ford_prefects_kid wrote:
In response to the last page of posts: Look, I appreciate silliness as much as the next person, but don't try to pass it off as logic or a proper reduction of the absurd because it's annoying.
No idea what your talking about. Do you mean the absurd in the same way Camus used the word? Using a phrase "reduction of the absurd" also could mean Reductio ad absurdum. Sounds like an ad hominem either way, as my points are quite valid.
Oh, and in response to the objective moral question-
I don't have one. Just playing devils advocate. There are no real objective ways to go in either direction, so I figured I'd just throw gas on the fire. Seems to have confused most people though, so it didn't have the goal I hoped - making people see absurdity in their "moral" choices.