got cuts and bruises".

The former could mean anything, and the latter could be from anything. There's a massive difference between "they hold me down and cut me with knives and beat me with clubs", and "they bought lemon popsicles even though they know I hate lemon, and when I melted down I injured myself in the process". One of those two extremes is worth police intervention. It is generally illegal to hold people down and cut or beat them. The other extreme is not. It is not illegal to buy the wrong popsicle. Being provided the wrong popsicles is not actually abuse, not matter how distressing the person may find it.

Somewhere between those two extremes is a point where the action starts to infringe upon the law, and then the police can intervene. I'm trying to see where your situation sits in relation to that tipping point of legal action.