What is WP for?
Given that the Hunter Biden laptop controversy is a highly contentious topic in and of itself, it makes perfect sense to me to put that debate in a separate thread.
To me it seems best to have no more than one highly contentious topic per thread. If topic A depends on topic B for context, then posts in thread A could contain links to relevant posts in thread B, instead of making arguments on topic B directly.
That seems like a rather fragmented approach to conversation. Why not let the topic evolve in an organic way?
Well, instead of talking about the topic at hand it often turns into a “discussion” that’s already going on in another thread. The OP should be able to explore the subject that they broached in their initial post without it turning into an off-topic argument.
This is less of a problem in fun, lighthearted threads, I think. It’s more of an issue in serious threads.
In a poltical discussion, there are many connections that need to be explored.
Given that the Hunter Biden laptop controversy is a highly contentious topic in and of itself, it makes perfect sense to me to put that debate in a separate thread.
To me it seems best to have no more than one highly contentious topic per thread. If topic A depends on topic B for context, then posts in thread A could contain links to relevant posts in thread B, instead of making arguments on topic B directly.
That seems like a rather fragmented approach to conversation. Why not let the topic evolve in an organic way?
Well, instead of talking about the topic at hand it often turns into a “discussion” that’s already going on in another thread. The OP should be able to explore the subject that they broached in their initial post without it turning into an off-topic argument.
This is less of a problem in fun, lighthearted threads, I think. It’s more of an issue in serious threads.
In a poltical discussion, there are many connections that need to be explored.
Sometimes posters try to turn a thread into an argument that’s already being explored elsewhere.
The mods usually consider what the author of the thread wants when it comes to this issue.
_________________
Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn and caldron bubble.
In political discussions in particular, if the topic isn't constrained, the discussion is much more likely to get extremely heated.
The connections between different political topics can be topics unto themselves, each in its own thread.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
- My Twitter / "X" (new as of 2021)
In political discussions in particular, if the topic isn't constrained, the discussion is much more likely to get extremely heated.
The connections between different political topics can be topics unto themselves, each in its own thread.
You can't have a meaningful conversation in a,vacuum.
In political discussions in particular, if the topic isn't constrained, the discussion is much more likely to get extremely heated.
The connections between different political topics can be topics unto themselves, each in its own thread.
You can't have a meaningful conversation in a,vacuum.
Many on-topic, meaningful conversations take place here.
_________________
Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn and caldron bubble.
In political discussions in particular, if the topic isn't constrained, the discussion is much more likely to get extremely heated.
The connections between different political topics can be topics unto themselves, each in its own thread.
You can't have a meaningful conversation in a,vacuum.
Many on-topic, meaningful conversations take place here.
I'm sure, but that's rather beside my point.
In political discussions in particular, if the topic isn't constrained, the discussion is much more likely to get extremely heated.
The connections between different political topics can be topics unto themselves, each in its own thread.
You can't have a meaningful conversation in a,vacuum.
Many on-topic, meaningful conversations take place here.
I'm sure, but that's rather beside my point.
It seems to negate your point.
People can have differing opinions here. They should probably avoid derailing threads with a contentious side point that will start an argument and/or is worthy of its own thread.
_________________
Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn and caldron bubble.
To an extent this is okay.
However, there need to be some constraints. What works well in one-to-one conversation, or in a small group of friends, does NOT necessarily work well in a larger group. A large-group conversation needs to be more structured and focused.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
- My Twitter / "X" (new as of 2021)
I haven't really come across the first example, usually it's people picking holes in what the OP said, which is annoying.
_________________
That alien woman. On Earth to observe and wonder about homo sapiens.
To an extent this is okay.
However, there need to be some constraints. What works well in one-to-one conversation, or in a small group of friends, does NOT necessarily work well in a larger group. A large-group conversation needs to be more structured and focused.
I'm not big on rigid structure. But that's just me. I'm kind of an advocate of freestyle conversations.
Alas, "freestyle conversations" in large Internet forums tend to become cesspools. 4chan is the most infamous example, but I've seen plenty of others as well, e.g. Usenet back in the mid-to-late-1990's.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
- My Twitter / "X" (new as of 2021)
Alas, "freestyle conversations" in large Internet forums tend to become cesspools. 4chan is the most infamous example, but I've seen plenty of others as well, e.g. Usenet back in the mid-to-late-1990's.
I'm not big on controlling conversations. It seems quite ridiculous to me. Eventually it becomes a form of censorship. And when that happens...well, it doesn't end well.
Conversations, both online, and IRL tend to drift from topic to topic much like a lone person's train of thought tends to go from one topic to the next. Organically, and gradually.
But if were all talking about Alex Jones spreading lies, and Person X jumps in and says "you all are bunch of dunderheads because you care about Alex Jones...what about the lies the government tells?"
Its sudden, its disrepectful to others on the thread, AND its ALSO illogical. Illogical because one of the reasons that we are all discussing AJ is because ...he lies that the Government is telling specific lies - and even staging fake mass murders. So if you're worried about the government telling real lies then thats ALL THE MORE REASON to be concerned about someone like AJ who muddies the issue - and makes it hard to tell which are the real lies that the govt might really be telling from the hysterical false accusations of lying that someone AJ makes about the govt.
Clearly Person X would be practicing "derailing", and doing so in nasty, abrupt, and in frankly a rather self defeating way.
Person X would be better off starting a seperate thread. He could even reference the first thread by "saying folks are upset about AJ, but not about the govt". And then proceed to make whatever his point is.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,460
Location: Right over your left shoulder
I'm not sure it's most non-Americans, often there's several non-Americans who are just as interested in bickering over him.
_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う