Abortion rights.
On a societal level, Western Europeans & North Americans are going to have a population crisis since babies aren't being replaced at a sufficient rate for a stable population size, or population growth.
Forcing women to have babies they don't want might slow that trend down.
But I don't think that is why abortions are frowned upon or legislated against by US Republicans. It is more of a political thing to the end of controlling women's bodies.
If anything abortion bans may increase the problem, since it makes it hard for women who want to have a baby to get an abortion if complications happen later, which could potentially cause their death or just ruin their uterus, so they won't be able to try again. Also, a lot more women who want children may be afraid of getting pregnant because they're worried, they won't get proper care if things go wrong.
Abortion bans in Poland do not seem to have helped with their declining birth rate for instance.
I suppose the risk of ruining one's uterus would rely on an attempted (and complicated) abortion. I think a lot of people would just have a baby if abortions were banned, rather than risk a dodgy abortion. But that's just an opinion.
It would be interesting to see some science or statistics on the subject.
Poland.
Generally restrictive abortion rights.
Restricted even more October 2020.
Life birth chart:

_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
Poland.
Generally restrictive abortion rights.
Restricted even more October 2020.
Life birth chart:

Interesting. It would seem that for Poland, more restrictions on abortions from 2020, seems to have had no effect on curbing the declining birth rate, according to the chart you provided.

On a societal level, Western Europeans & North Americans are going to have a population crisis since babies aren't being replaced at a sufficient rate for a stable population size, or population growth.
Forcing women to have babies they don't want might slow that trend down.
But I don't think that is why abortions are frowned upon or legislated against by US Republicans. It is more of a political thing to the end of controlling women's bodies.
If anything abortion bans may increase the problem, since it makes it hard for women who want to have a baby to get an abortion if complications happen later, which could potentially cause their death or just ruin their uterus, so they won't be able to try again. Also, a lot more women who want children may be afraid of getting pregnant because they're worried, they won't get proper care if things go wrong.
Abortion bans in Poland do not seem to have helped with their declining birth rate for instance.
I suppose the risk of ruining one's uterus would rely on an attempted (and complicated) abortion. I think a lot of people would just have a baby if abortions were banned, rather than risk a dodgy abortion. But that's just an opinion.
It would be interesting to see some science or statistics on the subject.
From my understanding, the US helped legalize it originally because of how common complications from "coat hanger" and "Pennyroyal" abortions were.
This abortion ban is VERY STUPID. Why is this happening? Why girls & women are forced to have babies? I read a 10 year old girl got pregnant cuz of rape, one doctor gave her an abortion, that doctor got a fine, I didn’t read everything. There are alot of women that have mental illness, if she get pregnant & don’t want the baby, she have to be force to give birth, what happens if she kills the baby, I read about that. The world is Pretty Scary now. What happened to freedom? Before there were abortion bans, Alyssa Milano was one of them that keep posting on her Instagram page about it.
_________________
You are my shining star that shine so bright that guide me to the light, so keep on rockin', cuz That's Rock and Roll
Sweetleaf
Veteran

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,307
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
On a societal level, Western Europeans & North Americans are going to have a population crisis since babies aren't being replaced at a sufficient rate for a stable population size, or population growth.
Forcing women to have babies they don't want might slow that trend down.
But I don't think that is why abortions are frowned upon or legislated against by US Republicans. It is more of a political thing to the end of controlling women's bodies.
If anything abortion bans may increase the problem, since it makes it hard for women who want to have a baby to get an abortion if complications happen later, which could potentially cause their death or just ruin their uterus, so they won't be able to try again. Also, a lot more women who want children may be afraid of getting pregnant because they're worried, they won't get proper care if things go wrong.
Abortion bans in Poland do not seem to have helped with their declining birth rate for instance.
I suppose the risk of ruining one's uterus would rely on an attempted (and complicated) abortion. I think a lot of people would just have a baby if abortions were banned, rather than risk a dodgy abortion. But that's just an opinion.
It would be interesting to see some science or statistics on the subject.
The risk of ruining the uteres I was referring to is if the woman cannot get an abortion on time when something is wrong with the fetus, and it like dies inside of her and she gets sepsis or something like that.
I imagine a dodgy abortion could also cause damage, but that's why it's important for it to be legal and safe. Abortions done the right way do not damage the woman in any way, aside from if they wanted the baby but the risks are too high so they have to abort that could cause some emotional turmoil for sure. But worse turmoil if they have to stay pregnant with a baby that will die as soon as its born, rather than allowing them to get the abortion and start their grieving process.
_________________
We won't go back.
On a societal level, Western Europeans & North Americans are going to have a population crisis since babies aren't being replaced at a sufficient rate for a stable population size, or population growth.
Forcing women to have babies they don't want might slow that trend down.
But I don't think that is why abortions are frowned upon or legislated against by US Republicans. It is more of a political thing to the end of controlling women's bodies.
If anything abortion bans may increase the problem, since it makes it hard for women who want to have a baby to get an abortion if complications happen later, which could potentially cause their death or just ruin their uterus, so they won't be able to try again. Also, a lot more women who want children may be afraid of getting pregnant because they're worried, they won't get proper care if things go wrong.
Abortion bans in Poland do not seem to have helped with their declining birth rate for instance.
I suppose the risk of ruining one's uterus would rely on an attempted (and complicated) abortion. I think a lot of people would just have a baby if abortions were banned, rather than risk a dodgy abortion. But that's just an opinion.
It would be interesting to see some science or statistics on the subject.
The risk of ruining the uteres I was referring to is if the woman cannot get an abortion on time when something is wrong with the fetus, and it like dies inside of her and she gets sepsis or something like that.
I imagine a dodgy abortion could also cause damage, but that's why it's important for it to be legal and safe. Abortions done the right way do not damage the woman in any way, aside from if they wanted the baby but the risks are too high so they have to abort that could cause some emotional turmoil for sure. But worse turmoil if they have to stay pregnant with a baby that will die as soon as its born, rather than allowing them to get the abortion and start their grieving process.
Surely there will be some kind of availability of an emergency abortion, if a woman needs it to keep alive herself? Would there not be a distinction of necessary versus unnecessary abortions, were an abortion ban to take effect?
I am not saying I support abortion bans in any way, by the way. I am communicating without political bias here.
Sweetleaf
Veteran

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,307
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
On a societal level, Western Europeans & North Americans are going to have a population crisis since babies aren't being replaced at a sufficient rate for a stable population size, or population growth.
Forcing women to have babies they don't want might slow that trend down.
But I don't think that is why abortions are frowned upon or legislated against by US Republicans. It is more of a political thing to the end of controlling women's bodies.
If anything abortion bans may increase the problem, since it makes it hard for women who want to have a baby to get an abortion if complications happen later, which could potentially cause their death or just ruin their uterus, so they won't be able to try again. Also, a lot more women who want children may be afraid of getting pregnant because they're worried, they won't get proper care if things go wrong.
Abortion bans in Poland do not seem to have helped with their declining birth rate for instance.
I suppose the risk of ruining one's uterus would rely on an attempted (and complicated) abortion. I think a lot of people would just have a baby if abortions were banned, rather than risk a dodgy abortion. But that's just an opinion.
It would be interesting to see some science or statistics on the subject.
The risk of ruining the uteres I was referring to is if the woman cannot get an abortion on time when something is wrong with the fetus, and it like dies inside of her and she gets sepsis or something like that.
I imagine a dodgy abortion could also cause damage, but that's why it's important for it to be legal and safe. Abortions done the right way do not damage the woman in any way, aside from if they wanted the baby but the risks are too high so they have to abort that could cause some emotional turmoil for sure. But worse turmoil if they have to stay pregnant with a baby that will die as soon as its born, rather than allowing them to get the abortion and start their grieving process.
Surely there will be some kind of availability of an emergency abortion, if a woman needs it to keep alive herself? Would there not be a distinction of necessary versus unnecessary abortions, were an abortion ban to take effect?
I am not saying I support abortion bans in any way, by the way. I am communicating without political bias here.
There are supposed to be exceptions for the life of the mother being in danger in red states, the issue is then there is bureaucracy to determine if the abortion procedure can be oked or not, and that takes time in which the womans condition can deteriorate before a decision can be made. But if the doctor decides to take action before the decision is made, because they want to save the patient they risk their entire livelihood. This is why people say abortions should only be between pregnant people and their doctor...if the state gets involved with that it gets messy. Like if a doctor knows a pregnancy will risk the life of the pregnant person, they cannot perform an abortion till those complications start happening...wheres would be better to abort before those happen where possible.
_________________
We won't go back.
auntblabby
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 112,847
Location: the island of defective toy santas
it is happening because people vote for republicans. it wouldn't be happening otherwise.
RetroGamer87
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,882
Location: Adelaide, Australia
it is happening because people vote for republicans. it wouldn't be happening otherwise.
I'm still trying to wrap my head around why people would want to vote republican.
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
Yes, that's what's happening.
It's still legal here to abort a pregnancy that causes threat to the woman's life but it means docs wait until the threat to life is obvious... which means every now and then someone dies, otherwise the life threat would have not been obvious, would it?
When it comes to abortion vs demographics - at least in Poland, people don't use abortions to regulate when they want children and how many of them. Most typically, they use condoms.
I heard it was different in Soviet Russia but that's a whole different story.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
auntblabby
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 112,847
Location: the island of defective toy santas
it is happening because people vote for republicans. it wouldn't be happening otherwise.
I'm still trying to wrap my head around why people would want to vote republican.
because they hate the rest of us for not being like them.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 22,984
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Pennyroyal is an herb that causes miscarriage.
_________________
Brought to you by Twigs and Leaves.
Made from 100% authentic twigs and leaves.
Bring nature to your bathroom with Twigs and Leaves.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う