SHOCK - Prank Call Leads to Kids Getting Electro Shock

Page 2 of 3 [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

23 Dec 2007, 12:19 pm

First off I would have thought that the administering of a shock would be in an immediate response to a serious infraction and not something to be arbitrarily doled out on a whim over the phone like ordering a goddamned pizza. What kind of brain dead moron would accept such an order? That in itself shows that the Rotenberg Center should obviously not be allowed to carry out such “treatments”. :roll:

“I was just following orders”. Wasn’t that the common defense used by Nazi war criminals at the Nuremburg Trials following WWII?

I guess this is going to be the way of controlling all people in the future. Someday when this type of treatment becomes more accepted (when we have seen so much of it that we become desensitized to it) everyone will be wired and monitored. It IS coming to that one step at a time and we are already several steps in the direction of that objective.



jjstar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,627

23 Dec 2007, 1:41 pm

School Gets Extension on Shock Treatment

14 hours ago

BOSTON (AP) — A special education school where two emotionally disturbed students were wrongly given dozens of shocks after a prank call will be allowed to use electric shock treatments on students for another year.

But the state's Office of Health and Human Services said the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center must prove it uses shock treatments only for the most dangerous and self-destructive behaviors, and also show that the treatments reduce those behaviors.

On Aug. 26, someone posing as a supervisor called in shock treatments on two students, aged 16 and 19. The teens were awakened in the middle of the night and given the shock treatments, at times while their legs and arms were bound. One teen received 77 shocks and the other received 29. One was treated for two first-degree burns.

A state report found that staff made multiple mistakes when they followed the prank caller's directions.

The report by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care said six staffers at a Stoughton residence run by the Canton-based school had reason to doubt the orders to administer the shocks, but did nothing to stop it.

The six staff members and video surveillance worker on duty that night were fired on Oct. 1.

The caller said he was ordering the punishments because the teens had misbehaved earlier in the evening. But none of the staffers had witnessed any problems. The report said the caller was a former resident of the center with knowledge of its operations. Police are looking into filing criminal charges.

The incident in Stoughton renewed calls by school critics for the state to ban the shock treatments. But state officials said the parents of some residents defend the school and its methods.

Hosted by
Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gqyb ... QD8TMU5I00


_________________
Natives who beat drums to drive off evil spirits are objects of scorn to smart Americans who blow horns to break up traffic jams. ~Mary Ellen Kelly


alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,214
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

23 Dec 2007, 2:02 pm

http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Special_Ed_Sc ... n_bad_kids


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


zendell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,174
Location: Austin, TX

23 Dec 2007, 6:45 pm

I thought this school had video cameras so they could monitor these kids all the time. If so, they should have been able to see the kids weren't doing anything wrong. Their website says shocks are used for dangerous and aggressive behaviors. I don't think that would be to hard to see. Maybe they went along with it because they didn't like the kids then used the "I was just following orders" as an excuse to avoid getting fired.



nirrti_rachelle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,302
Location: The Dirty South

23 Dec 2007, 7:43 pm

We don't allow this kind of treatment with dogs. Why the heck is it suddenly okay when applied to disabled kids? The human race is so d*mn sick it's a shame. :x

Oh, and I would trust a rabid dog's ability to feel empathy more than I'll ever trust a human's.


_________________
"There is difference and there is power. And who holds the power decides the meaning of the difference." --June Jordan


Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,750

27 Dec 2007, 6:04 pm

I would trust a tiger's ability to feel empathy better than I would a human's.



ed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Age: 79
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: Whitinsville, MA

27 Dec 2007, 6:31 pm

New information:

Quote:
D.C. mayor’s aide would halt funds to Rotenberg Center over shock therapy

WASHINGTON - An aide to Washington D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty says he has no reservations about seeking a court order to cut off funds to a Massachusetts special education school that uses shock-therapy.

Peter Nickles has already promised to transfer 10 District children out of the Judge Rotenberg Center by March. He tells The (Washington) Examiner, "This is not a place for our kids."

However, attorneys representing parents of nine of the children have asked city officials not to interfere.

The center says its therapy is more effective on disturbed children than medication. But two students were wrongly given dozens of shocks last August on orders from a person posing as a supervisor during a prank call.

Nickles says he has hired consultants to inspect Rotenberg next month.


http://www.bostonherald.com/news/region ... id=1063076



Remnant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,750

29 Dec 2007, 9:56 pm

jjstar wrote:

The caller said he was ordering the punishments because the teens had misbehaved earlier in the evening. But none of the staffers had witnessed any problems. The report said the caller was a former resident of the center with knowledge of its operations. Police are looking into filing criminal charges.



They should file criminal charges against the staff.



Zwerfbeertje
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 6 Sep 2007
Age: 123
Gender: Male
Posts: 362

31 Dec 2007, 3:38 am

I think so too, unless these staff members can be considered automatic machines without minds of their own, push the button, they move.



Pandora
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,553
Location: Townsville

03 Jan 2008, 3:52 am

Remnant wrote:
jjstar wrote:

The caller said he was ordering the punishments because the teens had misbehaved earlier in the evening. But none of the staffers had witnessed any problems. The report said the caller was a former resident of the center with knowledge of its operations. Police are looking into filing criminal charges.



They should file criminal charges against the staff.
They surely should. I wonder if one can be charged with criminal stupidity? Apart from that, they should be charged with assault and sacked from their jobs with the centre.


_________________
Break out you Western girls,
Someday soon you're gonna rule the world.
Break out you Western girls,
Hold your heads up high.
"Western Girls" - Dragon


ed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Age: 79
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: Whitinsville, MA

03 Jan 2008, 10:58 am

Pandora wrote:
they should be... sacked from their jobs with the centre.


They were.



_Pie_
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 7

03 Jan 2008, 12:46 pm

What? How can they do that to people?

They don't do what you want so you just torture them? Sick bastards.

I don't see how it could treat anything, just make people extremely scared to be themself.



ed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Age: 79
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: Whitinsville, MA

03 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm

_Pie_ wrote:
What? How can they do that to people?

They don't do what you want so you just torture them? Sick bastards.

I don't see how it could treat anything, just make people extremely scared to be themself.


Very well said, and welcome to WrongPlanet.net!

I've been emailing Governor Patrick about this, and apparently others have too... it's his administration that just approved the one-year extension for the school... you can find his contact info here: http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=gov3utiliti ... contact_us ...if enough people contact him (especially by phone ...though I don't like using the phone :lol: ) we might be able to make a difference.



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 45,521
Location: Houston, Texas

04 Jan 2008, 11:29 am

_Pie_ wrote:
What? How can they do that to people?

They don't do what you want so you just torture them? Sick bastards.

I don't see how it could treat anything, just make people extremely scared to be themself.


Welcome to WP!

Tim


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


Ana54
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,061

07 Jan 2008, 4:08 am

I am terrified by this place, angry at it and disgusted by it. I almost threw up all over the magazine when I read it in the library.

Ed-- OMG. Have you met any of them? Seen them? Seen their expressions? Talked to them? Heard any comments or conversations? Heard anything, seen anything? Seen any pain in their eyes? Please tell us! Have you tried to do anything down there? Do you know anyone who works or goes to school there?



ed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Age: 79
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: Whitinsville, MA

12 Jan 2008, 9:56 am

For fairness, here is a Boston Globe op-ed piece by the parents of a boy at the Center:

Quote:
HOME / GLOBE / OPINION / OP-ED
LOUISA AND ROBERT GOLDBERG

Skin shock therapy gave our son back his life
By Louisa and Robert Goldberg
January 12, 2008
WHEN recent news stories detailed how two students were inappropriately given skin shocks at the Judge Rotenberg Education Center in Canton, my husband and I cringed in anticipation of the well-meaning question, "Do you think your son is OK at that place?"

We've heard it all before and our answer is still the same: Our son Andrew is not just OK at the Judge Rotenberg Center; he's never been better or safer than during his six years there.

Against the backdrop of headlines and news accounts that conjure up the mistaken images of "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" and electroconvulsive therapy, this is difficult to explain to people who cannot understand how even a mild skin shock therapy is more humane than what many of these kids are subjected to in psychiatric hospitals and other specialized schools.

So we tell them Andrew's story, which is also the story of hundreds of families who've found their way to the center after painful journeys bouncing from psychiatric wards to specialized schools and even protective custody (jail) with their children, who may be severely disabled, self-abusive, or physically aggressive. Their obvious suffering, and the suffering of their parents, is unimaginable.

Andrew's situation is complex. He requires special food and attention at mealtimes, has seizures daily, functions at a 3-year-old level, and had shown aggression toward others when even the smallest demands were made. As a toddler, Andrew was placed in early intervention and day programs, and we were trained in and used behavior modification.

By age 9, it was clear Andrew could not live safely at home, so we took the painful step toward placing him in a highly regarded residential school. Initially, Andrew did well with traditional treatment techniques; including behavior modification, restraint (as needed), and eventually drug therapy. But in time his behaviors became extremely dangerous - attacking staff, pulling hair, biting, tipping over furniture.

Almost once a week his violent outbursts resulted in a school staff member going to the emergency room.

His life became a mere existence as levels of powerful drugs were increased to control him. The staff who had once loved our funny, congenial son was now afraid of him and one day expelled him.

In the panic of this chaos we found the Judge Rotenberg Center.

The politicians and healthcare professionals now attacking skin shock therapy as "cruel" are misleading the public into thinking that there are better options for these children.

But when these "better options" don't work, where is the outrage about the years of noneffective treatment given those children who are so self-abusive that they have actually detached their own retinas from pounding their fists into their eyes, or those whose heads are misshapen from banging them repeatedly against walls and floors?

Where is the public outrage over how many children and young adults in Massachusetts spend their days in prolonged restraint or are so disabled from excessive psychotropic drugs they can barely stay awake?

We opted for the program at Judge Rotenberg Center because restraints and drugs did not work for Andrew and, frankly, we had run out of options. Andrew no longer injures people, is awake, alert, and happy. No longer is Andrew restrained for hours at a time, and he takes no psychotropic drugs. His infrequent aggressive behaviors are treated in a quick and controlled manner by a localized skin shock, and he is redirected to the task at hand. We have our old son back and he is functioning as a real person.

It has been demonstrated that skin shock therapy, added to a positive reward program, breaks the cycle of aggressive and self-abusive behavior. The students then begin to participate in academics, receive vocational training, live in community group homes, and are able to be part of their family again.

Unless and until a more effective therapy becomes available, skin shock therapy has proven to be the most effective alternative to physical and chemical restraints that have left so many of these children imprisoned in their own world. It is the least restrictive and most effective therapy for this small group of very difficult individuals, such as our son, and must continue to be an option.

Louisa and Robert Goldberg live in Greater Boston.

© Copyright 2008 Globe Newspaper Company.


http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/edito ... _his_life/