H'mm.
It's my turn to be a little disturbed by this post, as in how... blunt these posts in response sometimes are. I hope everyone is rolling with the punches
. As an autistic person myself, I think I confront the idea, not the person. (Though my non-autistic husband may beg to differ
)
Yeah, I should clear up that I probably shouldn't have used the word 'target' in my title. I just couldn't think of an alternative term. I think it's acceptable to narrow your search to a certain type of people in dating. If that's perceived as targeting, then so be it. No, of course Alan may happily end up with an NT female (notice what I did there?
) eventually. But to my knowledge, he's never tried focusing on those with ASD. So I guess I'm trying to think outside the box, given the current success rate
I should mention that he isn't opposed to dating an ASD female, just that he's uncomfortable with the idea that he himself may be autistic. When I suggested considering ASD females to him a while back, he said words to the effect of, how would he even be able to find one? So that possibility is not off the table. And my guess is that ASD peeps are the most likely to appreciate his knowledgeability and quirks. Hence my original question to you folks
And he's not a predator in any way that I can see. Any possible perception of that may be due to my clumsy choice of words.
Thanks again
FWIW, I was a linguistics major and to my knowledge, 'girl' can be interchangeable with female. I'm happy to call someone the age of my grandma a girl. And I don't think she'd mind
. I suspect the unease was due to that word's combination with 'target'. You may disagree, but I really do suspect I come from a more innocent time and place...
_________________
I may not fit in everywhere, but where it counts, I belong.