STUDY: Ivermectin Ineffective Against Covid.

Page 3 of 3 [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

05 Apr 2022, 5:23 pm

Matrix Glitch wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Matrix Glitch wrote:
Who funded the study? Pfizer or Moderna?


There has been speculation that because Ivermectin is dirt cheap in comparison to other "cures"/treatments/preventions, it is ridiculed because there isn't enough profit in it.
Would I be surprised if this was actually the case?
Could big business be that callous?
What do you think? ;)


The vaccine is actually free.


No, it isn't. Not here in Australia.
It is the *Taxpayer* who pays.
I pay taxes, btw. 8)


But is any single tax payer seriously going to notice it?


The point is Pfizer and Moderna aka Big Pharma are making big bucks off their vaccines. It stands to reason they would want to discredit alternatives.


Some people have missed this simple point. 8)



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,790
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Apr 2022, 7:02 pm

Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Matrix Glitch wrote:
Who funded the study? Pfizer or Moderna ?


There has been speculation that because Ivermectin is dirt cheap in comparison to other "cures"/treatments/preventions, it is ridiculed because there isn't enough profit in it.
Would I be surprised if this was actually the case?
Could big business be that callous?
What do you think? ;)


The vaccine is actually free.


No, it isn't. Not here in Australia.
It is the *Taxpayer* who pays.
I pay taxes, btw. 8)


But is any single tax payer seriously going to notice it?


A non-sequitur, my good friend. ;)


If you're not going to notice it, then it aint going to hurt.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,687
Location: Northern California

05 Apr 2022, 7:40 pm

Matrix Glitch wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Matrix Glitch wrote:
Who funded the study? Pfizer or Moderna?


There has been speculation that because Ivermectin is dirt cheap in comparison to other "cures"/treatments/preventions, it is ridiculed because there isn't enough profit in it.
Would I be surprised if this was actually the case?
Could big business be that callous?
What do you think? ;)


The vaccine is actually free.


No, it isn't. Not here in Australia.
It is the *Taxpayer* who pays.
I pay taxes, btw. 8)


But is any single tax payer seriously going to notice it?


The point is Pfizer and Moderna aka Big Pharma are making big bucks off their vaccines. It stands to reason they would want to discredit alternatives.


Just because they have incentive and could, doesn't mean they are.

My direct industry contacts work for neither, but do have inside information on the science. I can point to multiple companies that are "in the know" and busy spending money getting themselves fully vaccinated and boosted. Not just hyping it for others, but living by it. The type of conspiracy it would take to be pulling one over given all that I DO know simply isn't possible.

The vaccines are not perfect but are preventing deaths. And, as I said in an earlier post, I am firmly convinced that the only reason I did contract COVID-19 from my son was that I am not only vaccinated, but also boosted, and still within the most effective time period for those shots.

Long COVID-19 and other long term lingering side effects should be enough to make people want to use the BEST tools out there to prevent getting sick in the first place.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).