Trump trial verdict is in - guilty!

Page 5 of 7 [ 98 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,246
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

01 Jul 2024, 2:28 pm

What does this do to the documents case??? Can he argue he was "officially" stealing those classified documents???

_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

Double Retired
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2020
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,776
Location: U.S.A. (Mid-Atlantic)

01 Jul 2024, 2:38 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:

What does this do to the documents case??? Can he argue he was "officially" stealing those classified documents???

That's a Federal case, right? His plan is likely: (1) get elected, (2) pardon himself. (But, can he pardon himself?)

_________________
When diagnosed I bought champagne!
I finally knew why people were strange.

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,061
Location: temperate zone

01 Jul 2024, 2:49 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:

What does this do to the documents case??? Can he argue he was "officially" stealing those classified documents???

Thats the question.

If the POTUS orders the assasination of a foreign terrorist to save the nation ...it might be dubbed "illegal" in the next administration, but since he did the killing as POTUS he would be immune from prosecution.

But if the POTUS pulls out a gun in the Oval office and shoots his wife...even after this SCOTUS ruling ....he would still be tried for murder because...shooting your spouse is not an official duty as POTUS!

Stealing top secret documents and storing them at your private residence would be more like shooting your wife than like ordering the Seals to kill Ben Laden I would think.

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,246
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

01 Jul 2024, 3:28 pm

naturalplastic wrote:

Kraichgauer wrote:

What does this do to the documents case??? Can he argue he was "officially" stealing those classified documents???

Until the conservative majority on the Supreme Court says otherwise.

_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

jimmy m
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jun 2018
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,989
Location: Indiana

01 Jul 2024, 5:29 pm

It seems like the Supreme Court finally made its ruling. So maybe some sanity will finally come to the U.S.

_________________
Author of Practical Preparations for a Coronavirus Pandemic.
A very unique plan. As Dr. Paul Thompson wrote, "This is the very best paper on the virus I have ever seen."

auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,479
Location: the island of defective toy santas

01 Jul 2024, 7:21 pm

more like officially sanctioned insanity.

auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,479
Location: the island of defective toy santas

01 Jul 2024, 7:36 pm

i can see the writing on the wall- we're doomed.

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,246
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

01 Jul 2024, 9:07 pm

jimmy m wrote:

It seems like the Supreme Court finally made its ruling. So maybe some sanity will finally come to the U.S.

The Supreme Court made the Dredd Scott Decision. If anything, that helped push the country into Civil War.

_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

Cornflake
Administrator

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 68,104
Location: Over there

02 Jul 2024, 6:09 am

Apparently America now has a king.
What Nixon did - using government resources to suppress evidence against him - would be legal.

Maybe George III wasn't so bad after all. :lol:

_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,061
Location: temperate zone

02 Jul 2024, 6:44 am

Cornflake wrote:

Apparently America now has a king.
What Nixon did - using government resources to suppress evidence against him - would be legal.

Maybe George III wasn't so bad after all. :lol:

Ironic. That this day...the day that will be remember as "the day democracy died in America" comes just two days before we will celebrate the birth of American democracy...when we declared independence from George III.

Cornflake
Administrator

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 68,104
Location: Over there

02 Jul 2024, 6:52 am

The timing and significance couldn't be worse, could it. Appalling.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor's Dissent is worth reading - if only to confirm that there are still 3 reasoning adults in the Supreme Court.

A 29-page pdf is linked on this page - https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... y-dissent/

_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.

MatchboxVagabond
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Mar 2023
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,620

02 Jul 2024, 3:49 pm

Cornflake wrote:

Apparently America now has a king.
What Nixon did - using government resources to suppress evidence against him - would be legal.

Maybe George III wasn't so bad after all. :lol:

That's definitely possible based on the way that the ruling was written. Normally, I would have a bit more faith that "official acts" wouldn't include things that are clearly criminal like illegal wiretaps and burglary. But, considering what we've seen with the court in recent years, I don't think they deserve any deference at all.

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,511

03 Jul 2024, 1:40 am

He's immune from prosecution now as he's a past president?
https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-suprem ... 024-07-01/

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,246
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

03 Jul 2024, 4:14 am

cyberdad wrote:

He's immune from prosecution now as he's a past president?
https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-suprem ... 024-07-01/

I have no doubt that's going to be the MAGA party line. This ruling is completely constitutionally baseless; I don't care what the Supreme Court says. No President has ever made such a horrifically specious claim! If there was any such precedent for it, why would Ford have pardoned Nixon? No other President before Trump had ever violated the law so flagrantly that he would demand that his sycophants on the court should give him a license to get away with crime!

_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,511

03 Jul 2024, 4:56 am

Kraichgauer wrote:

No other President before Trump had ever violated the law so flagrantly that he would demand that his sycophants on the court should give him a license to get away with crime!

He's avoided a Nixon type impeachment. Perhaps in Nixon's time even if he was exonerated his reputation would have resulted in rejection by the (then) American public who would have not tolerated a corrupt ex-president.

today the MAGAs are not so fussy.

Dylan the autist
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 13 Nov 2023
Age: 24
Gender: Male
Posts: 45
Location: Republic of Ireland

03 Jul 2024, 7:04 am

I hope trials will continue to be conducted on the other corrupt politicians of both parties, if it stops at Trump it will be for the sake of a political class in competition with him but if trials continue maybe this could be the start of accountability for politicians of the U.S. I personally would like every foreign policy advisor of the U.S. since World War 2 to be held accountable for its disasters.

Page 5 of 7 [ 98 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next

Jump to:

Trump trial verdict is in - guilty! Post Reply New Topic

Trump trial verdict is in - guilty!