Page 1 of 1 [ 12 posts ] 

GreenVelvetWorm
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 3 May 2023
Age: 30
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 363
Location: Canada

28 May 2023, 8:17 pm

I've heard that most people on the spectrum prefer to be called an "autistic person" as opposed to a "person with autism", because autism is so linked to one's personality/identity that it doesn't make sense to refer to it as a separate thing you "have" (unlike for example, a person with allergies or a person with cancer).

I agree with this and also prefer this terminology for myself, but it's made me wonder- why isn't it the same case with adhd? We pretty much always say someone "has adhd". Is it just because we don't have a good adjective form for the word, or is there something different about it that makes it better suited to "person-first" language?

(For reference I don't have adhd and I'm not implying that this difference in terminology is a bad thing, im just confused by it)



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,887
Location: Stendec

28 May 2023, 8:22 pm

I am tired of all this Political Correctness.  Identity first or identity last makes no difference.  An Autistic is an Autistic is an Autistic -- always has been and always will be -- and brainwashing people into using 'correct' euphemisms will never change that, because changing labels does not change the person.

We are not our labels.


_________________
 
No love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.


GreenVelvetWorm
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 3 May 2023
Age: 30
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 363
Location: Canada

28 May 2023, 8:29 pm

Fnord wrote:
I am tired of all this Political Correctness.  Identity first or identity last makes no difference.  An Autistic is an Autistic is an Autistic -- always has been and always will be -- and brainwashing people into using 'correct' euphemisms will never change that, because changing labels does not change the person.

We are not our labels.


I didn't say one of those phrases was "correct" and one wasn't, I said that I noticed that one is more commonly preferred. It's fine to refer to yourself or have others refer to you however you like!

That wasn't really the point of my post though



Blue_Star
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 416

28 May 2023, 9:13 pm

So, essentially, how would one rewrite "a person with ADHD" to have the ADHD first?

Attention deficit hyperactivity disordered person? ADHDer person?

Why don't we do this for ADHD? It's a bit bloated feeling. And, with Autism, the -ism to -ic is just a part of how those endings work in modern English (from Greek, iirc).



Edna3362
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Oct 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,504
Location: ᜆᜄᜎᜓᜄ᜔

28 May 2023, 9:15 pm

Hm.

ADHD is an acronym.
Autism is a 'description'.

ADHD sounds like a symptom.
Autism is more like an attribute.



But sure.
I heard there's "ADHD'ers"... Yet I don't hear or read it often.

ADHD can be separated from a person's allistic essence.
ADHD has a story -- origins not limited to neurology, but also psychology due to it's direct associations with executive dysfunction.

Autism is still a mystery. It is not associated with executive dysfunction like how ADHD does.

Separating ADHD from executive dysfunction gives you what seem to look like an NT.
Heck, one can separate the executive dysfunction from the autistic person and still able see how autism would still looked like.

Lastly...
Unlike the autism community, ADHD community is different.
In the ADHD community, anyone can accept and understand the hate towards their ADHD -- there's no polarity there like how it is with autism.

While ADHD is not as taken seriously, it's also not associated with some condemnation either.

ADHD is not fighting associations with intellectual disability, psychopathy, crime and violence -- associations with learning disabilities however, fits their bill.

Instead, they're likely fighting for pharmaceutical treatments due to their treatments (medications) are considered to be of those 'illegal nootropics'.

You don't see autism fighting for getting medications being tampered, wouldn't?


To make it long story short;
ADHD community priorities are different.


_________________
Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).

Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.


GreenVelvetWorm
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 3 May 2023
Age: 30
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 363
Location: Canada

28 May 2023, 9:23 pm

Edna3362 wrote:
Hm.

ADHD is an acronym.
Autism is a 'description'.

ADHD sounds like a symptom.
Autism is more like an attribute.



But sure.
I heard there's "ADHD'ers"... Yet I don't hear or read it often.

ADHD can be separated from a person's allistic essence.
ADHD has a story -- origins not limited to neurology, but also psychology due to it's direct associations with executive dysfunction.

Autism is still a mystery. It is not associated with executive dysfunction like how ADHD does.

Separating ADHD from executive dysfunction gives you what seem to look like an NT.
Heck, one can separate the executive dysfunction from the autistic person and still able see how autism would still looked like.

Lastly...
Unlike the autism community, ADHD community is different.
In the ADHD community, anyone can accept and understand the hate towards their ADHD -- there's no polarity there like how it is with autism.

While ADHD is not as taken seriously, it's also not associated with some condemnation either.

ADHD is not fighting associations with intellectual disability, psychopathy, crime and violence -- associations with learning disabilities however, fits their bill.

Instead, they're likely fighting for pharmaceutical treatments due to their treatments (medications) are considered to be of those 'illegal nootropics'.

You don't see autism fighting for getting medications being tampered, wouldn't?


To make it long story short;
ADHD community priorities are different.


Oh this makes more sense to me now, thank you! I see adhd talked about in the same contexts as autism a lot since they have similarities and often overlap, so in my mind I sort of think of it as "like autism but with different types of symptoms". I haven't given much thought much about the different histories and goals they have



IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 68,654
Location: Chez Quis

28 May 2023, 9:33 pm

ADHD is a noun: Deficit.

Autistic is an adjective.
We can't say we are a deficit. We can only have a deficit.

Maybe if they changed the name of ADHD it could be identity-first.
Otherwise it just sounds grammatically incorrect, not to mention too wordy.


_________________
And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make.


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,145
Location: temperate zone

29 May 2023, 8:14 am

What you said in the original post. There is no handy adjective for it.

Except maybe "hyperactive".

Or the rare "ADHD...er" that someone above attests to having heard.

Like Down's Syndrome. For "persons with Downs syndrome" you cant say "ret*d" anymore, and you cant call them "downers" :lol:

Maybe you can coin your own term for "folks with adhd". Call yourself an "adhadder" (rhymes with 'mad hatter').

Or reference that British TV series and call yourself a "black adder" (cause it just sounds bad-ass).

And see if it catches on.



MatchboxVagabond
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Mar 2023
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,226

29 May 2023, 8:46 am

GreenVelvetWorm wrote:
I've heard that most people on the spectrum prefer to be called an "autistic person" as opposed to a "person with autism", because autism is so linked to one's personality/identity that it doesn't make sense to refer to it as a separate thing you "have" (unlike for example, a person with allergies or a person with cancer).

I agree with this and also prefer this terminology for myself, but it's made me wonder- why isn't it the same case with adhd? We pretty much always say someone "has adhd". Is it just because we don't have a good adjective form for the word, or is there something different about it that makes it better suited to "person-first" language?

(For reference I don't have adhd and I'm not implying that this difference in terminology is a bad thing, im just confused by it)

We wouldn't use identity first language with ADHD, it's usually ADDer. And we have ADHD.

But, it does get a bit weird at times as nouns are things we can be or have. But generally, diseases and mental illnesses are things we'd generally have, and personality disorders and neurological conditions tend to be things we are. But, even there is a complete mess with schizophrenia being something people have it are.

And really, person first language is for people that are either unintelligent or use a language that uses modifiers after the thing they modify.



Last edited by MatchboxVagabond on 29 May 2023, 8:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Joe90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,492
Location: UK

29 May 2023, 8:48 am

To me Asperger's is only something I have (unfortunately) got, not something that I am. So to me it's the same as my hay fever - I'm a person with hay fever but it does not define me. I can easily imagine myself without Asperger's just like I can easily imagine myself without hay fever (yes I get hay fever all year round, it can be a chronic ailment for some people, like asthma but in the sinuses instead of the lungs).

So whenever I say that my parents wished I didn't have Asperger's I hate when people say "oh but that means your parents wish they didn't have you, as Asperger's is who you are, they are bad, bad parents!" because it's not like that (and it's very insulting for anyone to badmouth my parents like that). They loved me but hated the fact that I had Asperger's.

Asperger's is not who I am. I don't want to be known by it. I want to be known by me, Joe90 (um, well, actually not Joe90, as my WP self is a racist, trolling narcissist, so I mean my real name which obviously I won't reveal here).


_________________
Female


Elgee
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 20 Dec 2021
Gender: Female
Posts: 372
Location: Med West

29 May 2023, 12:09 pm

Intriguing discussion here; I'd like to weigh in, even though I don't have ADHD.

I'm a content creator and have written about ADHD. I find it cumbersome to keep saying in my articles, "Those with ADHD," "Someone with ADHD," "People with ADHD."

I believe there've been a few times, though, where I wrote, "an ADHD'er."

ADHD is actually a term (acronym) that summarizes a collection of symptoms. So instead of saying, "She has attention deficit, impaired executive function, impulsitivity, is easily distracted and fidgets a lot," we shorten it to, "She has ADHD."

ADHD means a group of symptoms, so while it makes sense to say, "She has ADHD" or "Kids with ADHD," it becomes cumbersome when one writes an article about ADHD'ers.

By the way, untreated sleep apnea causes symptoms that significantly overlap ADHD. So if anyone here has been diagnosed with ADHD, even if you're thin (thin people can have sleep apnea), you may want to consider having a sleep study done.

The ADHD in some kids has been resolved once they were diagnosed with sleep apnea and treated for that (e.g., removal of large adenoids that were obstructing the airway during sleep).

Of course, many ADHD'ers don't have sleep apnea.



Joe90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,492
Location: UK

29 May 2023, 12:20 pm

My boyfriend has sleep apnea but has no ADHD-like symptoms.

I wish there was a word for ADHD instead of being abbreviated, then it'd be quicker to say. All they need to do is take the core symptom, translate it into Greek or Latin, and add -ism on the end.


_________________
Female