Page 2 of 3 [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,466
Location: Right over your left shoulder

20 Apr 2021, 11:33 am

Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
The Klan were southern conservatives even when they were Democrats.

He's insisting that allowing people to become citizens reduces the power of his vote and it is part of a plot to weaken the grasp on power conservatives currently have. It's silly for him to suggest that because most of the people who will be made citizens if they're naturalized would be likely Republican voters if the GOP had followed the plans of guys like Mitt Romney and George W Bush instead of listening to their xenophobic base.

Who ever mentioned genocide? One can be a monster without being a genocidal monster.


Replacement Theory is a perceived threat of genocide. I guess it could be a perceived threat of displacement rather than genocide depending on how you see it.


Immigration isn't genocide, pretending that it is and using that to justify adopting more explicitly white supremacist/white nationalist laws is inventing an excuse to codify racism into law.

They don't hide that part of their agenda and they don't hide their anti-democratic leanings. Those who care about liberal democracy are correct in viewing these types as ideological enemies who wish to destroy their society. They're not conservatives anymore, they're not rooted in the liberal democratic ideals that America was founded on. They're reactionary nationalists who believe they can invent the utopia of their nostalgic fantasies if only they just take away enough people's rights or deport them. You're an idiot to support them because their fantasies don't include you either and by the time you realize it odds are it will be too late.


You still believe in this party switch nonsense. Again, go through the Senate in 1973. I don't think you honestly analyze it and arrive at the same conclusion.

The progressives in American are still the racists and segregationist today. Why is it that US pubic schools are among the worst in the developing world? Progressives have funded all schools to more than adequate levels but their segregationist and racist policies have left our African American children stuck in violent, failing schools just so their own kids aren't exposed to a "racial jungle." Even worse, progressives deny African American families better options for their kids though there are many available in all of these cities through other public and private schools. It's an ongoing tradegy.


I wasn't even referring to the civil rights era, what I was describing has been entirely since the civil rights era.

Instead of addressing my points you bring up another issue that you've chosen to narrowly focus on as though failings within the school system are the only matter that contributes to systemic and institutional racism.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

20 Apr 2021, 11:47 am

funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
The Klan were southern conservatives even when they were Democrats.

He's insisting that allowing people to become citizens reduces the power of his vote and it is part of a plot to weaken the grasp on power conservatives currently have. It's silly for him to suggest that because most of the people who will be made citizens if they're naturalized would be likely Republican voters if the GOP had followed the plans of guys like Mitt Romney and George W Bush instead of listening to their xenophobic base.

Who ever mentioned genocide? One can be a monster without being a genocidal monster.


Replacement Theory is a perceived threat of genocide. I guess it could be a perceived threat of displacement rather than genocide depending on how you see it.


Immigration isn't genocide, pretending that it is and using that to justify adopting more explicitly white supremacist/white nationalist laws is inventing an excuse to codify racism into law.

They don't hide that part of their agenda and they don't hide their anti-democratic leanings. Those who care about liberal democracy are correct in viewing these types as ideological enemies who wish to destroy their society. They're not conservatives anymore, they're not rooted in the liberal democratic ideals that America was founded on. They're reactionary nationalists who believe they can invent the utopia of their nostalgic fantasies if only they just take away enough people's rights or deport them. You're an idiot to support them because their fantasies don't include you either and by the time you realize it odds are it will be too late.


You still believe in this party switch nonsense. Again, go through the Senate in 1973. I don't think you honestly analyze it and arrive at the same conclusion.

The progressives in American are still the racists and segregationist today. Why is it that US pubic schools are among the worst in the developing world? Progressives have funded all schools to more than adequate levels but their segregationist and racist policies have left our African American children stuck in violent, failing schools just so their own kids aren't exposed to a "racial jungle." Even worse, progressives deny African American families better options for their kids though there are many available in all of these cities through other public and private schools. It's an ongoing tragedy.


I wasn't even referring to the civil rights era, what I was describing has been entirely since the civil rights era.

Instead of addressing my points you bring up another issue that you've chosen to narrowly focus on as though failings within the school system are the only matter that contributes to systemic and institutional racism.


You started this talking about the klan and civil rights and now are moving the goal posts. Sorry but it's tough to follow.

The civil rights era is still with us and that's the point. Segregation throughout our society is still there and is still supported by those who continue to call themselves progressives. Our president is one of those segregationists and progressives. You can't run from that reality simply because it destroys your worldview.



salad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2011
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,226

20 Apr 2021, 12:58 pm

Daddy63 wrote:
salad wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
salad wrote:
As much as I hate the ADL Tucker Carlson's comments were deeply racist and anti-Semitic.


Now you're making stuff up to call someone Anti-Semitic. Did you even watch the real video? When did he say something racist or even talk about someone being Jewish?

This is fabricated nonsense and you fell for it.



Rich, coming from the guy who called me anti-Semitic for not supporting Israel, when I'm Palestinian LMAO :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Buddy after last time talking to you where I publicly humiliated you in front of all of WP, where I gave you 1 simple argument to refute that was only 5 sentences long and you spent 4 pages on WP evading and ducking from it and calling me anti-Semitic just for posing a simple argument refuting the IDF being innocent, the fact that you have the audacity to show yourself again and confront me and say I'm wrong for calling out an actual anti-Semitic statement, is so many levels of irony and richness I actually fell out of my chair laughing. You are literally the stupidest member on the entire forum of WP, something I can't say for anyone else. For 4 pages you couldn't even refute a single argument I gave against the IDF without having to resort to name calling and comparing me to Hitler and calling me anti-semitic, and now you dare show your face on WP and call me out ironically for supposedly incorrectly calling someone anti-semitic for peddling an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory, coming from the guy who called me anti-Semitic for hating an organization condemned by every international body as deeply terroristic?

Please don't waste my time. You are without question the worst debater on WP I have ever argued with, and I am not going to waste my time engaging in another round of argument with the guy who spent 4 pages unable to refute a simple argument without resorting to name calling and attacks. From now on whenever I debate or enlighten people on WP I make sure they're people who actually have the intellectual capacity of someone above age 5, which you clearly lack.


When you smear an organization set up to defend the Jewish people in the face of a genocide as a terrorist organization, people are going to rightly call you Anti-Semitic and they are going to ignore your propaganda.

Question for you:

Without the IDF, would there be any Jews left today in the Middle East which was nearly the case in the early part of the previous century?


What did I say that was propaganda? Literally every single statement I made can be verified by checking the ICC records on Israel, UN records on Israel condemning it for its human rights violations in the West Bank and Gaza, and even reading what former IDF soldiers like Yanaton Shapiro have to say about the IDF:

https://www.wrmea.org/005-april/special ... senik.html

Where was the propaganda in stating facts? What ever happened to "facts and logic dont care about your feelings"

And also, are you not forgetting that since the beginning of the Palestine-Israel conflict almost all of the aggression and genocides that happened in this conflict came from Israel towards the Arabs and not the other way around, so how can you seriously try to unironically aver that the IDF is there to protect against genocide when the lion's share of the genocide so far has come from IDF??

The IDF themselves admitted that in Gaza they were told to shoot ALL targets regardless of if they were civilian or combatant, which is literally the textbook definition of genocide:

https://www.thenation.com/article/archi ... -gaza-war/

Actual Israeli historians have written books literally documenting and substantiating actual genocides against the Palestinian peoples by going to this historical Israeli archives from 1948 and detailing overt admissions and statements from Israeli war criminals gleefully admitting to genocide:

https://www.amazon.com/Ethnic-Cleansing ... 1851685553

Is anything that makes Israel look bad now considered propaganda, no matter how abundant the evidence.


_________________
"One often meets his destiny on the road he takes to avoid it."

Master Oogway


Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

20 Apr 2021, 1:36 pm

It's very telling that you refuse to address my question and continue with the propaganda.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,466
Location: Right over your left shoulder

20 Apr 2021, 3:12 pm

Daddy63 wrote:
The civil rights era is still with us and that's the point. Segregation throughout our society is still there and is still supported by those who continue to call themselves progressives. Our president is one of those segregationists and progressives. You can't run from that reality simply because it destroys your worldview.


He's a liberal who's supported racist policies in the past and would prefer to not be held accountable for it. I won't argue that.

How does that impact my worldview though? He's still less terrible than Donald Trump because he doesn't openly court racists for their support now. Being less terrible doesn't make him good it just makes him better. Being able to point out that some conservative Democrats also supported New Deal policies doesn't make them somehow a problem for socialists. I'd prefer anyone with ties to so called Blue Dog democrats to not run for election or otherwise be significantly involved in the party. It doesn't mean I'd start pretending the Klan isn't entirely filled with Republicans these days.

It's telling how you conveniently ignore reality whenever it conflicts with your argument.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

20 Apr 2021, 3:46 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
The civil rights era is still with us and that's the point. Segregation throughout our society is still there and is still supported by those who continue to call themselves progressives. Our president is one of those segregationists and progressives. You can't run from that reality simply because it destroys your worldview.


He's a liberal who's supported racist policies in the past and would prefer to not be held accountable for it. I won't argue that.

How does that impact my worldview though? He's still less terrible than Donald Trump because he doesn't openly court racists for their support now. Being less terrible doesn't make him good it just makes him better. Being able to point out that some conservative Democrats also supported New Deal policies doesn't make them somehow a problem for socialists. I'd prefer anyone with ties to so called Blue Dog democrats to not run for electioy n or otherwise be significantly involved in the party. It doesn't mean I'd start pretending the Klan isn't entirely filled with Republicans these days.

It's telling how you conveniently ignore reality whenever it conflicts with your argument.


Biden supports racist policies today that deny African American families with kids in failing, violent schools opportunities to put their kids in better schools. Trump ended prison terms for thousands of African Americans that were targeted and put in prison with long sentences because of legislation from Biden and his long time segregationist buddy Strom Thurmond.

How many Klansmen exactly have you spoken to and determined they are not progressives? Andrew Jackson was a progressive. David Duke is a progressive. LBJ was a progressive. Robert Byrd was a progressive. Joe Biden is a progressive. I can go on and on.

And I see that now progressive really means conservative when you want it to. Back to the mental gymnastics.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,466
Location: Right over your left shoulder

20 Apr 2021, 3:51 pm

Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
The civil rights era is still with us and that's the point. Segregation throughout our society is still there and is still supported by those who continue to call themselves progressives. Our president is one of those segregationists and progressives. You can't run from that reality simply because it destroys your worldview.


He's a liberal who's supported racist policies in the past and would prefer to not be held accountable for it. I won't argue that.

How does that impact my worldview though? He's still less terrible than Donald Trump because he doesn't openly court racists for their support now. Being less terrible doesn't make him good it just makes him better. Being able to point out that some conservative Democrats also supported New Deal policies doesn't make them somehow a problem for socialists. I'd prefer anyone with ties to so called Blue Dog democrats to not run for electioy n or otherwise be significantly involved in the party. It doesn't mean I'd start pretending the Klan isn't entirely filled with Republicans these days.

It's telling how you conveniently ignore reality whenever it conflicts with your argument.


Biden supports racist policies today that deny African American families with kids in failing, violent schools opportunities to put their kids in better schools. Trump ended prison terms for thousands of African Americans that were targeted and put in prison with long sentences because of legislation from Biden and his long time segregationist buddy Strom Thurmond.

How many Klansmen exactly have you spoken to and determined they are not progressives? Andrew Jackson was a progressive. David Duke is a progressive. LBJ was a progressive. Robert Byrd was a progressive. Joe Biden is a progressive. I can go on and on.

And I see that now progressive really means conservative when you want it to. Back to the mental gymnastics.


David Duke is a conservative Republican, and with that you've lost all credibility.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,284

20 Apr 2021, 4:29 pm

Daddy63 wrote:
The progressives in American are still the racists and segregationist today..


:roll:



Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

20 Apr 2021, 9:10 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
The civil rights era is still with us and that's the point. Segregation throughout our society is still there and is still supported by those who continue to call themselves progressives. Our president is one of those segregationists and progressives. You can't run from that reality simply because it destroys your worldview.


He's a liberal who's supported racist policies in the past and would prefer to not be held accountable for it. I won't argue that.

How does that impact my worldview though? He's still less terrible than Donald Trump because he doesn't openly court racists for their support now. Being less terrible doesn't make him good it just makes him better. Being able to point out that some conservative Democrats also supported New Deal policies doesn't make them somehow a problem for socialists. I'd prefer anyone with ties to so called Blue Dog democrats to not run for electioy n or otherwise be significantly involved in the party. It doesn't mean I'd start pretending the Klan isn't entirely filled with Republicans these days.

It's telling how you conveniently ignore reality whenever it conflicts with your argument.


Biden supports racist policies today that deny African American families with kids in failing, violent schools opportunities to put their kids in better schools. Trump ended prison terms for thousands of African Americans that were targeted and put in prison with long sentences because of legislation from Biden and his long time segregationist buddy Strom Thurmond.

How many Klansmen exactly have you spoken to and determined they are not progressives? Andrew Jackson was a progressive. David Duke is a progressive. LBJ was a progressive. Robert Byrd was a progressive. Joe Biden is a progressive. I can go on and on.

And I see that now progressive really means conservative when you want it to. Back to the mental gymnastics.


David Duke is a conservative Republican, and with that you've lost all credibility.


Better read up on David Duke. I grew up in the 1970's. You've lost all credibility.

Tell me exactly how a man who was the head of the KKK became a Democrat in the late 1960's after the supposed party switch and ran for many different political offices including the Presidential nomination as a Democrat?



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,466
Location: Right over your left shoulder

20 Apr 2021, 9:14 pm

Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
David Duke is a conservative Republican, and with that you've lost all credibility.


Better read up on David Duke. I grew up in the 1970's. You've lost all credibility.

Tell me exactly how a man who was the head of the KKK became a Democrat in the late 1960's after the supposed party switch and ran for many different political offices including the Presidential nomination as a Democrat?


Just to be clear you mean this guy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke

He's ran for governor of Louisiana as a Republican, he's ran for president as a Republican. He's ran for Senate as a Republican and he's ran for a House seat as a Republican. He's endorsed Donald Trump and self-identifies with the alt-right.

That's the guy you're trying to pretend is a progressive?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Shenanigans. There's no way you're serious. :clown:


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

20 Apr 2021, 9:20 pm

cyberdad wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
The progressives in American are still the racists and segregationist today..


:roll:


Our schools and communities remain segregated because of the progressives who continue to block bussing and expanded school options for the African American community. It's simply fact.

Name one progressive who supports desegregation and allowing African American students in totally segregated school districts options to go to better schools outside their segregated schools. Just give me one.



Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

20 Apr 2021, 9:25 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
David Duke is a conservative Republican, and with that you've lost all credibility.


Better read up on David Duke. I grew up in the 1970's. You've lost all credibility.

Tell me exactly how a man who was the head of the KKK became a Democrat in the late 1960's after the supposed party switch and ran for many different political offices including the Presidential nomination as a Democrat?


Just to be clear you mean this guy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke

He's ran for governor of Louisiana as a Republican, he's ran for president as a Republican. He's ran for Senate as a Republican and he's ran for a House seat as a Republican. He's endorsed Donald Trump and self-identifies with the alt-right.

That's the guy you're trying to pretend is a progressive?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Shenanigans. There's no way you're serious. :clown:


I pretend nothing. Tell the whole story and stop cherry-picking only things that align with your worldview.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duk ... l_campaign



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,466
Location: Right over your left shoulder

20 Apr 2021, 9:33 pm

Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
David Duke is a conservative Republican, and with that you've lost all credibility.


Better read up on David Duke. I grew up in the 1970's. You've lost all credibility.

Tell me exactly how a man who was the head of the KKK became a Democrat in the late 1960's after the supposed party switch and ran for many different political offices including the Presidential nomination as a Democrat?


Just to be clear you mean this guy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke

He's ran for governor of Louisiana as a Republican, he's ran for president as a Republican. He's ran for Senate as a Republican and he's ran for a House seat as a Republican. He's endorsed Donald Trump and self-identifies with the alt-right.

That's the guy you're trying to pretend is a progressive?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Shenanigans. There's no way you're serious. :clown:


I pretend nothing. Tell the whole story and stop cherry-picking only things that align with your worldview.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duk ... l_campaign


It's not cherry picking to prioritize the past 30 years instead of stuff that happened before I started kindergarten.

He's actually a perfect case-study in southern racists switching parties so I'm surprised you brought him up.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

20 Apr 2021, 9:56 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
David Duke is a conservative Republican, and with that you've lost all credibility.


Better read up on David Duke. I grew up in the 1970's. You've lost all credibility.

Tell me exactly how a man who was the head of the KKK became a Democrat in the late 1960's after the supposed party switch and ran for many different political offices including the Presidential nomination as a Democrat?


Just to be clear you mean this guy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke

He's ran for governor of Louisiana as a Republican, he's ran for president as a Republican. He's ran for Senate as a Republican and he's ran for a House seat as a Republican. He's endorsed Donald Trump and self-identifies with the alt-right.

That's the guy you're trying to pretend is a progressive?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Shenanigans. There's no way you're serious. :clown:


I pretend nothing. Tell the whole story and stop cherry-picking only things that align with your worldview.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duk ... l_campaign


It's not cherry picking to prioritize the past 30 years instead of stuff that happened before I started kindergarten.

He's actually a perfect case-study in southern racists switching parties so I'm surprised you brought him up.


When exactly did he switch? He was a Democrat for most of my youth in the 1970's and 1980's and then he bounced around from the populist party and then the reform party. He became a Republican for a few years to run for a state congressional seat in Louisiana in about 1990 and then went back to the reform party in the Ross Perot days. Trump supported Perot but famously left the reform party because they accepted Duke. I think it's just in the past few years that he says he is a Republican. I'm surprised you don't know the truth about David Duke.

I'm not afraid of facts. That's why I bring up David Duke.

When did Al Gore Sr switch? What about Robert Byrd or George Wallace? What about John Stennis or Herman Talmadge? Joe Eastland? William Fulbright? And what about Joe Biden? There were hundreds of progressive Democrats in the House and Senate in the 1960's and 1970's who were racists just like Duke. If the great switch is not propaganda, you ought to easily be able to come up with 10 out of the hundreds that switched. Let's have it.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,466
Location: Right over your left shoulder

20 Apr 2021, 10:15 pm

Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Daddy63 wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
David Duke is a conservative Republican, and with that you've lost all credibility.


Better read up on David Duke. I grew up in the 1970's. You've lost all credibility.

Tell me exactly how a man who was the head of the KKK became a Democrat in the late 1960's after the supposed party switch and ran for many different political offices including the Presidential nomination as a Democrat?


Just to be clear you mean this guy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke

He's ran for governor of Louisiana as a Republican, he's ran for president as a Republican. He's ran for Senate as a Republican and he's ran for a House seat as a Republican. He's endorsed Donald Trump and self-identifies with the alt-right.

That's the guy you're trying to pretend is a progressive?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Shenanigans. There's no way you're serious. :clown:


I pretend nothing. Tell the whole story and stop cherry-picking only things that align with your worldview.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duk ... l_campaign


It's not cherry picking to prioritize the past 30 years instead of stuff that happened before I started kindergarten.

He's actually a perfect case-study in southern racists switching parties so I'm surprised you brought him up.


When exactly did he switch? He was a Democrat for most of my youth in the 1970's and 1980's and then he bounced around from the populist party and then the reform party. He became a Republican for a few years to run for a state congressional seat in Louisiana in about 1990 and then went back to the reform party in the Ross Perot days. Trump supported Perot but famously left the reform party because they accepted Duke. I think it's just in the past few years that he says he is a Republican. I'm surprised you don't know the truth about David Duke.

I'm not afraid of facts. That's why I bring up David Duke.

When did Al Gore Sr switch? What about Robert Byrd or George Wallace? What about John Stennis or Herman Talmadge? Joe Eastland? William Fulbright? And what about Joe Biden? There were hundreds of progressive Democrats in the House and Senate in the 1960's and 1970's who were racists just like Duke. If the great switch is not propaganda, you ought to easily be able to come up with 10 out of the hundreds that switched. Let's have it.


I'm not sure there's many good examples of individual politicians and I'm really not going to bother to research it.

If you look at voting patterns the same populist voters in the south shifted from identifying as Democrats to Republicans. David Duke makes a good example of this because he's not a progressive or a Democrat first and foremost, he's a white nationalist and southern populist. Some southern Democrats were cut from the same cloth, others just knew they needed to win those votes. Both are abhorrent but how does that have anything to do with AOC or the other Democrats I do endorse? I don't support Biden or other centrist Democrats so why should I defend them?

Does Stacy Abrams owe an apology because racist populist southerners were part of the party when she was in grade school?

Your argument boils down to trying to blame progressives now for how the party was 50 years ago meanwhile you endorse people who openly court the same white nationalists you use to smear progressives with.

Republicans figured out how to leverage the resentment of those racists to get them to turn against the same New Deal programs they both enjoyed and benefited from. That's evidence of what motivates them and what they prioritize, those people were never progressives.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


Daddy63
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 551

20 Apr 2021, 10:52 pm

funeralxempire wrote:

I'm not sure there's many good examples of individual politicians and I'm really not going to bother to research it.

If you look at voting patterns the same populist voters in the south shifted from identifying as Democrats to Republicans. David Duke makes a good example of this because he's not a progressive or a Democrat first and foremost, he's a white nationalist and southern populist. Some southern Democrats were cut from the same cloth, others just knew they needed to win those votes. Both are abhorrent but how does that have anything to do with AOC or the other Democrats I do endorse? I don't support Biden or other centrist Democrats so why should I defend them?

Does Stacy Abrams owe an apology because racist populist southerners were part of the party when she was in grade school?

Your argument boils down to trying to blame progressives now for how the party was 50 years ago meanwhile you endorse people who openly court the same white nationalists you use to smear progressives with.

Republicans figured out how to leverage the resentment of those racists to get them to turn against the same New Deal programs they both enjoyed and benefited from. That's evidence of what motivates them and what they prioritize, those people were never progressives.


With a very few notable exceptions, there are no racist democrats from the house and senate in the 1960's and 1970's who switched. Those progressive bigots died as Democrats. It's fact.

David Duke makes a perfect example because he was for decades a Democrat. He briefly became a Republican in about 1990 to opportunistically run for a state senate seat and immediately left the party afterwards.

Progressive Democrats up until 2016 were largely anti-immigrant compared to Republicans. They were the party of union workers and farmers and wanted to protect those jobs from migrants and push wages higher. They always claimed Republicans wanted cheap labor from open immigration to fuel economic growth by driving labor costs lower. Trump himself switched that around himself and the Republican party became the party of workers and farmers. It's why he won in 2016. Immigration and border security is why David Duke became a Republican at that same time.

To me, anti-immigration is still a progressive stance to protect workers.

Here's some facts from the Obama era:

https://www.cato.org/publications/comme ... mmigration

It's not just Southern Democrats who were and are racists. Again, let's not leave out the bigots like Keith Ellison, Robert Byrd, and Joe Biden who weren't and aren't even from the South. Let's also agree that segregation is modern day racism and the all Democrats today continue to embrace the forced segregation of our schools.

Is segregation also a progressive value? Is the 'separate but equal' doctrine going back to the 1890's and enforced today by denying African Americans school choices progressive? It seems impossible to say it's not.

If Stacey Abrams and other progressives owe an apology to someone it should be to African American families who are forced to send their children to segregated schools where almost no child is proficient in basic math and reading. That's not just the Democratic Party of 50 years ago. It's also the same party today and it's still a travesty.