Censorship then/now ‘Girls on Film’ turns 40

Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,415
Location: Long Island, New York

15 Aug 2021, 5:24 am

Duran Duran’s banned 'Girls on Film' video still shocks, 40 years later: 'I don't honestly think it would get made today,' says director

Quote:
When Duran Duran and directors Kevin Godley and Lol Creme convened at Surrey, England’s Shepperton Studios 40 years ago, on Aug. 13, 1981, a new American cable network called MTV — which would soon become hugely instrumental in the young New Romantic band’s career — was only 12 days old. So, no one had any censorship concerns when making the music video for Duran Duran’s new U.K. top five hit, “Girls on Film.”

“Initially it was made for nightclubs, where there was no limitation of what you could or couldn't show,” Godley tells Yahoo Entertainment, explaining that the band’s managers at the time, Paul and Michael Berrow, merely instructed them, “‘Make us something that's erotic.’ The only guide we'd been given was to come up with something erotic, and perhaps a little bit controversial, that could be played in clubs.

“The fact that MTV came into existence shortly after that kind of muddied the waters a bit,” Godley adds with a chuckle

Suffice to say, Godley & Creme’s original softcore-porn concept for the uncensored, six-minute Night Version of “Girls on Film” wasn’t going to pass muster with any network’s censors, other than maybe Skinemax; it was quickly banned by the BBC in the group’s native Britain, and the version that MTV eventually aired was drastically different. As Duran Duran performed next to a fashion runway that led up to a boxing ring, two video vixens wearing see-through lingerie (or in some cases, much less) mud-wrestled, Sumo-wrestled, engaged in a pillow fight while straddling a shaving cream-slathered pole, received mouth-to-mouth from a virile lifeguard, and rubbed champagne-bucket ice cubes on their bare nipples — among other “various erotic situations that we might be able to shoot in a way that would be titillating,” Godley says.

And of course, Duran Duran knew exactly what they were doing from the start, and the subsequent uproar had exactly the desired effect. “I know the band were quite pleased about [the video being banned], because looking back, part of the reason it was done in the first place was to try and break America,” says Godley. “It helped them, as opposed to hindering them.”

Godley explains that the risqué video was “much about the band trying to bring that European visual perspective to America,” and the images that he and Creme came up with were certainly intercontinental.

In a cheeky deleted scene from a little-seen, slightly different version of the original “Girls on Film” video, the Duran band members held up a sign that read, “SOME PEOPLE WILL DO ANYTHING TO SELL RECORDS,” proving that they were very much in on the joke. But much of the irony and subtext of the video was lost on viewers. “The original idea, I guess, was an ironic take on exploitation, because that's what the song was about,” Godley explains. “We were trying to stay true, in our own way, to what the song was about and be ironic about it. But particularly in America, irony isn't a hugely popular thing, so maybe it just went over people's heads and all they saw was naked women. I think it was originally conceived to be a little bit more intelligent than it is.”

Godley is quick to say that he never thought “Girls on Film” was exploitative, stressing that the highly “professional” models “were totally up for it” and “didn't mind showing their bodies,” and that “even when they were showing their bodies off, there was a sense that they were doing it with some power and that it was intentional.” Also, when discussing the video’s optics that have aged most poorly — a scene featuring a white, blonde model in a fetish cowgirl costume riding a G-stringed Black man dressed as a horse — he insists that the Black dancer was merely the best candidate of several men who auditioned for the controversial equine role.

That eyebrow-raising scene actually made it into the almost unrecognizable, PG-13 edit that Godley & Creme were forced to do for MTV once the cable network started to take off in America. But most of the other shocking scenes of course didn’t make the cut, which was frustrating for the directors.

“It just got people talking about us, I guess, as much as the band,” Godley says of “Girls on Film.”

But as scandalous as the “Girls on Film” video was way back in 1981, Godley admits, “I don't honestly think it would get made today. The system that operates today, it’s not as free and easy as it used to be. … I think everybody would possibly be too scared to do it, because they may get torn apart on social media. Because even though it's not that racy, it would be deemed inappropriate, I think.” He theorizes that if he were directing “Girls on Film” in 2021, “It would be more about the things that you didn't see — suggested, rather than being overt. But even then, I don’t think we’d get away with it.

“Let's face it, it was emblematic of the time, more than anything else.”


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

It is Autism Acceptance Month

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Mr Reynholm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2019
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,363
Location: Tulsa, OK

18 Aug 2021, 8:01 am

After seeing this post I went to Youtube to rematch the video. I hadn't seen it in 20+ years so I couldn't remember it much.
Its pretty tame. Yeah people get the meaning, but look at some of the current music videos such as Cardi B's WAP. Why no outrage over that?