SCOTUS Judges streets Doxxed, Google takes pages down

Post Reply New Topic

Map Doxxing Supreme Court Justices Taken Down for Violating Google’s ‘Terms of Service’

Supreme Court justices get increased security after Roe v. Wade leak: "The risk is real"

Last edited by ASPartOfMe on 06 May 2022, 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Due to today's dismissal of Trump's case against Twitter, a precedent has been set such that the users of those Google accounts will have little to no success in suing Google for violating their "Freedom of Speech".

The American Taliban should never feel safe.

Sometimes people getting what they deserve and what is best for the country conflict. Right now we are in a cycle where people are one upping each other in norm breaking. Of course some norms are meant to be broken. Breaking the one that members of the judiciary and their families should feel secure starts us on the road to places like Central America where judges are regularly assassinated by drug cartels.

I'm not suggesting that direct action of that sort would be justifiable. That said, I'm not sure they should be able to steal a fundamental right from roughly half of the country without people getting angry enough for that to be a potential concern.

People are pissed because those monsters took an important right away and lied to get to the position they exploited to do so. If they're not disbarred and removed the institution they're a part of can no longer be respected and that's an ever worse scenario than what you propose.

The only way to actually maintain rule of law is to uphold it and disbar the ones who committed perjury when they went in front of Congress.

The thing is they did not have to lie the Republicans would have voted them in any way, with more discomfort, maybe.
Every politician that voted for them(and against them) did the exact same thing that they did to get their jobs.

They're not worthy of respect because of their perjury, they're not fit to serve and have destroyed the court's legitimacy in a way bullets never could. It's too late to avoid the outcome you're concerned about because it's already happened.

Politicians never were much respected for this, reason and SCOTUS is heading that way. While protest is expected, involving family members or neighbors who just by circumstance live next door, or people who have the misfortune of dining in the same restaurant at the same time as targets of protest hurts whatever cause one is protesting for.

Back in the 70s an actual Nazi war criminal lived in my neighborhood. The Jewish Defense League staged protests, stabbed an innocent person who worked in the house, the house was firebombed. People actually started feeling sorry for the “poor old” Nazi. Luckily I was away at school at the time but it was hell for my siblings.

You still seem to be more focused on the reaction to the actions that caused the loss of legitimacy, rather than the loss of legitimacy itself.

You're talking like the option to preserve rule of law still exists despite the fact that this action indicates it already doesn't exist. If someone were to shoot Kavanaugh it would do less damage than he's already done. Him and his accomplices are the ones who likely irreparably damaged America and complaining about the reaction to their damage misses the point. Violence won't fix the problem but it can't actually make it worse. All use of force can do is hurry up the inevitable.

ISIS has already invaded, it's well past the point of only discussing how to engage in milquetoast protest against their actions when they're actively destroying civilization.

Comparing SCOTUS judges to ISIS is hyperbole. Until they authorize public beheadings and massive destruction or would if they could the ISIS comparisons are getting into grooming accusation territory. Ruth Bader Ginsberg had qualms about the constitutionality of Roe V Wade.

There is a rule by law solution, the proposed bill in Congress to legalize the right to an abortion. While it is not logical the pro abortion choice cause should be affected by what people who are pro abortion choice think about other issues, or how they are perceived as people it does. These factors are more important then merit.

IMHO what is going on here is that the pro abortion choice people became complacent. Roe v. Wade was rule of law for almost half a century. Sure the anti choice people had their anniversary rallies, some assassinated doctors and bombed abortion clinics. All of it seemed pathetic and so routine as to be ignored. Thing is the anti choice side never became complacent. When that meant really religious people voting for the big time sinner they had no qualms about doing so, the ends justified the means. The rest of the country on both sides had moved on. Trump’s persona was the number one issue for the rest of the country.

The tendency when one realizes one has been complacent is to both panic and to try and make up all at once for the lost time one is partially responsible for. In other words overcorrection, Yours truly has been guilty of that more then I care to admit. Usually that results in bad choices.

I realize this is much easier said then done, draw down too much and get wiped out. What exactly is the limit to drawing down?. Is there any drawing down that will not result in unilaterally handing the other side victory?. What I do know if nobody gets off this cycle of escalation this will be an unbearable place to live, If you live at all.