Q-Anon Founder Hosted Child Porn Domains

Page 1 of 3 [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,452
Location: Right over your left shoulder

10 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm

QAnon Is Supposed to Be All About Protecting Kids. Its Primary Enabler Appears to Have Hosted Child Porn Domains.

Quote:
One dark irony of QAnon has always been that the conspiracy theory, which holds that President Trump is waging a war on a cabal of elite liberal pedophiles, rose to prominence on 8chan, an imageboard where users swapped child pornography.

But that irony may have a darker, deeper layer: Mother Jones has uncovered that Jim Watkins, the owner of 8chan and its successor site, 8kun, controls a company that hosted scores of domains whose names suggest they are connected to child pornography.

While Mother Jones did not visit the domains because of strict laws related to viewing child sex abuse material, internet registration and hosting data suggest at a minimum that Watkins profited from domains with names explicitly related to pedophilia—the very thing that QAnon followers say that they’re motivated to end. The domains’ names include terms such as “preteen,” “schoolgirl,” and “child” alongside graphic terms for genitalia and words like “rape” and “love.” It’s unclear what, if anything, is currently being served at the domains. However, an analysis of metadata collected years ago from one by archive.org shows dozens of filenames and links containing highly suggestive terms, including “xxxpreteen,” “children,” and sexual references to girls aged 12 to 15.

Some of the domains date back to the late 1990s and may no longer be active, while others currently resolve to IP addresses controlled by Watkins’ company, N.T. Technology, according to records compiled by Farsight Security, a cybersecurity company that archives historical routing data detailing relationships among domain names, IP addresses, name servers, and other digital assets.

Watkins, who some experts believe has an active role in maintaining the QAnon account on 8kun, dismissed Mother Jones’ questions about the domains as “an attempt to smear [his] name and print something awful,” offering varying explanations why they were on N.T. Technology’s servers. “We’re not child pornographers, and we don’t host child pornography, and we don’t condone that,” he insisted.

A group of anti-Q researchers that includes Aubrey Cottle, a founder of the online collective Anonymous, brought Watkins’ connection to the domains to Mother Jones’ attention. Another researcher, who asked not to be named to avoid harassment from Watkins supporters, reviewed the historical domain and routing information at Mother Jones’ request and agreed the records showed that N.T. Technology “hosted many domains with CP [child pornography] themed names over an extended period of time.”

Using a combination of open-source and commercially available data, the researcher confirmed that the domains pointed to IP addresses registered to N.T. Technology, and that the IP addresses were routed to the company’s network while the explicit domains were active.

One domain created in 1998 and hosted by N.T. Technology, which bills itself as “a powerhouse in the internet world, [s]upporting some of the largest sites on Earth,” lists Watkins as its administrator and names a separate holding company he owns, Is It Wet Yet Inc., as the administration organization. According to historical domain and web archive records, the domain has, over the years, been associated with dozens of subdomains—more specific and focused offshoots of the main domain—whose names combine terms like “preteen,” “kidnap,” and “rape.” They include a comprehensive system of subdomains referencing age ranges as young as 10. When asked about the specific domain, Watkins said “I have really no idea about” it.

...


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,470
Location: Aux Arcs

10 Mar 2022, 9:29 pm

He wanted to save the kids for himself.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


shlaifu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 May 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,659

10 Mar 2022, 10:58 pm

are any of the servers located in the basement of a pizza place?


_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,827
Location: Stendec

10 Mar 2022, 11:30 pm

So “Pizzagate” was only wishful thinking by QNuts, Trumpsters, and other Ring-Wing fanatics.

I feel surprised, but not amazed.



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 45,519
Location: Houston, Texas

10 Mar 2022, 11:34 pm

Fnord wrote:
So “Pizzagate” was only wishful thinking by QNuts, Trumpsters, and other Ring-Wing fanatics.

I feel surprised, but not amazed.


They just couldn't admit that simply didn't want a female president. Pizzagate: false, Benghazi: false, E-mailgate: false.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,452
Location: Right over your left shoulder

10 Mar 2022, 11:36 pm

Fnord wrote:
So “Pizzagate” was only wishful thinking by QNuts, Trumpsters, and other Ring-Wing fanatics.

I feel surprised, but not amazed.


Wishful thinking? I'd go further and suggest it's projection.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


r00tb33r
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 May 2016
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,778

10 Mar 2022, 11:42 pm

Tim_Tex wrote:
Benghazi: false

This one is half true. She showed up to the hearing in lenses as thick as a shoe sole, and replied "I don't recall" to literally everything like her legal team told her to. We hadn't seen those lenses ever again.
Tim_Tex wrote:
E-mailgate: false.

She got away with this one, the wrongdoing was found... But she wasn't charged.
https://time.com/4394178/hillary-clinto ... stigation/
It's quite unthinkable that a public official (the Secretary of State, no less) can keep all of the communication on an unmonitored platform, and destroy it when it is subpoenaed, and go completely unpunished. This had set up a very damaging legal precedent for our country.


_________________
Enjoy the silence.


Last edited by r00tb33r on 10 Mar 2022, 11:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,470
Location: Aux Arcs

10 Mar 2022, 11:43 pm

Q lures children to a dark basement with offers of free pizzas and fun games.
Lordy,is Q Chuck E. Cheese??


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,827
Location: Stendec

10 Mar 2022, 11:47 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Fnord wrote:
So “Pizzagate” was only wishful thinking by QNuts, Trumpsters, and other Ring-Wing fanatics. I feel surprised, but not amazed.
Wishful thinking? I'd go further and suggest it's projection.
Upon further thought, it seems I must agree with you.

What better way to divert attention from one’s own criminal behavior than to accuse one’s opponents of the same crimes (i.e., pedophilia, election fraud, et cetera)?



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

11 Mar 2022, 3:19 am

Weren't QAnon the ones claiming Democrats were run by a secret organization of pedophiles?

Well... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Matrix Glitch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2021
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,741
Location: US

11 Mar 2022, 5:20 am

funeralxempire wrote:
QAnon Is Supposed to Be All About Protecting Kids. Its Primary Enabler Appears to Have Hosted Child Porn Domains.

Quote:
One dark irony of QAnon has always been that the conspiracy theory, which holds that President Trump is waging a war on a cabal of elite liberal pedophiles, rose to prominence on 8chan, an imageboard where users swapped child pornography.

But that irony may have a darker, deeper layer: Mother Jones has uncovered that Jim Watkins, the owner of 8chan and its successor site, 8kun, controls a company that hosted scores of domains whose names suggest they are connected to child pornography.

While Mother Jones did not visit the domains because of strict laws related to viewing child sex abuse material, internet registration and hosting data suggest at a minimum that Watkins profited from domains with names explicitly related to pedophilia—the very thing that QAnon followers say that they’re motivated to end. The domains’ names include terms such as “preteen,” “schoolgirl,” and “child” alongside graphic terms for genitalia and words like “rape” and “love.” It’s unclear what, if anything, is currently being served at the domains. However, an analysis of metadata collected years ago from one by archive.org shows dozens of filenames and links containing highly suggestive terms, including “xxxpreteen,” “children,” and sexual references to girls aged 12 to 15.

Some of the domains date back to the late 1990s and may no longer be active, while others currently resolve to IP addresses controlled by Watkins’ company, N.T. Technology, according to records compiled by Farsight Security, a cybersecurity company that archives historical routing data detailing relationships among domain names, IP addresses, name servers, and other digital assets.

Watkins, who some experts believe has an active role in maintaining the QAnon account on 8kun, dismissed Mother Jones’ questions about the domains as “an attempt to smear [his] name and print something awful,” offering varying explanations why they were on N.T. Technology’s servers. “We’re not child pornographers, and we don’t host child pornography, and we don’t condone that,” he insisted.

A group of anti-Q researchers that includes Aubrey Cottle, a founder of the online collective Anonymous, brought Watkins’ connection to the domains to Mother Jones’ attention. Another researcher, who asked not to be named to avoid harassment from Watkins supporters, reviewed the historical domain and routing information at Mother Jones’ request and agreed the records showed that N.T. Technology “hosted many domains with CP [child pornography] themed names over an extended period of time.”

Using a combination of open-source and commercially available data, the researcher confirmed that the domains pointed to IP addresses registered to N.T. Technology, and that the IP addresses were routed to the company’s network while the explicit domains were active.

One domain created in 1998 and hosted by N.T. Technology, which bills itself as “a powerhouse in the internet world, [s]upporting some of the largest sites on Earth,” lists Watkins as its administrator and names a separate holding company he owns, Is It Wet Yet Inc., as the administration organization. According to historical domain and web archive records, the domain has, over the years, been associated with dozens of subdomains—more specific and focused offshoots of the main domain—whose names combine terms like “preteen,” “kidnap,” and “rape.” They include a comprehensive system of subdomains referencing age ranges as young as 10. When asked about the specific domain, Watkins said “I have really no idea about” it.

...


I'm no fan of Q-anon, but the above is quite flimsy. If it's at all real in any way, there's nothing stopping the US department of justice from investing those websites. As well as internet watchdog organizations. At the very least it would seem that Jim Watkins has some splainin to do.



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 45,519
Location: Houston, Texas

11 Mar 2022, 10:39 am

magz wrote:
Weren't QAnon the ones claiming Democrats were run by a secret organization of pedophiles?

Well... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection


Yes. They think expanding LGBT rights would be a stepping stone for pedophiles to demand expanded rights.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,452
Location: Right over your left shoulder

11 Mar 2022, 10:43 am

Matrix Glitch wrote:
I'm no fan of Q-anon, but the above is quite flimsy. If it's at all real in any way, there's nothing stopping the US department of justice from investing those websites. As well as internet watchdog organizations. At the very least it would seem that Jim Watkins has some splainin to do.


It certainly justifies looking into it further, although if it's cartoons and 'glamour modelling' that might change if it's criminal and lead to no charges but it doesn't change that it's for pedophiles.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,284

11 Mar 2022, 4:36 pm

Given 1 in 5 Americans subscribe to Q, that's an estimated 60-70 million Americans. Does anyone seriously think all of them are oblivious to the weird kookiness of their ideas around pedophilia?

I'm taking a wild guess that we haven't seen the end of storming the Capitol building and might see history repeat itself in 2024 especially since the biggest supporter of their crackpot theories might have his small hands back on the nuclear triggers.



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 45,519
Location: Houston, Texas

11 Mar 2022, 4:42 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Matrix Glitch wrote:
I'm no fan of Q-anon, but the above is quite flimsy. If it's at all real in any way, there's nothing stopping the US department of justice from investing those websites. As well as internet watchdog organizations. At the very least it would seem that Jim Watkins has some splainin to do.


It certainly justifies looking into it further, although if it's cartoons and 'glamour modelling' that might change if it's criminal and lead to no charges but it doesn't change that it's for pedophiles.


I no longer believe the crap about the "satanic pedo ring".

Their use of the word "pedophile" is for the same reason Joe McCarthy used the word "communist"-- to discredit opposition.

As with being labeled a "communist" in the 50s, simply being accused of being a "pedophile" will result in permanent social pariahdom, even if you're completely innocent.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!