Page 4 of 4 [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,577
Location: Seattle-ish

05 Sep 2021, 12:44 am

DW_a_mom wrote:
Biden was constrained by the negotiated timing of the Trump deal.


I don't find this to be a particularly convincing point, incoming presidents often renegotiate or even violate treaties made by the previous administrations, and it's not like the Taliban was some sort of valuable ally who we needed to keep our exact word to. Joe Biden has also been on the record since at least 2011 about wanting to get out quickly, so it's not as if this came out of the blue, though apparently even our actual allies were shocked by how it was carried out, to judge from the British response.


_________________
“The totally convinced and the totally stupid have too much in common for the resemblance to be accidental.”
-- Robert Anton Wilson


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

05 Sep 2021, 2:01 am

Dox47 wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Biden was constrained by the negotiated timing of the Trump deal.


I don't find this to be a particularly convincing point, incoming presidents often renegotiate or even violate treaties made by the previous administrations, and it's not like the Taliban was some sort of valuable ally who we needed to keep our exact word to. Joe Biden has also been on the record since at least 2011 about wanting to get out quickly, so it's not as if this came out of the blue, though apparently even our actual allies were shocked by how it was carried out, to judge from the British response.


It was a stuff up.
Most Amerians think so.
Most of the world thinks so.

Time to move on. 8)



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

05 Sep 2021, 3:06 am

Pepe wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Pepe wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
I don’t like to spend time saying “but Trump.” But it isn’t appropriate to ignore the constraints put on Biden by a treaty negotiated by the Trump administration. We cannot, as a country, regularly ignore treaties negotiated by prior administrations without huge costs to our ability to act on an international stage. We have to stand by our word, even when we don’t like it.


My understanding was that *neither* party wanted to stay in Afghanistan.
If I am correct, why are you pushing this fact to one side? 8O

Biden wasn't pushed.
He jumped at the chance. 8)


I know Biden was eager to get out, but it isn't as simple as wanting to get out. If it was, no one would care how well it was handled.

Biden was constrained by the negotiated timing of the Trump deal. And the fact that the negotiated agreement left no incentive for the Taliban to play nice with the Afghan government at the time. Even, so Biden did get an extension of 3 months, which hopefully helped. What the perfect timing would have been we will never know.

I think people are just upset, even if they agreed we had to get out. There is no pretty way to take such a step, especially knowing what life is like with the Taliban, and it's hard to watch.


But you do accept some ways are better than others, right?

As people keep on saying, it wasn't getting out of Afghanistan that was the problem, here.
It was the way it was implemented. 8)


I am not in a position to say if there was a better way. I don't think most people are. What most people know is that they don't like the way it happened, and neither do I. If there was a better way that could have and should have been used, the postmortem analysis will show it. Whether or not you or I will ever be privy to the results is an open question.

I understand one large potential issue to be the order in which they choose to close bases, but that was a main recommendation from the military advisors. Not sure what else was Biden v. Pentagon.

I'll read what comes out when it comes out; I haven't seen that much yet.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

05 Sep 2021, 3:14 am

Dox47 wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Biden was constrained by the negotiated timing of the Trump deal.


I don't find this to be a particularly convincing point, incoming presidents often renegotiate or even violate treaties made by the previous administrations, and it's not like the Taliban was some sort of valuable ally who we needed to keep our exact word to. Joe Biden has also been on the record since at least 2011 about wanting to get out quickly, so it's not as if this came out of the blue, though apparently even our actual allies were shocked by how it was carried out, to judge from the British response.


I come from the school that says a country has to stick by its word. Doing otherwise degrades our standing on the world stage no matter how unimportant the other side of the negotiation is. We've relied on the spilled blood from soldiers of smaller, local allies in all the wars of recent decades; we do have to be careful what messages we send.

I think Biden was coming into a world that was already highly distrustful of America's word, given all that Trump violated, and was determined to change that pattern. What his primary reasoning was I don't think we can know. While he wanted to get out quickly, I also don't think we know what his choice of precise timing would have been.

I guess we're at a draw.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).