Can atheism produce a viable and flourishing society
Everybody talks rubbish from time to time. I can see how that instance of it would be a put-off, but I think it's important not to throw out the baby with the bath water. A person saying one silly thing doesn't invalidate everything they say.
It's an interesting notion though. I've long thought that there's a limit to how far the idea of ableism as a thing in need of eradication can be taken. Mostly I see it as harmful, but taken to its logical conclusion we would have to radically alter all these exams and other aspects of life that require people not to be stupid in order to pass or to receive the goodies. Logically, society has massive built-in discrimination against idiots. Stupid people can't help being stupid.
it's long been the dream of a friend of mine to sue the German government into providing tax-documents etc. in simple German - like Wikipedia in simple English.
His idea is that any attempt at explaining all the nooks and crannies of German tax law in plain language would be more difficult than throwing the whole system out and replacing it with one that actually already starts out in simple and plain language.
but the language towards mentally impaired people actually has already massively improved - I remember my biology teacher in high school still speaking of certain gene defects leading to imbecility or idiocy - terms no longer used for the mentally impaired but purely to describe incidental mental underperformance, and not general impairment.
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.
There's an actual issue there as the terms inevitably seep out into the non-medical or non-academic world and lose their specific meaning or become generic pejoratives through casual use, causing a new set of terms to be developed, and then the cycle repeats. "ret*d" is the arch example, it originally came into use to replace outmoded words like imbecile or idiot, but became co-opted as an insult, and has now been replaced and is often treated as a slur, despite having had a specific medical meaning at one point. You'll even see the phenomenon at work in political euphemisms, black neighborhoods being described as urban, and then vibrant, for example, where now it's not common to see those terms used pejoratively in various corners of the internet.
_________________
“The totally convinced and the totally stupid have too much in common for the resemblance to be accidental.”
-- Robert Anton Wilson
Everybody talks rubbish from time to time. I can see how that instance of it would be a put-off, but I think it's important not to throw out the baby with the bath water. A person saying one silly thing doesn't invalidate everything they say.
I agree, generally speaking. It wasn't just the one thing with Shives -- he was leaning into that ideology in general. Other athiest YouTubers who had collaborated with him in the past also commented on his shift.
Though I do disagree with the conclusion he reached, it was more about how he got there. The show was "5 Stupid Things," not "5 Stupid People." Prior to the change, the idea was more in line with what you said, "Everybody talks rubbish" -- there are at least 5 stupid things about everyone and everything. Shives did "5 Stupid Things" episodes about atheism, himself and the "5 Stupid Things" show. That seemed pretty even-handed to me.
Furthermore, Shives ended every episode of his apologist critique show with: "Agree, disagree, tell me what I got right, tell me what I got wrong" -- inviting anyone to post an opinion. I respected that. That's what I felt like went out the window with the idea that questioning his friends' opinion was inappropriate.
Reading this post, I feel like you put thought into it. There's a huge difference between that and the authority-based religious-type thinking that Shives used to arrive at his.
The word in question, by itself, is just an antonym for "smart." And if we can't have an antonym for smart, that seems double plus ungood to me.
Rexi
Veteran
Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."
Rexi
Veteran
Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."
Newb economical states think it's necessary to have belief in God in order to be moral
High payment countries believe you dont need belief in God to be moral
Higher education linked to belief God is not necessary
Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/07/20/the-global-god-divide/
_________________
My Pepe Le Skunk. I have so much faith in our love for one another. Thanks for being an amazing partner. x
Any topic, PM me; mind my profile.
Rexi
Veteran
Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."
Now that thats cleared up, atheists are also more knowledgeable about religion.
Survey: Atheists, Agnostics Know More About Religion Than Religious
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2010/09/28/130191248/atheists-and-agnostics-know-more-about-bible-than-religious?t=1628947905847
_________________
My Pepe Le Skunk. I have so much faith in our love for one another. Thanks for being an amazing partner. x
Any topic, PM me; mind my profile.
Rexi
Veteran
Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."
Survey: Atheists, Agnostics Know More About Religion Than Religious
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2010/09/28/130191248/atheists-and-agnostics-know-more-about-bible-than-religious?t=1628947905847
Yes, I always thought that it was important to give religion a fair hearing before deciding what to do with it.
Only once has a society put atheism at the front of society.
Albania, between 1967-1990, under the communist rule of Enver Hoxha, completely banned religion in accordance with a very rigid form of communism. This was, to date, the only officially atheist state (as opposed to a secular one). Human rights violations were very frequent (2/3 of Albanians were interrogated by the secret police), and the religion ban was part of an attempt to copy Mao's Cultural Revolution in China.
That said, I certainly welcome atheists (as well as people of faith) to play a role in advancing a secular, democratic society.
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
Now proficient in ChatGPT!
1. I'd like to just give you a +1 for this whole post, very well put.
Redd_Kross is one of the least offensive progressives I have met.
Yes, I am a black belt in "The Back-handed Compliment".
Jaredthefox92
Hummingbird
Joined: 14 Aug 2021
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 23
Location: Somewhere in rural Georgia
I'm a Christian, but I believe in the separation from church and state. Simply put, being atheist doesn't make you a bad person, (even though I have had some bad run ins with bad atheist), but to say that "would we be better" isn't a way to look at it. People have done bad things regardless of beliefs, but good people have done good things while having or not having beliefs.
I will say some things:
1.No, not all wars were fought over religion, in fact a lot of them weren't and the ones that were had political, economic, and territorial motives.
2.Not all atheist people are bad, but people who think they can excuse their bad behavior due to nihilism are bad.
True dat.
Unfortunately, so many people don't get this, or choose not to get it, because of their conceptually hyperpartisan views.
Many people can't handle cognitive dissonance.
Many people embrace confirmation bias.
It makes things simpler for them.
That is why it is amusing when people dismiss an article entirely simply because they dislike the source.
Even Churchill had something worthwhile to say, from time to time.
My skunk grand pappy used to say: "Life is simple for simple people."
Survey: Atheists, Agnostics Know More About Religion Than Religious
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2010/09/28/130191248/atheists-and-agnostics-know-more-about-bible-than-religious?t=1628947905847
Yes, I always thought that it was important to give religion a fair hearing before deciding what to do with it.
Religion has a place, but it depends on a person's priorities.
E.G.
Is social/personal-harmony/groupthink more important than the Truth?
Since I am "The Oracle of Truth", I embrace the latter.
It is a hard road to tread, but I am a tough skunk.
Rexi
Veteran
Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."
Albania, between 1967-1990, under the communist rule of Enver Hoxha, completely banned religion in accordance with a very rigid form of communism. This was, to date, the only officially atheist state (as opposed to a secular one). Human rights violations were very frequent (2/3 of Albanians were interrogated by the secret police), and the religion ban was part of an attempt to copy Mao's Cultural Revolution in China.
That said, I certainly welcome atheists (as well as people of faith) to play a role in advancing a secular, democratic society.
People in those countries aren't true atheists, just the leaders imposing.
Society was unaware about the atheism they were gonna be forced into.
I think if the society wills for such an act instead of majorly elected very religious leaders, results will be much different.
Theocracy can be very detrimental to society as can communism.
But nowadays people lose their jobs for being atheists, being an atheist leader of a country doesnt sound like itll happen anytime soon. Society isn't ready to grow to that point, there is still major discrimination and unfounded mistrust and propaganda against us.
_________________
My Pepe Le Skunk. I have so much faith in our love for one another. Thanks for being an amazing partner. x
Any topic, PM me; mind my profile.
Things aren't quite that bad:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_a ... cs_and_law
Rexi
Veteran
Joined: 3 Sep 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,388
Location: "I know there's nothing we can do. But my heart can't accept it." "If this is real, then I want to change the future."
When people say atheism is the belief in "nothing" that is inaccurate. There was always something. I don't associate myself with the belief of nothing as I imagine most atheists don't either. There's not nothing out there. There was always something, such as perhaps matter, whether it was compressed or not, the start of the big bang.
The lack of something, gives you something else. It's a trade, perhaps sort of like the alchemy laws, in order to trade or create something, you need to add something first. You can't use nothing to create. You don't believe in nothing through your rejection of some belief, you don't lack belief. It is not absence of belief, it is the presence of a different belief in a variety of them. Your personal affiliation to a certain belief doesn't constitute "the" belief, singularity, or truth. There are many beliefs, and because someone doesn't abide by yours, they are not absent. They are present, much like you are. You can choose to believe they are absent, but that's like the world spins around you and you are the only truth, which tends to happen, people think their religion is the right one, whether they are Islamists, Catholics, Adventists, Buddhists, etc. And there is no life and belief beyond their "true" religion. Could it be everyone is wrong?
_________________
My Pepe Le Skunk. I have so much faith in our love for one another. Thanks for being an amazing partner. x
Any topic, PM me; mind my profile.
Last edited by Rexi on 19 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm, edited 3 times in total.