AnonymousAnonymous wrote:
Will someone explain why Hollyweird won't accept anything original to produce?
there have been about 7 iterations of "Django" before Tarantino made his version.
okay, it's his thing, and he actually had a cameo in iteration number six - but there were 5 iterations of Django in which Tarantino wasn't involved.
Hollywood has been remaking stuff for a century now.
And the Lion King, the 90s animayed Version, was a ripoff of a japanese manga/anime, yet somehow, at Disney, it was referred to as 'Bambi in the jungle' - which, essentially, it is.
But that's not really the problem, Bambi and the Lion King tell largely a similar story, a grand narrative of growing up, for children and their parents.
It's obvious you can't tell the same story forever, and others have figured put how to tell that story, too, so what is the world's largest media company to do?
tell a totally unnecessary story and milk that dead horse, or rather, parents' wallets, before the kids grow older and spend their life on instagram and tiktok, where Disney can't reach them.
Disney knows the days of movies are numbered, and that money today isn't in the media content, but in access to media content, like the Disneyplus platform.
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.