Nobody interested in the Russia-Ukraine conflict?

Post Reply New Topic

Russians have always been like that but meh. What did Ukraine expect?

Perhaps they would be less willing to "intervene" if they knew there wasn't a domino effect towards NATO.

The problem is - we don't want to be buffer / neutral / demilitarized zone. Not when we have a neighbour who readily "intervenes".
I know USA are not saints but if their trigger-happines can help protect us from an invasion - so be it.
It's our interest.

Elon is just a dreamer. To make any valid referendum, you need peace first. Otherwise, it's impossible to organize it fairly.
But why stop at this? Why not ask people in Sachalin if they want to join Japan? North Russia if they want to join Norway or Finland? Buryats, Chechens and Dagestani if they want independence? Or, our beloved meme here, organize a referendum for Kaliningrad District to change the name to Kralovec and join Czechia.
Why not go further with referenda? Does Tibet want to remain in China? Wouldn't North Koreans like to re-unite if they could safely vote for it? Maybe redraw the Indian-Pakistani border? Or give independence to areas controlled by Boko Haram? Why didn't we propose a referendum to accept ISIS as a state?

Can you imagine how many more wars that attitude would spawn?

First of all I wasn’t referring to Poland rather the countries that border the Russian mainland excluding Kaliningrad.

I don’t think Russia is as bothered about NATO as a treaty or article 5 rather US bases on the territory of members that border it that could be used aggressively.

Maybe NATO should just hurry up and accept Ukraine and tell russia to gtfo and if they don’t, level all of their military facilities and logistics systems utilized by their military.

Maybe.

President Joe Biden said Thursday that the risk of nuclear “Armageddon” is at the highest level since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, as Russian officials speak of the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons after suffering massive setbacks in the eight-month invasion of Ukraine.

Speaking at a fundraiser for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Biden said Russian President Vladimir Putin was “a guy I know fairly well” and the Russian leader was “not joking when he talks about the use of tactical nuclear weapons or biological or chemical weapons.”

Biden added, “We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” He suggested the threat from Putin is real “because his military is — you might say — significantly underperforming.”

U.S. officials for months have warned of the prospect that Russia could use weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine as it has faced a series of strategic setbacks on the battlefield, though Biden’s remarks marked the starkest warnings yet issued by the U.S. government about the nuclear stakes.

It was not immediately clear whether Biden was referring to any new assessment of Russian intentions. As recently as this week, though, U.S. officials have said they have seen no change to Russia’s nuclear forces that would require a change in the alert posture of U.S. nuclear forces.

“We have not seen any reason to adjust our own strategic nuclear posture, nor do we have indication that Russia is preparing to imminently use nuclear weapons,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Tuesday.

Biden also challenged Russian nuclear doctrine, warning that the use of a lower-yield tactical weapon could quickly spiral out of control into global destruction.

“I don’t think there is any such a thing as the ability to easily use a tactical nuclear weapon and not end up with Armageddon,” Biden said.

He added that he was still “trying to figure” out Putin’s “off-ramp” in Ukraine.

“Where does he find a way out?” Biden asked. “Where does he find himself in a position that he does not not only lose face but lose significant power within Russia?”

Putin has repeatedly alluded to using his country’s vast nuclear arsenal, including last month when he announced plans to conscript Russian men to serve in Ukraine.

“I want to remind you that our country also has various means of destruction ... and when the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, to protect Russia and our people, we will certainly use all the means at our disposal,” Putin said Sept. 21, adding with a lingering stare at the camera, “It’s not a bluff.”

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said last week that the U.S. has been “clear” to Russia about what the “consequences” of using a nuclear weapon in Ukraine would be.

“This is something that we are attuned to, taking very seriously, and communicating directly with Russia about, including the kind of decisive responses the United States would have if they went down that dark road,” Sullivan said.

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said earlier Thursday that Putin understood that the “world will never forgive” a Russian nuclear strike.

“He understands that after the use of nuclear weapons he would be unable any more to preserve, so to speak, his life, and I’m confident of that,” Zelenskyy said.

The Russian government is laying the groundwork to use nuclear arms, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Friday, adding that he did not think a decision on whether to use such weapons had been made but that even talking about it was "dangerous."

Speaking with the BBC, Zelenskyy said Russia had begun "to prepare their society" for a nuclear strike in Ukraine, where Russian forces have been retreating in the wake of a Ukrainian counteroffensive in which the country recaptured territory that was annexed by Moscow a week ago. Zelenskyy added of the prospect of nuclear warfare: "That's very dangerous."

Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons, recently saying the US had set a "precedent" by dropping atomic bombs in World War II. While their use is still deemed exceedingly unlikely by analysts, Western officials are taking the threats seriously and monitoring Russia for any signs it may be preparing to use a smaller, tactical nuclear weapon on the battlefield — a possibility that one expert told Insider was "extraordinarily" concerning.

While noting he shared such concerns, Zelenskyy said there was no reason to be fatalistic about a Russian threat designed to make Western nations think twice about supporting Ukraine.

"They are not ready to do it, to use it. But they begin to communicate. They don't know whether they'll use or not use it," he said, adding: "I think it's dangerous to even speak about it."

Zelenskyy said Russia was already threatening the world with its actions at Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, which it occupied in early March. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency last month said the situation at the plant was "untenable," adding: "We are one step away from a nuclear accident." The standoff has raised fears of another Chernobyl disaster, the 1986 nuclear-reactor meltdown that spread dangerous radiation across Europe.

The Ukrainian president urged his allies to impose additional sanctions on Russia to discourage any sort of nuclear duress.

Since invading Ukraine in February, Putin has made multiple nuclear weapons threats, recently vowing to use “all available means” in the war.

“The U.S. wants to warn Russia that the use of any nuclear weapon would be a blunder of strategic dimensions," said Sharon Squassoni, a research professor at George Washington University.

The White House and the Pentagon tried walking back Biden's “Armageddon” comments Friday, saying there is no 'imminent' threat and no new indication that Putin is planning to launch this kind of attack.

"The president’s comments have been very consistent. He was reinforcing what we have been saying, which is how seriously we take these threats about nuclear weapons," press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters while en route to Hagerstown, Maryland. "The kind of irresponsible rhetoric we have seen is no way for the leader of a nuclear-armed state to speak and that’s what the president was making very clear."

Putin is facing tough talk from his own advisors. The Washington Post reports that according to U.S. intelligence, a member of Putin's circle confronted him over his handling of the war.

“I believe that at this point his position in Russia is weaker than it was before, and he gets more and more weak every day,” said Boris Bondarev, former counselor at the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations.

Just this week, the U.S. purchased $290 million of anti-radiation drugs. The Department of Health and Human Services says that the drug supply was part of ongoing efforts to be better prepared following radiological and nuclear emergencies.

Oh, come on, no one believes this "liberating" crap, even the ones telling it.
Current narrative is that they are not fighting Ukraine but NATO. Because it would be less painful to be defeated by the most powerful military alliance than to be defeated by "not even a nation", as they present Ukraine.