In many ways they are on a par - moderate, informed drug use isn't necessarily harmful, and neither is moderate, informed car use.
The key thing is to stay sensible and be aware of the wider risks and repercussions. Also, to only push the limits so far ("soft" drugs have a comparatively minor social impact, as do small and efficient cars).
The key difference is that most people still don't understand that driving a gas-guzzling car is just as wrong as snorting Coke. Why?
- because the resulting changes are invisible (hard to detect in everyday life), and happen slowly
- because most western economies are oil-led
- because people are very defensive over their right to drive, because driving = "freedom"
- because car drivers are voters, and so politicians are scared to act
- because most people drive, individual responsibility is weakened: "well, everybody does it"
- oil and car companies are very keen to stress their high-tec green credentials, and we really WANT to believe them. Self-delusion is a wonderful thing.
The issue is knowing when you are doing wrong. It doesn't mean you have to stop completely, but you should attempt to repay the social debts somehow. I love Alfa Romeos and I own a 1.8 Twin Spark. But I use public transport most of the time and I only use the car when there is no other option. Not ideal, but "balancing the books" as best I can. In the long run I would like to do without it completely, but that will involve a significant change in lifestyle.
_________________
The Sociable Hermit says:
Rock'n'Roll...