Actor Alec Baldwin shoots 2 people, killing one of them.

Page 4 of 18 [ 277 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 18  Next

Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

23 Oct 2021, 4:12 am

Well, this didn't take long:
Image



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Oct 2021, 4:24 am

Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
Replacement Non- union worker was in charge of the prop gun.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com ... p-gun/amp/


Goes to show you, despite what anti-labor types claim, union workers are the most reliable.


It seems like the producer was ignoring union rules\"guidelines":
Quote:
Safety Tips for Use of Firearms

[...]
Treat all guns as if they are loaded and deadly.
[...]
Never point a firearm at anyone including yourself. Always cheat the shot by aiming to the right or left of the target character. If asked to point and shoot directly at a living target, consult with the property master or armorer for the prescribed safety procedures.
[...]
Use protective shields for all off stage cast within close proximity to any shots fired.
[...]
Check the firearm every time you take possession of it. Before each use, make sure the gun has been test-fired off stage and then ask to test fire it yourself. Watch the prop master check the cylinders and barrel to be sure no foreign object or dummy bullet has become lodged inside.

Blanks are extremely dangerous. Even though they do not fire bullets out of the gun barrel, they still have a powerful blast than can maim or kill.
[...]
If you are in a production where shots are to be fired and there is no qualified property master, go to the nearest phone and call Actors' Equity Association. A union representative will make sure proper procedures are followed.

State and federal safety laws must be honored at all times.

Source: https://www.actorsequity.org/resources/Producers/safe-and-sanitary/safety-tips-for-use-of-firearms/

Interestingly, the Producer was a union member - https://www.actorsequity.org/join/HIGMEC/AlecBaldwin/

So it seems union membership has no bearing on this case, nor any relationship to the "reliability" of the person\people involved...


I was talking about the non-union crew (including whoever prepared the gun) who replaced the union workers who walked off the set to protest bad working conditions. Had their concerns been met, this might not have happened.

Maybe a union member substituted some live rounds, hoping to cause the filming to be shut down in order to have safety there investigated, not realising that the round would be used for the type of filming which occurred?
Maybe a union member was responsible for the firing of the other union members because he didn't care about their concerns, and instead brought in non-union staff, whereas a non-union member in the same position might not have done so.
Maybe a union member ignored safety rules and accepted another person's word rather than taking precautions the union requies members to take in that situation, whereas a non-union member may have followed those rules\guidelines.
Maybe a union member had not followed safety requirements in the storing of ammunition, and their replacement wasn't aware of this, whereas a non-union member may have been more responsible in the care of items.

There is nothing here to say that union members are any more (or less) reliable than non-union members... It is equally possible that the same outcome would have occurred regardless of union membership (or lack thereof) of those involved. The actions reflect upon the individuals involved, not some mythical "protection"\"infallibility" conveyed by being a member of a union.


The unionized film crew had had experience on the job, making it more likely that it had been the non-unionized workers without job experience.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

23 Oct 2021, 5:20 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
Replacement Non- union worker was in charge of the prop gun.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com ... p-gun/amp/


Goes to show you, despite what anti-labor types claim, union workers are the most reliable.


It seems like the producer was ignoring union rules\"guidelines":
Quote:
Safety Tips for Use of Firearms

[...]
Treat all guns as if they are loaded and deadly.
[...]
Never point a firearm at anyone including yourself. Always cheat the shot by aiming to the right or left of the target character. If asked to point and shoot directly at a living target, consult with the property master or armorer for the prescribed safety procedures.
[...]
Use protective shields for all off stage cast within close proximity to any shots fired.
[...]
Check the firearm every time you take possession of it. Before each use, make sure the gun has been test-fired off stage and then ask to test fire it yourself. Watch the prop master check the cylinders and barrel to be sure no foreign object or dummy bullet has become lodged inside.

Blanks are extremely dangerous. Even though they do not fire bullets out of the gun barrel, they still have a powerful blast than can maim or kill.
[...]
If you are in a production where shots are to be fired and there is no qualified property master, go to the nearest phone and call Actors' Equity Association. A union representative will make sure proper procedures are followed.

State and federal safety laws must be honored at all times.

Source: https://www.actorsequity.org/resources/Producers/safe-and-sanitary/safety-tips-for-use-of-firearms/

Interestingly, the Producer was a union member - https://www.actorsequity.org/join/HIGMEC/AlecBaldwin/

So it seems union membership has no bearing on this case, nor any relationship to the "reliability" of the person\people involved...


I was talking about the non-union crew (including whoever prepared the gun) who replaced the union workers who walked off the set to protest bad working conditions. Had their concerns been met, this might not have happened.

Maybe a union member substituted some live rounds, hoping to cause the filming to be shut down in order to have safety there investigated, not realising that the round would be used for the type of filming which occurred?
Maybe a union member was responsible for the firing of the other union members because he didn't care about their concerns, and instead brought in non-union staff, whereas a non-union member in the same position might not have done so.
Maybe a union member ignored safety rules and accepted another person's word rather than taking precautions the union requies members to take in that situation, whereas a non-union member may have followed those rules\guidelines.
Maybe a union member had not followed safety requirements in the storing of ammunition, and their replacement wasn't aware of this, whereas a non-union member may have been more responsible in the care of items.

There is nothing here to say that union members are any more (or less) reliable than non-union members... It is equally possible that the same outcome would have occurred regardless of union membership (or lack thereof) of those involved. The actions reflect upon the individuals involved, not some mythical "protection"\"infallibility" conveyed by being a member of a union.


The unionized film crew had had experience on the job, making it more likely that it had been the non-unionized workers without job experience.


So, what you really meant was that it was an experience issue, not a "union" one: After all, an experienced non-union team walking off the job, being replaced by a union team in the same way could have had exactly the same outcome - union membership doesn't convey any "magical powers" or "special abilities" over not being a member, and has no "experience" component\requirement...



Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

23 Oct 2021, 8:04 am

Quote:
SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — As a film crew and actors in Western garb prepared to rehearse a scene inside a wooden, chapel-like building on a desert movie ranch outside Santa Fe, assistant director Dave Halls stepped outside and grabbed a prop gun off a cart.

He walked back in and handed it to the film’s star, Alec Baldwin, assuring him it was safe to use because it didn’t have live ammo.

“Cold gun,” Halls yelled.

It wasn’t, according to court records made public Friday. Instead, when Baldwin pulled the trigger Thursday, he killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounded director Joel Souza, who was standing behind her.

Source: https://apnews.com/article/entertainment-arts-and-entertainment-shootings-movies-santa-fe-9132dc507b5bd9273156f051998e5d03

This raises an interesting question: whether the gun was even expected to hold blanks (instead of being completely unloaded), given it was a merely a rehersal...



TB_TB_TB_TB_TB_TB
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Feb 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 532
Location: Planet Emorf

23 Oct 2021, 11:23 am

Penalty of 18 months jail time and a $5,000 fine?



Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

23 Oct 2021, 11:33 am

TB_TB_TB_TB_TB_TB wrote:
Penalty of 18 months jail time and a $5,000 fine?

That's the upper limits for this category of manslaughter, as far as I have been able to determine, which would likely be the "greatest" charge that could be laid against anyone involved.

There would possibly be other charges as well, which may extend that if imposed consecutively, rather than concurrently. Plus civil damages in seperate actions, which would likely be rather high.



TB_TB_TB_TB_TB_TB
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Feb 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 532
Location: Planet Emorf

23 Oct 2021, 3:52 pm

Brictoria wrote:
TB_TB_TB_TB_TB_TB wrote:
Penalty of 18 months jail time and a $5,000 fine?

That's the upper limits for this category of manslaughter, as far as I have been able to determine, which would likely be the "greatest" charge that could be laid against anyone involved.

There would possibly be other charges as well, which may extend that if imposed consecutively, rather than concurrently. Plus civil damages in seperate actions, which would likely be rather high.


@Brictoria

Surely the Prop Manager, Armorer and Assistant Director are liable as well as the person who inherited the mistake?



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Oct 2021, 6:07 pm

Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
Replacement Non- union worker was in charge of the prop gun.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com ... p-gun/amp/


Goes to show you, despite what anti-labor types claim, union workers are the most reliable.


It seems like the producer was ignoring union rules\"guidelines":
Quote:
Safety Tips for Use of Firearms

[...]
Treat all guns as if they are loaded and deadly.
[...]
Never point a firearm at anyone including yourself. Always cheat the shot by aiming to the right or left of the target character. If asked to point and shoot directly at a living target, consult with the property master or armorer for the prescribed safety procedures.
[...]
Use protective shields for all off stage cast within close proximity to any shots fired.
[...]
Check the firearm every time you take possession of it. Before each use, make sure the gun has been test-fired off stage and then ask to test fire it yourself. Watch the prop master check the cylinders and barrel to be sure no foreign object or dummy bullet has become lodged inside.

Blanks are extremely dangerous. Even though they do not fire bullets out of the gun barrel, they still have a powerful blast than can maim or kill.
[...]
If you are in a production where shots are to be fired and there is no qualified property master, go to the nearest phone and call Actors' Equity Association. A union representative will make sure proper procedures are followed.

State and federal safety laws must be honored at all times.

Source: https://www.actorsequity.org/resources/Producers/safe-and-sanitary/safety-tips-for-use-of-firearms/

Interestingly, the Producer was a union member - https://www.actorsequity.org/join/HIGMEC/AlecBaldwin/

So it seems union membership has no bearing on this case, nor any relationship to the "reliability" of the person\people involved...


I was talking about the non-union crew (including whoever prepared the gun) who replaced the union workers who walked off the set to protest bad working conditions. Had their concerns been met, this might not have happened.

Maybe a union member substituted some live rounds, hoping to cause the filming to be shut down in order to have safety there investigated, not realising that the round would be used for the type of filming which occurred?
Maybe a union member was responsible for the firing of the other union members because he didn't care about their concerns, and instead brought in non-union staff, whereas a non-union member in the same position might not have done so.
Maybe a union member ignored safety rules and accepted another person's word rather than taking precautions the union requies members to take in that situation, whereas a non-union member may have followed those rules\guidelines.
Maybe a union member had not followed safety requirements in the storing of ammunition, and their replacement wasn't aware of this, whereas a non-union member may have been more responsible in the care of items.

There is nothing here to say that union members are any more (or less) reliable than non-union members... It is equally possible that the same outcome would have occurred regardless of union membership (or lack thereof) of those involved. The actions reflect upon the individuals involved, not some mythical "protection"\"infallibility" conveyed by being a member of a union.


The unionized film crew had had experience on the job, making it more likely that it had been the non-unionized workers without job experience.


So, what you really meant was that it was an experience issue, not a "union" one: After all, an experienced non-union team walking off the job, being replaced by a union team in the same way could have had exactly the same outcome - union membership doesn't convey any "magical powers" or "special abilities" over not being a member, and has no "experience" component\requirement...


In a way, yes. As the crew had been unionized for years, they had all the experience non-union workers lacked.
That said, despite the right's denigration of organized labor, the truth is unionized workers, because they are better paid and given better working conditions, are more likely to demonstrate more professional conduct on the job.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Oct 2021, 6:29 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Now to sit back and wait for Fox to equate the deaths with Baldwin's left wing politics.


Not Fox, but it'll do:

https://todayuknews.com/world-news/laur ... n-tragedy/


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,284

23 Oct 2021, 8:48 pm

Court records show that the actor was assured of the safety of the prop gun he fired which killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and injured director Joel Souza.

Assistant director Dave Halls did not know the prop had live ammunition in it and handed it to Baldwin before the fatal incident near Santa Fe, New Mexico, according to court documents.


I assume this should absolve Alec Baldwin of any legal culpability, even if he was the producer. Baldwin can't be held responsible for the actions of the staff on the set.



Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

24 Oct 2021, 12:55 am

Quote:
The smoking gun that claimed the life of Halyna Hutchins might've been more than just an on-set prop -- it was also being fired recreationally, even when cameras weren't rolling.

Multiple sources directly connected to the 'Rust' production tell TMZ ... the same gun Alec Baldwin accidentally fired -- hitting the DP and director -- was being used by crews members off set as well, for what we're told amounted to target practice.

We're told this off-the-clock shooting -- which was allegedly happening away from the movie lot -- was being done with real bullets ... which is how some who worked on the film believe a live round found its way in one of the chambers that day.

Obviously, authorities would want to speak to anyone who had been using the weapon for target practice, and -- more importantly -- to whoever was putting the gun back among others used for filming.

Source: https://www.tmz.com/2021/10/23/alec-baldwin-rust-gun-accident-used-off-set-target-practice/

Off Topic
To help out the site admin, who has recently decided to highlight the potential bias of the sources used:
Image
Image
Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/tmz/


It sounds like someone may have borrowed the gun, returned it to the tray and the assistant director picked it up (possibly without checking with the armorer). This doesn't absolve Mr Baldwin, however, in the same way that a person handed a loaded gun and told it is not loaded who then aims at a person and fires is not absolved of their actions.

Off Topic
It would be interesting to know if the crew members using it offsite were the original (union) crew, or the (non-union) ones who had just commenced on the site.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Oct 2021, 1:09 am

Brictoria wrote:
Quote:
The smoking gun that claimed the life of Halyna Hutchins might've been more than just an on-set prop -- it was also being fired recreationally, even when cameras weren't rolling.

Multiple sources directly connected to the 'Rust' production tell TMZ ... the same gun Alec Baldwin accidentally fired -- hitting the DP and director -- was being used by crews members off set as well, for what we're told amounted to target practice.

We're told this off-the-clock shooting -- which was allegedly happening away from the movie lot -- was being done with real bullets ... which is how some who worked on the film believe a live round found its way in one of the chambers that day.

Obviously, authorities would want to speak to anyone who had been using the weapon for target practice, and -- more importantly -- to whoever was putting the gun back among others used for filming.

Source: https://www.tmz.com/2021/10/23/alec-baldwin-rust-gun-accident-used-off-set-target-practice/

Off Topic
To help out the site admin, who has recently decided to highlight the potential bias of the sources used:
Image
Image
Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/tmz/


It sounds like someone may have borrowed the gun, returned it to the tray and the assistant director picked it up (possibly without checking with the armorer). This doesn't absolve Mr Baldwin, however, in the same way that a person handed a loaded gun and told it is not loaded who then aims at a person and fires is not absolved of their actions.

Off Topic
It would be interesting to know if the crew members using it offsite were the original (union) crew, or the (non-union) ones who had just commenced on the site.


I fail to see how Baldwin would be found culpable. The fault lies with the armorer, as far as I'm concerned.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Brictoria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,998
Location: Melbourne, Australia

24 Oct 2021, 2:23 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
I fail to see how Baldwin would be found culpable. The fault lies with the armorer, as far as I'm concerned.


Maybe this will help?
Quote:
New Mexico criminal lawyer Erlinda Johnson, a former state and federal prosecutor said the Beetlejuice actor could face possible criminal liability for involuntary manslaughter.

“All the state needs to demonstrate is that he was engaged in a lawful, but dangerous act and did not act with due caution,” she said. “That’s what the state has to prove for involuntary manslaughter, which is a fourth-degree felony with a maximum penalty of up to 18 months in prison.”

She speculated that Baldwin may rely on the defence that someone handed him the gun, “but then, well it was incumbent upon him, since he was handling the gun, to make sure there were no rounds.”

Johnson continued: “Clearly someone didn’t do their due diligence. They should have been checking those guns to make sure there were no live rounds.”

Source: https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/movies/alec-baldwin-could-face-manslaughter-charges-says-legal-experts/news-story/f2cb9a4fd221c8a999626d39ccdf9f93

He was handed a firearm, did not personally confirm himself that it was not loaded, then aimed at another person and discharged the weapon.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,783
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Oct 2021, 2:43 am

Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
I fail to see how Baldwin would be found culpable. The fault lies with the armorer, as far as I'm concerned.


Maybe this will help?
Quote:
New Mexico criminal lawyer Erlinda Johnson, a former state and federal prosecutor said the Beetlejuice actor could face possible criminal liability for involuntary manslaughter.

“All the state needs to demonstrate is that he was engaged in a lawful, but dangerous act and did not act with due caution,” she said. “That’s what the state has to prove for involuntary manslaughter, which is a fourth-degree felony with a maximum penalty of up to 18 months in prison.”

She speculated that Baldwin may rely on the defence that someone handed him the gun, “but then, well it was incumbent upon him, since he was handling the gun, to make sure there were no rounds.”

Johnson continued: “Clearly someone didn’t do their due diligence. They should have been checking those guns to make sure there were no live rounds.”

Source: https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/movies/alec-baldwin-could-face-manslaughter-charges-says-legal-experts/news-story/f2cb9a4fd221c8a999626d39ccdf9f93

He was handed a firearm, did not personally confirm himself that it was not loaded, then aimed at another person and discharged the weapon.


If charged and tried, I doubt he'd be convicted.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,284

24 Oct 2021, 4:09 am

I think intent is a big factor. At the end of the day this is an accident.

It is interesting (and frankly not surprising) to see how members of the GOP seem to be displaying "vulture" like behaviour
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jd-vance ... 14320b1a45

I doubt they care less about Halyna Hutchins.

Baldwin has been on the NRA gun sights (pardon the pun) as he's been the most vocal opponent of gun laws in the US.The actor joined with Amy Schumer, Jimmy Kimmel, and more than 130 stars in 2018 to form the “No Rifle Association Initiative,” which aimed to take down the NRA.

He's also the centre of MAGA derision (led by Trump himself) over SNL sketches where he lampooned the former president. Taken in unison, the incident is being used as an opportunity by the NRA/MAGA camp to attack Baldwin while he is exposed.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,098
Location: temperate zone

24 Oct 2021, 4:49 am

cyberdad wrote:
I think intent is a big factor. At the end of the day this is an accident.

It is interesting (and frankly not surprising) to see how members of the GOP seem to be displaying "vulture" like behaviour
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jd-vance ... 14320b1a45

I doubt they care less about Halyna Hutchins.

Baldwin has been on the NRA gun sights (pardon the pun) as he's been the most vocal opponent of gun laws in the US.The actor joined with Amy Schumer, Jimmy Kimmel, and more than 130 stars in 2018 to form the “No Rifle Association Initiative,” which aimed to take down the NRA.

He's also the centre of MAGA derision (led by Trump himself) over SNL sketches where he lampooned the former president. Taken in unison, the incident is being used as an opportunity by the NRA/MAGA camp to attack Baldwin while he is exposed.


In all fairness...poor old Dick Cheney got roasted by comedians, including Jon Stewert, when he accidently shot his best friend on a hunting trip. A far left friend even complained about that ...She would say " I dont like Cheney, but he is now grieving over accidently wounding his friend, and here the media is making fun of him. They need to stop :( ".

BTW...didnt you mean "PROponent". And not "opponent" of "gun laws".

But - yes- as with Cheney - there was not any intent to murder. And Baldwin was probably even less culpable for negligence than Cheney because a whole crew were involved in filming the scene, and for making sure that it was safe. Cheney was on his own, and probably was a bit careless about where he aimed his rifle..