Mysterious jump in excess mortality among younger cohorts

Page 5 of 15 [ 239 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

12 Jan 2022, 9:57 am

Yep. Too many people get heart inflammation from the COVID vaccine. And that must be addressed.

But the benefits of receiving the vaccine still far outweigh the risks of getting unvaccinated COVID.



that1weirdgrrrl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2017
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,090
Location: Between my dreams and your fantasies

12 Jan 2022, 4:09 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
If flu shots don’t “tire people out,” why should it not be the same for the COVID shots?


Because flu shots are given approximately every 12 months, whereas covid shots are being given every 2-6 months currently (depending on the region).

The main takeaway from that article was a suggestion to consider an annual vaccination program, much like the flu shot.

Quote:
countries should leave more time between booster programs and tie them to the onset of the cold season in each hemisphere, following the blueprint set out by influenza vaccination strategies


I think this a good suggestion.


_________________
...what do the public, the great unobservant public, who could hardly tell a weaver by his tooth or a compositor by his left thumb, care about the finer shades of analysis and deduction!


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

12 Jan 2022, 5:11 pm

COVID is very much a year-round disease; whereas the flu is more seasonal.



Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

13 Jan 2022, 4:17 pm

This is ... not really my area but for any interested parties:

Early on there were many reports of the shots affecting women in a particular way. Women who complained were unfortunately lumped in with the folks yelling that this was a sterilisation shot, rather than a vaccine. There is some vindication here at least, but no sign yet that the vaccine affects fertility (a signal like that may take some time to appear). Lets hope said sterilisation/depopulation doomsayers don't turn out to be correct about that too.

https://www.dw.com/en/opinion-after-cov ... a-60406613

Soon after the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, stories began to emerge that some people were experiencing changes to their menstrual cycles after getting vaccinated.

For a long time, this did not get much media attention, and numerous medical experts continued to assure the public that the COVID-19 vaccines did not cause these side effects. Such stories remained confined to conversations, internet forums and social media.


...

Now, a first-of-its-kind, women-led, peer-reviewed study has confirmed the experience of people who menstruate around the world: COVID-19 vaccines can affect periods.

With a dataset of almost 4,000 women, both vaccinated and not, using a menstrual cycle-tracking app, researchers found a clinically significant shift in the cycles of newly vaccinated individuals, lasting nearly one day longer on average.

Cycles typically returned to normal within a month or two, which was the case with me, as well.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

13 Jan 2022, 5:39 pm

I'm still alive! :)

Also, I haven't had a period since getting my first, second, or third covid vaccine shots. (Nor ever before that, either.)


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

14 Jan 2022, 8:00 am

More suspect data, this time from Canada's Alberta Province.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/cov ... eaths-soar

A reader has pointed out an amazing dataset from the province of Alberta, Canada which reports Covid cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by day after the first and second vaccine doses.

Hospitalisations:
Image

Deaths:
Image

SOURCE: https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-a ... e-outcomes

Alberta has about 4.4 million people, so this sample is not small. The vast majority of vaccines given in the province are the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, though about 10 percent are the DNA/AAV vaccines, mostly from AstraZeneca, which is not used in the United States.

The figures further support the national-level data from Israel and Britain, which last year saw Covid deaths hit all-time highs just after they began mass vaccination campaigns.

The chart below tracks Covid deaths in the United Kingdom, which peaked in January 2021, just after Britain began vaccinating elderly people. At the time, the United Kingdom suffered about 1,200 Covid deaths per day, the highest per-capita total any big country has ever seen, the equivalent of about 6,000 daily deaths in the United States.


Image

Vaccine advocates tried to dismiss those deaths as the result of a preexisting winter Covid wave in Britain (though other European countries such as France and Spain did not faces similarly large surges).

That excuse cannot be used for Alberta. Canada’s vaccination campaign began relatively late, and nearly all of it took place after the winter 2020-2021 Covid spike. Through mid-February 2021, barely 2 percent of Alberta residents had received their first dose.

The most likely explanation for the spike was and remains that the first dose of the vaccines transiently suppresses the immune system, as Pfizer’s own clinical trial data reveal.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


that1weirdgrrrl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2017
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,090
Location: Between my dreams and your fantasies

14 Jan 2022, 12:54 pm

Quote:
vaccines transiently suppresses the immune system


This is congruent to what I saw just looking in VAERS. (If anyone wants to look, it's a public database).

There seems to be a trend of people dying of break through infection right around the 2 month mark after vaccination (roughly one to three months, I say 2 months as an average).

Does this length of immune suppression seem to occur with second/third/fourth doses?

If the covid vaccines cause immune weakness for an average of 2 months, and some regions are vaccinating people every two months, that means their immune system never gets a chance to fully recover. :?


_________________
...what do the public, the great unobservant public, who could hardly tell a weaver by his tooth or a compositor by his left thumb, care about the finer shades of analysis and deduction!


Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

14 Jan 2022, 5:19 pm

that1weirdgrrrl wrote:
Does this length of immune suppression seem to occur with second/third/fourth doses?


I am not certain, but there is a sign that it might be cumulative according to some sources in what I linked on Christmas Day.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

14 Jan 2022, 5:37 pm

The Epoch Times have published the anti-vaxxers Holy Grail of an article. The narrative, she shifts (though shifting into stupidity like "the anti-vaxxers were 'accidentally' right about this vaccine". Ahem, f**k you, narrative.)

https://www.theepochtimes.com/sars-cov- ... 07235.html
https://archive.is/dmMR7

People don’t realize that these vaccines are vastly different from the many childhood vaccines we are now used to getting early in life. I find it shocking that the vaccine developers and the government officials across the globe are wrecklessly pushing these vaccines on an unsuspecting population. Together with Dr. Greg Nigh, I recently published a peer-reviewed paper on the technology behind the mRNA vaccines and the many potentially unknown consequences to health . Such unprecedented vaccines normally take twelve years to develop, with only a 2% success rate, but these vaccines were developed and brought to market in less than a year. As a consequence, we have no direct knowledge of any effects that the vaccines might have on our health over the long term. However, knowledge about how these vaccines work, how the immune system works and how neurodegenerative diseases come about can be brought to bear on the problem in order to predict potential devastating future consequences of the vaccines.

...

Our paper showed that there are several mechanisms by which these vaccines could lead to severe disease, including autoimmune disease, neurodegenerative diseases, vascular disorders (hemorrhaging and blood clots) and possibly reproductive issues. There is also the risk that the vaccines will accelerate the emergence of new strains of the virus that are no longer sensitive to the antibodies produced by the vaccines. When people are immune compromised (e.g., taking chemotherapy for cancer), the antibodies they produce may not be able to keep the virus in check because the immune system is too impaired. Just as in the case of antibiotic resistance, new strains evolve within an infected immune-compromised person’s body that produce a version of the spike protein that no longer binds with the acquired antibodies. These new strains quickly come to dominate over the original strain, especially when the general population is heavily vaccinated with a vaccine that is specific to the original strain. This problem is likely going to necessitate the repeated rollout of new versions of the vaccine at periodic intervals that people will have to receive to induce yet another round of antibody production in an endless game of cat and mouse.

Like the mRNA vaccines, the DNA vaccines are based on novel biotech gene editing techniques that are brand new, so they too are a massive experiment unleashed on a huge unsuspecting population, with unknown consequences. Both DNA vector vaccines have been associated with a very rare condition called thrombocytopenia, in which platelet counts drop precipitously, resulting in system-wide blood clots and a high risk of cerebral hemorrhaging [5]. This is likely due to an autoimmune reaction to the platelets, and it comes with a high risk of mortality. In the case of the AZ vaccine, this has caused over 20 European countries to temporarily pause their vaccination programs [6]. And the United States called a temporary halt on the J&J vaccine.

Even experts don’t really understand the mechanism as of now, although a fascinating theory to explain this depends on the fact that DNA vector vaccines require the DNA to be copied into RNA in the nucleus, and this presents the possibility of producing an incomplete copy, generated through “splice variants,” that is missing the code for attaching to the membrane. These soluble partial sequences wander off to other parts of the body and bind to ACE2 receptors throughout the vasculature. Antibodies to these ACE2-bound partial spike fragments cause an acute inflammatory response that results in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).


...

The Spike Protein is Toxic

The COVID-19 vaccines are all based on supplying genetic code to produce the spike protein that is the main constituent of the SARS-CoV-2 protein cage that encloses its RNA contents. Both the DNA vector and the RNA vaccines induce the vaccine-infected cell to manufacture many copies of the spike protein according to the code. Through experimentation, researchers have determined that the spike protein is toxic even when introduced all by itself. In a revealing experiment, researchers injected spike protein into hamsters, and found that it was taken up by endothelial cells lining the blood vessels, via ACE2 receptors. This caused a downregulation of ACE2, which had significant effects on the metabolic policy in the cells. In particular, it inhibited the synthesis of mitochondria, and caused the existing mitochondria to fragment. Mitochondria are the organelles in the cell that produce large quantities of ATP (the energy currency of cells) by oxidizing nutrients, while consuming oxygen and producing water and carbon dioxide. The spike protein reduced the production of ATP by mitochondria and increased glycolysis — the alternative, much less efficient, way to produce ATP without using oxygen. This metabolic change towards getting energy through glycolysis is a characteristic feature of cancer cells and of neurons in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

In another experiment, researchers showed that spike protein can cross the blood-brain barrier in mice and be taken up by neurons throughout the brain. This too is likely mediated by ACE2 receptors (which neurons also produce). These same researchers also showed that spike protein administered in the nose was able to reach the brain by traveling along the olfactory nerve. When they induced inflammation in the brain through exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), they saw an increased uptake of spike protein into the brain, which they hypothesized was caused by increased leakiness in the barrier. As you will see, these points become important when we later consider what happens following a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, which is designed to induce inflammation.

Many people suffering from COVID-19 have experienced symptoms characteristic of the central nervous system such as headache, nausea, dizziness, fatal brain blood clots and encephalitis. In an advanced 3D microfluid model of the human BBB, researchers in the United States showed that the spike protein by itself disrupts the blood brain barrier by inducing an inflammatory state, and they proposed that this could be the source of such symptoms.


...

Bell’s Palsy, Autism and Parkinson’s Disease

The mRNA vaccines appear to disrupt the body’s ability to keep latent viruses from “waking up” and causing disease symptoms. This observation is based on the fact that shingles and facial palsy (Bell’s palsy) are being commonly reported in side-effect reports in the FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. As of May 21, 2021, over 2500 reports of Bell’s palsy following COVID-19 vaccines had appeared in VAERS. A primary cause of Bell’s palsy is the activation of latent viral infections, most notably Herpes simplex and Varicella zoster, Varicella zoster is also the virus responsible for shingles.

While Bell’s palsy usually resolves over time, there can be some serious longer-term consequences. Pregnant women who are diagnosed with active herpes infections during pregnancy have a 2-fold increased risk of having an autistic male child from that pregnancy. This should make a pregnant woman hesitate to get a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Bell’s palsy can also be a risk factor for Parkinson’s disease much later in life. A study on nearly 200 Parkinson’s disease patients compared with age- and gender-matched controls found that six of the Parkinson’s patients had had an earlier diagnosis of Bell’s palsy, whereas none of the control patients had. There’s also a link between autism and Parkinson’s disease. A study on autistic adults over 39 years old found that one third of them had symptoms that meet the criteria for a Parkinson’s diagnosis.


...

Prion Diseases

...

Indeed, the coronavirus spike protein has a GxxxG motif in its transmembrane domain (specifically, GFIAG — glycine, phenylalanine, isoproline, alanine, glycine). There is a platform called “Uniprot” where you can look up the sequence of specific proteins. The Uniprot entry for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has five glycine zipper sequences altogether. According to J. Bart Classen, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has the ability “to form amyloid and toxic aggregates that can act as seeds to aggregate many of the misfolded brain proteins and can ultimately lead to neurodegeneration.”

Many neurodegenerative diseases have been linked to specific proteins that have prion-like properties, and these diseases are characterized as protein-misfolding diseases or proteopathies. Like PrP, prion-like proteins become pathogenic when their alpha helices misfold as beta sheets, and the protein is then impaired in its ability to enter the membrane. These diseases include Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Huntington’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, and each of these is associated with a particular protein that misfolds and accumulates in inclusion bodies in association with the disease. We already saw that Parkinson’s disease is characterized by Lewy bodies in the substantia nigra that accumulate misfolded α-synuclein.


...

In the paper that Greg Nigh and I published recently on the mRNA vaccines, we argued that the mRNA vaccines are rather perfectly set up to produce a very dangerous situation in the spleen that is poised to launch a prion disease. Given the fact that the DNA vector vaccines also end up concentrated in the spleen, I think that the same thing holds true for them as well. The spleen is where the action is for seeding misfolded prion proteins. The vaccine-infected cells have been programmed to produce large amounts of spike proteins. Prion proteins misfold into damaging beta-sheet oligomers when there are too many of them in the cytoplasm. Might the spike protein do the same?

...

Germinal Centers and Parkinson’s Disease

Germinal centers in the spleen are a primary factory where antibodies against specific antigens (such as the spike protein) are manufactured and perfected. Makers of the mRNA vaccines were pleased to see that antigen-presenting cells (mainly dendritic cells), originally attracted to the site of the injection, take up the mRNA particles and then migrate via the lymph system to the spleen in high numbers and induce high levels of antibody production in these germinal centers.

Unfortunately, these same germinal centers are a primary site for the initiation of a process of producing and distributing misfolded prion proteins, often seeded by viral proteins, and triggered by an acute inflammatory response.


...

Impaired Immune Response due to Over-vaccination

A characteristic of the elderly is an impaired ability to mount antibodies against new pathogenic threats, and this is reflected in a failure to generate protective antibodies in response to vaccination. It has been demonstrated in experiments with mice that aged mice have an overabundance of long-lived memory (antigen-experienced) B cells, and this is paired with an inability to generate new B cells from progenitor cells in the bone marrow, as well as impairment in the process of refinement of the antibody response in germinal centers in the spleen and the associated class switching that produces effective IgG antibodies. A significant reduction in the number of naive follicular B cells, combined with an impaired ability to convert them into mature memory B cells leaves these aged mice highly vulnerable to new infections. It is likely that the same principle applies to humans. A plausible conclusion is that aggressive vaccination campaigns accelerate the pace at which an individual’s immune system reaches an “aged” status due to exuberant generation of memory B cells in response to the artificial stimuli induced by repeated vaccination.

It has now been confirmed that the S1 component of the spike protein shows up in the blood one day after the first mRNA vaccine and remains detectable for up to a month after vaccination, becoming cleared as IgA and IgG antibodies become available. For immune compromised people, it likely stays in the blood much longer, exposing all the tissues — the spleen, the heart, the brain, the gonads, etc. – to the toxic prion-like spike protein.


...

Summary

There are many reasons to be wary of the COVID-19 vaccines, which have been rushed to market with grossly inadequate evaluation and aggressively promoted to an uninformed public, with the potential for huge, irreversible, negative consequences. One potential consequence is to exhaust the finite supply of progenitor B cells in the bone marrow early in life, causing an inability to mount new antibodies to infectious agents. An even more worrisome possibility is that these vaccines, both the mRNA vaccines and the DNA vector vaccines, may be a pathway to crippling disease sometime in the future. Through the prion-like action of the spike protein, we will likely see an alarming increase in several major neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease, CKD, ALS and Alzheimer’s, and these diseases will show up with increasing prevalence among younger and younger populations, in years to come. Unfortunately, we won’t know whether the vaccines caused this increase, because there will usually be a long time separation between the vaccination event and the disease diagnosis. Very convenient for the vaccine manufacturers, who stand to make huge profits off of our misfortunes — both from the sale of the vaccines themselves and from the large medical cost of treating all these debilitating diseases.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


MrsPeel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2017
Age: 52
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,746
Location: Australia

14 Jan 2022, 8:54 pm

Mikah wrote:

Soon after the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, stories began to emerge that some people were experiencing changes to their menstrual cycles after getting vaccinated.

For a long time, this did not get much media attention, and numerous medical experts continued to assure the public that the COVID-19 vaccines did not cause these side effects. Such stories remained confined to conversations, internet forums and social media.


...

Now, a first-of-its-kind, women-led, peer-reviewed study has confirmed the experience of people who menstruate around the world: COVID-19 vaccines can affect periods.

With a dataset of almost 4,000 women, both vaccinated and not, using a menstrual cycle-tracking app, researchers found a clinically significant shift in the cycles of newly vaccinated individuals, lasting nearly one day longer on average.

Cycles typically returned to normal within a month or two, which was the case with me, as well.


See, this doesn't worry me at all.
There are many things which can affect one's menstrual cycle. Heavier or longer flow for a month or two (ie. one or two periods) is hardly the end of the world.
No doubt getting infected with covid is not great for ones hormonal balance either.

I haven't heard anything to indicate a global loss of fertility caused by covid vaccines, and until I do, it's not worth worrying about.



MrsPeel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2017
Age: 52
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,746
Location: Australia

14 Jan 2022, 9:18 pm

Mikah wrote:
More suspect data, this time from Canada's Alberta Province.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/cov ... eaths-soar

A reader has pointed out an amazing dataset from the province of Alberta, Canada which reports Covid cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by day after the first and second vaccine doses.

Hospitalisations:
Image

Deaths:
Image

SOURCE: https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-a ... e-outcomes


I'm not sure about this data.

I mean, I'm not querying the graphs showing timing of the deaths. Looking at the spike of deaths around 0-20 days after vaccination, I would infer that these people may have already been infected with covid when they were vaccinated, but perhaps were not yet showing symptoms and hence thought they were OK to have the vaccine.
Just my hypothesis.

What I'm not sure about is the argument that a reduction in the immune system occurs after vaccination. Is that correct? Because it doesn't make any sense to me that a vaccine designed to increase the immune defence against a virus would have the opposite effect. So what is it saying, that there is a transient dip in immunity before an increase? Or what?



MrsPeel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2017
Age: 52
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,746
Location: Australia

14 Jan 2022, 9:22 pm

that1weirdgrrrl wrote:
Quote:
vaccines transiently suppresses the immune system


This is congruent to what I saw just looking in VAERS. (If anyone wants to look, it's a public database).

There seems to be a trend of people dying of break through infection right around the 2 month mark after vaccination (roughly one to three months, I say 2 months as an average).



But the data Mikah posted indicated increased deaths concentrated within 20 days after vaccination, not 2 months after. What you are saying is not congruent with what he posted at all. Can you post a link for the data showing the increased infections at 1-3 months after vaccination?



MrsPeel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2017
Age: 52
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,746
Location: Australia

14 Jan 2022, 9:36 pm

Mikah wrote:
[i]Impaired Immune Response due to Over-vaccination

A characteristic of the elderly is an impaired ability to mount antibodies against new pathogenic threats, and this is reflected in a failure to generate protective antibodies in response to vaccination. It has been demonstrated in experiments with mice that aged mice have an overabundance of long-lived memory (antigen-experienced) B cells, and this is paired with an inability to generate new B cells from progenitor cells in the bone marrow, as well as impairment in the process of refinement of the antibody response in germinal centers in the spleen and the associated class switching that produces effective IgG antibodies. A significant reduction in the number of naive follicular B cells, combined with an impaired ability to convert them into mature memory B cells leaves these aged mice highly vulnerable to new infections. It is likely that the same principle applies to humans. A plausible conclusion is that aggressive vaccination campaigns accelerate the pace at which an individual’s immune system reaches an “aged” status due to exuberant generation of memory B cells in response to the artificial stimuli induced by repeated vaccination.



Most of that article was scaremongering, I feel.
But I quote the above part as interesting, in relation to your previous post and my response, regarding whether vaccination can reduce immune response rather than enhance it.



Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

15 Jan 2022, 4:57 am

MrsPeel wrote:
What I'm not sure about is the argument that a reduction in the immune system occurs after vaccination. Is that correct? Because it doesn't make any sense to me that a vaccine designed to increase the immune defence against a virus would have the opposite effect. So what is it saying, that there is a transient dip in immunity before an increase? Or what?


It doesn't make sense on the face of it, but it is a real phenomenon. Look up ADE and OAS, that's antibody-dependent enhancement and original antigenic sin. It's the cornerstone of the anti-covid-vaxxers short term worries. Especially since ADE popped up in the early animal trials (and killed every poor cat in that particular trial).


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

15 Jan 2022, 5:24 am

MrsPeel wrote:
that1weirdgrrrl wrote:
Quote:
vaccines transiently suppresses the immune system


This is congruent to what I saw just looking in VAERS. (If anyone wants to look, it's a public database).

There seems to be a trend of people dying of break through infection right around the 2 month mark after vaccination (roughly one to three months, I say 2 months as an average).



But the data Mikah posted indicated increased deaths concentrated within 20 days after vaccination, not 2 months after. What you are saying is not congruent with what he posted at all. Can you post a link for the data showing the increased infections at 1-3 months after vaccination?


I don't think the Alberta data is showing ADE, it's not congruent with the study back on page 3 which showed two of the vaccines having negative efficacy only after roughly 60 days post vaccine. The Alberta data is showing a different phenomenon - possibly simple death-by-vaccine, rather than ADE or something like it. The side effects of the vaccine mimic early covid symptoms and it's possible, if not likely that such a death would be marked as "unvaccinated covid death" - see previous posts re. data collection/poisoning earlier in the thread (Why are the unvaccinated seeing death spikes after NOT getting the vaccine?).

Any deaths in the ADE timeframe may well be marked as something else. I don't know how Canada collects its data or what they do with it, but things like the CDC's data manipulation are entirely possible.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

16 Jan 2022, 12:07 pm

https://www.theepochtimes.com/several-s ... 13438.html

States Investigating Surge in Mortality Rate Among 18–49-Year-Olds, Majority Unrelated to COVID-19

Health departments in several states confirmed to The Epoch Times that they are looking into a steep surge in the mortality rate for people aged 18 to 49 in 2021—a majority of which are not linked to COVID-19.

Deaths among people aged 18 to 49 increased more than 40 percent in the 12 months ending October 2021 compared to the same period in 2018–2019, before the pandemic, according to an analysis by The Epoch Times of death certificate data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The agency doesn’t yet have full 2021 figures, as death certificate data has a lag of up to eight weeks or more.

The surge differed greatly from state to state, with the most dramatic increase in young-to-middle age deaths in the South, Midwest, and the West Coast, while the northeastern states generally saw much milder spikes. Public health authorities in several states with some of the largest increases are examining the issue.

Texas saw the 18 to 49 age mortality jump 61 percent, the second-highest increase in the country. Of that, less than 58 percent was attributed to COVID-19.

“Our Center of Health Statistics is looking at the data,” said Chris Van Deusen, the head of Media Relations at the Texas Department of State Health Services, via email. “We’ll get back with you.”

Florida, which saw an increase of 51 percent, 48 percent of that attributed to COVID-19, is also probing the matter.


I wonder....


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!