can someone summarize hillary clinton's autism program?

Post Reply New Topic

Didn't we have a surplus when he left?

How fast did the failed oilman/drug addict/alkie/AWOL spoiled "I hear voices, must be Jeebus" Shrub get us into the red?

Could surplus mean we were making more money then we were spending?

I thought we were still somewhat indebted to other countries when he got out of office. But the point is we wouldn't be in debt much or at all at this point.
Everyone remembers Clinton for the sex scandal and the time he smoked marijuana, but he was such a great president.

Actually, the surplus was supposedly there even BEFORE clinton took office the first time, but it was a ******BUDGET****** surplus!(The years budgeted expenses were less than the years budgeted "revenues") With TRILLIONS of dollars in debt, and the fact that taxpayers now are STILL paying for their grandparents debt and retirement, do you REALLY think it would EVER be paid off!?!? HECK, they were talking about increasing the retirement age quite a bit when clinton was in office, and I am sure even before that.

BTW For those that don't understand a budget surplus....

The Expenses are NOT real! They are basically INTEREST on bonds, tbills, and various loans. They do NOT include Social Security, etc... The "Revenues" are generally TAXES!! ! They aren't reliable, predictable, or even real revenue.

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy01/browse.html

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy01/ ... st01z3.xls

What about NOW?

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy07/ ... st01z4.xls

Interesting! They include the trust fund info! I guess because, for the moment, it seems better. Never mind that most of the outlay is going to people that aren't paying anything in, and most of the people paying in are supposed to later get paid.

This IS just a summary, but you can see how it is only a budget, and even if realized, they wouldn't pay for even next year. From what I have heard, this would take at least 70 years to become a REAL surplus. Some estimates would be as high as 120 years! And that is if they counted everything.

Hillary has an autism plan? who knew?..

It's about time we had a woman president, that time is now
It's about time we had a black president, that time is now
choose one...

Well, I'm sure it's a bullet point on the Powerpoint presentation she'll set up during her upcoming 3rd term...

Well, I have seen a few movies that claimed even CHELSEA was going to be president. If you want to have a woman president, GREAT! Let's just not have it be a clinton.

I can tell you're not a Southpark fan.

Hilary's knowledge on autism I always equated with Oprah's knowledge, if you can call it that. They seem more interested in the sensational aspects of autism and "finding a cure", which for some reason I always equated with those quacks who promoted phrenology, or who said homosexuality could be cured. Autism isn't a disease, it's not something you can catch, it's who you are.

The difference is not even Oprah is supporting Hilary now. She's supporting Obama. What does that say about Hilary?

All Hillary will do is go after men and continue the outrageous male bashing that is so prevalent in the US. She will take from the rich to give to the lazy...yes, I said lazy...I don't mind taking from the rich to give to the real poor, I mind taking from the rich to give to the lazy. She'll then pass more laws, like her husband did, to "protect women"...oops, no, she'll pass more laws to hurt men...she'll pass more laws so that women have power and men have less choices, ie. current child support laws.

At the end of the day, I would vote for Ron Paul as the only candidate that allows people to take responsibility for their actions and as the only one who is concerned with everyone's rights. However, if he doesn't do well in the primaries, then my vote would definitely be for Obama.

I think each member of the autistic American population should decide by himself whether to vote or not and who to vote for.