Female dating coaches part of the problem

Post Reply New Topic

Female dating coaches who coach single women are causing big problems

One of the most popular female coaches in Australia is Sabrina Zohar who charges her clients $200/hr

Her creed is Marriage has “nothing to do with love” as Zohar puts it, because to many men, women represent sexual objects, live-in nannies and cleaners, not full human beings. This is why “whoever is in front of him” at the time will do."
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/relat ... c0c9c122fe

Coaches like Zohar might be one of the reasons why 70% of divorces are initiated by women and of those only half will re-enter a permanent relationship again
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-tren ... -do-again/

What are your thoughts on this?

Very simple, Female dating coaches are not qualified to speak on male psychology
1. They have no formal qualification in psychology
2. They are not men
3. If they are not male then they are interpreting cis-male mind through what they read and limited observations of men.

They (or at least Zohar) are perpetuating a dangerous myth that men use women in relationships. I don't believe this is true.

Interesting thread.

Well, she is severely misguided.

I think men would want to marry someone who is a close companion.

I don't think female dating coaches are the problem as they are not that influencial in society.
Only a few clients are listening to them.

There are female dating coaches who probably offer good advice as well.

I really don't think that dating coaches are that popular or are causing widespread "big problems" ( ). They probably cater to less than 1% of the population.

I doubt dating coaches would have much of an impact because, as I've already stated, most people don't use them and, second, not all coaches would be bad.

The data you've provided does not support your claim. It would only be useful if it involved people who saw dating coaches and had no success.

I can think of more important/more likely factors that would explain those numbers, but I won’t go into them here.

I have my doubts that cis males exist. Most of the males I've met seem happy to be females in games. Maleness is an extension of female DNA code, female DNA is the base code.

That is, males are toxic when they are losers. I've rarely heard a male be toxic when their teammates are working together and winning the game. Toxic masculinity only exists when something is failing.

Thanks for sharing your point of view that women can't know men's psychology.

In the past, people have posted videos with men explaining women's psychology as it pertains to dating.
I can't think of specific titles, but I saw some where the male host blamed women for a decline in dating.
If I recall correctly, the hosts showed statistics to prove women are too choosy and unrealistic about men.

To what extent do you agree with these statements about male hosts discussing women?

1. They have no formal education in psychology
2. They are not women
3. If they are not female, they are interpreting the cis-female mind through what they read / limited observations of women.

4. They are perpetuating a dangerous myth that women use men in relationships. (I don't believe this is true.)

Please share your point of view of whether men can know women's psychology.


Thanks!

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/relat ... c0c9c122fe

I'd say she has a good point. I've heard it observed elsewhere that, one day, a man wakes up, decides that it is time to get married, and then just goes and does it.

A common complaint that you hear from young women about their fellows is that they "don't want commitment."



She raises some valid points.

What does a man want? Basically, three things. Food, sex, and silence. Feed me, f**k me, shut the f**k up. That's it.

What does a woman want? Everything. Every f*****g thing. A big house, a luxury car, clothes, jewelry, etc. etc.



Fortunately, Disney has moved on from the princess passively waiting for her handsome prince to rescue her, to princesses that are more self-actualizing.

But, a lot of young women are probably still hoping for a fairy-tale prince, and, of course, are going to be disappointed and bitter when reality sinks in.

No, just no. As a woman, I don’t want any of those things, and I don’t think that your description of what men want is usually very accurate either. If it is, I’m staying single.

Gender stereotyping is not helpful.

Probably true, most of the time. But, they obsess about women, and cum to their own conclusions.



Obviously.



Yes.



It does happen. A man might like to know what to expect, rather than be blindsided.

^ I don’t find any conclusions that arousing frankly.

I find that hard to believe.

!

Cornflake wrote:

The thread gets off to a bad start and manages to get worse. cyberdad wrote: Female dating coaches are not qualified to speak on male psychology 2. They are not men IsabellaLinton wrote: Thanks for sharing your point of view that women can't know men's psychology. (...) To what extent do you agree with these statements about male hosts discussing women? 2. They are not women Already subject to reports about content, the thread is sexist and heading toward more red-pill nonsense RSN. Let's no go there again. Locked.