Muse933277 wrote:
MaxE wrote:
Another question: what constitutes sub5 for women?
Here are some pictures of sub5 women for reference. Obesity is the most common reason for being a sub5, but having an overly masculine face can also bring down a woman's attractiveness as well.
Okay, I had a feeling it was something like this.
Here's the thing: someone's attractiveness doesn't tell you all that much about them. Looks do matter, but they're only part of the equation. And looks fade no matter what you do. If you did get someone who was "high-value" by your standards, what happens when they get old? What happens if she gets sick and gains some weight? Do you try to ditch her for a younger model?
Because that's a very contemptible thing to do.
There's also personal taste. Some people prefer heavier partners, or partners with more androgynous features, etc.
What I will say is, if you're looking for a long-term relationship, you need some level of attraction but what's even more important is emotional compatibility. That's what keeps you in there for the long haul.
If you're looking for a short-term relationship, well, someone's looks don't indicate whether or not they'll be fun to be with or if they'll be good in bed. So again, focus mostly on someone you enjoy being with.
Saying that a person's value is tied to their appearance is very reductive. I don't know anything about these women, and neither do you. They might be wonderful people (or not). A picture won't tell us very much. Thinking that looks are all that matters is maybe forgivable for someone still in high school, but anyone older than that ought to know better.